why 'ol HalfHour won't submit TER reviews. Requiring graphic mechanical depiction of a session is ...

well, I'll simply say 'not my cup of tea.' Let's just leave it at that.


HH

-- Modified on 10/8/2011 5:08:13 PM

Guys come on this site for details & the nitty gritty, not your commentary on her areolas or your inner feelings. If you can't write an honest down & dirty review, you don't deserve to have it accepted.

I'm pissed, but partially at myself for not double-checking to see that my reviews are accepted.  
I posted a review on a long-time, hugely-reviewed provider, (reviews going back ten fucking years! four digit TER number, no less!) with "juicy details" as follows:

I prefer to stress physical and other descriptions beyond the bump and grind aspects that have already been described so well. However, I will say this to all that venture here in the future: She clearly tries to be there for what you want. Within certain constraints, she will satisfy your desires. That being said, if you are not into the act of DATY for your own satisfaction, don’t bother. In fact, I don’t think most guys before or after me will really make her cum, but I’ll bet they think they did! Hell, I think I did!
       Back to physical descriptions: She is older than her pictures by 10+ years but professional enough to keep her body in shape. Also, she wore a wig, which I had discerned and she admitted during a particularly energetic moment. She has nice D-implants that have been there for quite some time, so they now have a nice natural hang but are sub-muscular and have that characteristic movement with her arm and chest actions. Because I am unapologetically breast-obsessed, I must add that her areolas are small, though not tiny, and her actual nipples are large enough, erect, and responsive. Overall, very nice indeed.
      As to the sucking and fucking, all I will add to her pages of reviews is that she is a professional and will strive to make sure you’re happy. I will also add this: On initial meeting, I thought I was going to have a difficult time with achieving an experience that lived up to my expectations. But in the end, there was Kxxx, in all her professionalism and wacky spiritualism. In the end, she was hugely fun and should be proud of it!   (END OF REVIEW)

       Okay, that was the review.  So, I don't know about you, but after reading through 30 or 40 reviews describing how they banged the woman in this or that position or how she devoured their cock, etc., etc., I myself prefer a review that puts in more information about the quality of the session.  To me, those are the "juicy details" I look for to determine whether to book a particular provider, and  I don't mind saying I'm proud of my own efforts to do so!
       BTW, I tried to add a few nuggets to satisfy this bullshit, but the three month limit has passed.  I think TER should give me a by on this one, don't you? (Moderators:  Do you have any say in this?)

highly reviewed lady. I described what made her special for me, and that our experience was special. That's what inspired the style and tone of the review in the first place. I wanted to convey that out of respect for the nice intimate effort she made, and not a bang bang sporting event.

However, so that it WOULD get approved. I put a sentence in to the effect of: As for the alphabet requirements XX, XXX, XXXXXX, XX - a list of what I had not mentioned in the review and it made it. You know the rules, you've been here long enough.

It is a shame that you did all that work, and thoughts from a 'good place' and it didn't matter.

Like I said on a recent post - TER you ain't perfect, but you're pretty damn good.

.o2

They usually get things like this straightened out.

you can't out run age forever, but she sounds like she's keeping up.  maybe you wrote too much?

Why did they reject? I appreciate that type of review. Thanks.

Thanks for the support.
In short, they said it didn't have enough description of the actual sucking and fucking.
What a pile of horse shit!

How many times do want to read the same in out, in out?    If all you read the reviews for is vicarious thrills, I can see your point, but can't you find plenty of other places for that?  If you use the review for making a decision on whether to see a provider or not, you'll end up skipping past all these repetitive entries.

And BTW, I didn't include "inner feelings"..... just a description of what to expect from the session beyond a wet cunt and mouth.  

From what you're suggesting, each goddamn review could just as well be about fucking a barnyard animal.  You could give just about the same in out, in out slop detail on a reasonably comely ewe.

Two of which were taken down by some fucking idiotic cunt rag motherfucking douchbag coward who can't seem to differentiate between the obvious and the unique experience that portrays the session from a different perspective.  

Seriously, I've seen reviews like this get approved -> "we went and dfk, then off to bed. she bbbj, I DATY, then CG, RCG, MISH, Doggy, and then BOOM. It was a great ending. I would repeat. "

WTF?  LMFAO. Not sure about others but I don't see a provider to just to bust a nut.  I'd sit home and yank it myself if that is all I wanted. When I read a review, I get fucking sick and tired of reading the same old god damn repeitition of the same acronyms over and over and over again. I mean, how much of a gold fish memory does one need to have not to know what the menu is? Are we THAT stupid?

I go way out of my way to see top notch ladies who give me a different kind of experience. The total effect, the attitude, the atmosphere, and the awesome moment in space-time that can only be expressed by comparing it to a mind blowing moment in space time. lol  Sometimes you just wanna leave out some details cuz it destroys the experience.

It surprises me that there are so many dumb fucks who need 500 repetitions of the same menu and the same story. Some of us are smart enough to "get it" by the 3rd or 4th review... and we hobby for a fundamentally different reason, not just to bust a nut.  


DA

owing to the fact, as you pointed out, that she has many reviews that more than adequately describe what is on her menu.

I like your review because it adds some dimension to that, and you do state her attitude (the most important part of a provider's repetoire) is good.

If she had only a few reviews that didn't really describe her whole menu, then I might go along with the whole alphabet soup concept of reviews, but here is is not necessary, or even desirable, for that matter.

Next case!

I agree it's nice to see a review with a little more depth.  But when I'm reading a new review I am also looking to confirm what's on her current menu.  To that end, a brief review including acronyms is helpful, because, as we all know, your entries about her details don't end up in the review.  That is what's probably behind TER's policy, and it doesn't preclude your other observations.
If you read enough reviews you wonder how some of them get approved, including many that are almost unredable or so short they don't give the specified info.

but probably provided no more information that you...  but a different style of writing.   I wonder if the Review Gods even read beyond  "I prefer to stress physical and other descriptions beyond the bump and grind aspects that have already been described so well."   That sounds non-compliant with the review policy.  NEXT!!
H

Like the mods (and the rest of humanity) each has his own way of interpreting the standards.  I've had a review rejected on fuzzy grounds, resubmitted it a day later with almost no changes and had it approved.  Go figya.