
I've had a few HJ's that were 10's, friggen awesome!!
I know, that's not the point, but, thought i'd share!! lol
WTF! I don't get it. Why should a "provider" giving hand jobs get more then a 7 in performance? It makes no sense.
WTF! So a hand job provider gets a point for being Bi. What is that? Does that mean she rubs clits?
WTF is a once in a lifetime hand job? Does that mean she makes you shoot to outer space? Your dick just gets rubbed raw and she medicates it on your way out the door?
Why should that even remotely compare to a provider who sucks, fucks, kisses and gives her all in a session?
End of my WTF post.
um.. Must have been you.
I am not trying to be mean. but we ladies for the most part can look past alot of little things that we find unattractive.. but YES, sad but true even we have boundries...
Now if you are reading someone else's review of another lady...
Maybe he does not get Hand jobs at home and that is what turns him on and that is what he came for.
I did not figure out how to give a hand job til I was in my early 30's.. I was afraid of the penis..
( god I am embarrassed to admit that)
While I have no objection to a hand job, my gripe has to do with the performance scores that are given out.
I myself have several massage places that I use as a plan B when needed. I would not review them and rate them an 9 or a 10 in performance for a second rate service.
The way the TER scoring works, if he was offered FS, and all the other services for her to score a 9, but the monger chose to only get a HJ, then he has the right to give her credit for it and thus a higher score. Why should be provider be graded down if the client didn't want the service she was willing to provide?
He is talking about so called "providers" who only provide a "rub and tug" yet get scores on a par with "real" providers who will fuck your brains out.
I think there is something definitely wrong with a system that allows for that type of scoring disparity.
We are not talking about something on the menu that the guy does not take advantage of, we are talking about providers with almost nonexistent menus.
it's because you've been looking behind the curtain again (or even that the OP is a mod). But since the rest of us don't have that info, it's not possible for us to tell simply from the OP.
FYATWYRIO.
Wouldn't have just been easier for you to admit you were wrong? It was written in pretty plain english, well maybe not plain enough for you? lmao
And I'll take you both on at the same time, you ol' bags a shit...
A rating system that combines scores and services offered (instead of "what were the services?" how well were the services rendered"?) is just wrong. Mathesar used to explain why that was a problem statistically back in the day.
I would rather it be handled like hotels- 3 star, 4 star, 5 star (meaning "more services offered"), and then ranking among the hotels.
I am amazed at the number of men that whine like babies about a score..
So what! She got a 4 or a 10.. read the review, look at her stats read her other reviews and decide to see her or not.. ? Think for yourself.
This is not a 100% gurantee! His 10 might be your 4..
learn to read between the lines..
Put on your big girl panties and do it or go back to your play pen and watch from the sidelines.
Not only that, despite the fact that you've quoted my post, your answer doesn't even seem to respond to it. I could care less, but the original post did not seem clear, so I tried to clarify. So sue me.
PS:
That did come accross as being a bit crabby. That was not my intent....
PS:
I'm just going to crawl back into the womb. with just my penis. on a TER "4" and a bottle of rum. yohoho, lassy!
I've had a few HJ's that were 10's, friggen awesome!!
I know, that's not the point, but, thought i'd share!! lol
Some providers know how to give really good hand job. I had one provider give a hand that felt just as good then actually intercourse. It's all in the performance I guess.
However if a provider is getting scores higher then 7, it should raise a few eyebrows. I've had to give providers who should have gotten a 9 or 10 a 7, simply because they did not at least offer BBBJ, DFK, or GREEK. I've had mind blowing sex, with providers where everything had to be covered, and put on a great performance, but TER, told me I could only give them no higher then 7.
If providers area getting 10's now for only giving HJ, then I am personally demanding to change the score of seven young laides TER told me I had to give them a 7, and not a 9 or 10 in order for my review to be approved.
WTF! So a hand job provider gets a point for being Bi. What is that? Does that mean she rubs clits?
WTF is a once in a lifetime hand job? Does that mean she makes you shoot to outer space? Your dick just gets rubbed raw and she medicates it on your way out the door?
Why should that even remotely compare to a provider who sucks, fucks, kisses and gives her all in a session?
End of my WTF post.
Can you provide a link to the review?
HH
There are probably others.
It's not sex in my book. I agree that it's not a 7 because I can't review something that would never happen.
It's the RATING system of TER.
Those are different topics.
HH
The kissing with tongue would get her one point so an 8. She receives no "extra" points for DATY according to TER review guidelines.
It's "kisses with tongue," "really bi," "BBBJ," and "anal" that can raise the score above 7. In this case it is the dfk and bi thing that allows her a 9.
By ter rules, if she offers dfk and is really bi, she can get a 9 with no bj or fs offer. I was thinking of a specific fbsm lady who gets lots of 9s. Someone else just provided you the link to the same girl I was thinking of. I am sure there are others.
Anyway it definitely falls under the ter rules. I'm sure "it's the best damn hj" all those guys ever received
HJ with "no" for everything else is a max of 7. I was just responding to your post that said HJ can't be above 7, to show you how it could go above. Obviously you already knew that according to your other post ("Wrong") replying to Al to the rescue. We are actually on the same page here
:But if the hand was youthful and perky would that raise it to at least an 8 in appearance?:
guys talk about jerking themselves off in a session, ala porn movies. personally, i don't really get that. in my long life, i've had it suggested a couple of times, went with it and felt, well, like i was jerking myself off in front of somebody. just seemed dumb. wtf? provider hand job, self "hand relief". none of my fucking business what goes on, why am i even here...
is wtf supposed to be capitalized?
because WHAT THE FUCK is wrong with a guy who will jerk himself off when there is a perfectly good mouth, pussy, ass etc right in front of him? lmao
WTF???!!!
Seems what we have here is one more thread that proves you have to read the juicy details.
The ratings don't even tell half the story since a lady that will kiss with tongue, is really bi but only offers massage and HJ can get a 9 in performance.
Is the OP bashing the system or the reviewer. The reviewer is following the guidelines, don't bash him.
I do agree that a system that gives a HJ session potentially the same rating as a FS session is faulty.
further thinking compels me to say any performance rating system that rates services offered rather than actual performance needs some adjustment. But I think we have certainly beat that subject to death.
Furthermore if it's a performance rating a HJ is performed and so it could be rated on how well it was done and for a HJ it could have been a 10. Yep, as I write I'm feeling as if I've contradicted myself.
Let me regroup:
If we want performance rating then we have to allow any performance to be eligible for the top rating.
If we want a services rating then we need a system that only rates based on services offered regardless of the quality.
I think most want a performance rating. The services could just be a list and we decide which service or services we want. Then we rate the provider on how well she performed what we received from her. Then we need to stop gripping about how can a HJ get a 10. A HJ is a service. The service can be rated. If it was a damn good HJ then it can get a 10.
I think I've said it correctly this time. ...and I am aware that what I've said here negates the last statement of my above post. That was not a completely objective statement.
So what do you think?
what you say seems reasonable and sane to me. services performed should be separated from the quality of how those services are delivered: how satisfied the customer is. the performance ratings on TER mix two concepts that should, as you point out, be kept distinct.
the mixing of menu and skill renders the rating vague. that vagueness is bound to create misunderstanding and disatisfaction.
Bi HJ hooker, does that mean she uses both hands?
,sounds like she needs to reserve a bed at MP's halfway house.
:bareback--to completion--and you don't wipe your hand off afterwards:
a rare find indeed.
I've been asking for the inclusion of TER Profile ID number in the review form (and auto-fill of the fields once selected) for a long time but this is another feature that can be implemented.
Set the maximum allowable rating to remain fixed at 7 UNLESS you actually adjust a field in the review that will increment it. If all relevant fields (tongue, bi, etc.) are "No" or even "Don't know", then the performance field maxes out at 7.
It would take a fair amount of programming but it's not impossible to do. If TER could implement those things (TER ID, auto-fill and max performance auto-increment) to work in a new submission form, I'd give it a 9, maybe even a 10! As is, with no changes, it's a "4 - TER just laid there."