You've got to be shitting me. They ain't in it for the sex bro

It's a business where the main product is fantasy - some are just better at selling it than others.  

But, um, you keep thinking that you're the super-stud if that works for you.

Trying to sexually please a provider is like trying to piss on a volcano to put it out.  It's an effort doomed to fail.

first of all, as mentioned by literbike, being a good lover has absolutely nothing to do with the length of time it takes for a man to cum. it's about being sexually compatible and having natural chemistry, which cannot be taught, learned, manufactured or faked.

as for what i prefer, i enjoy variety, so i would not know want it to be always one way or the other. if i absolutely had to choose, i would be greedy and say both...my ideal sexual experience would involve at least two orgasms for my partner: the first one where he is overcome with lust and ravenous passion and ejaculates in just a few minutes, followed by an hour of so of him taking his time and using my body for his maximum pleasure...pushing me to the absolute limits of my endurance and abilities. yeah, that is the best.

(btw, i could not care LESS about having an orgasm of my own, in or outside the hobby...just does not enhance the experience for me at all).

I only say dumbshit because I believe your purpose is to be provocative.

The survey asked about the person's partner, and did not identify that partner's gender. So, that includes both homosexual and hetrosexual liaisons.

Simple facts, surveys and statistics are often useless. There is not enough auxillary information in this one to draw any conclusion with a reasonable certaintly. But that doesn't stop people from drawing conclusion based on their preconceived notions.



HalfHour