The rules are what the rules are. For TER's purposes without a link the provider is not verifiable. Without this stipulation fake reviews, even fake listings would be rampant...to a degree, fake reviews still are.

When you see the words "Report New Website" on a gal's profile it means her previous link is no longer active, not that she never had one.

I can't answer the question as to why your actual reviews are not being accepted but rest assured, TER wants to publish reviews.  If they are rejecting yours then there is a reason.

I don't see where the problems you are having could relate to a lack of good providers.  They are out there and hundreds of reviews get published every day here on TER. Be patient, take a look at what other guys are writing and realize that, without a provider link, you are waisting your time even writing a review.

I wish you better luck down the road...

TER does NOT allow anyone to review the same girl OVER & OVER.  If your experience is different with the same girl, then write a new review... BUT,   you will get no credit for a "rehashed" review, and the old one may be subject to deletion.

No website, means no guy can access the lady. They MUST have a legit site--- period.

Best to you.  Fuzzy

If you can link to an ad she posted on Eros, Cityvibe etc. or some other place, that is also allowed.

I studied them like the Torah... but couldn't help but fall asleep after the first one.  

I've seen worse, but seldom more boring.  No sense of the provider or what it would be like to session with her.

The way your reviews are written, it sounds as though you don't even care about the sessions or the girls you meet. You have the enthusiasm of a dead giraffe. Are you having any fun at all?

here's a handy checklist to follow.  you absolutely will not go wrong if your review adresses these points :

1. describe her apperanace :  did she look like her fotos?  if not, were were the major differences?

2. describe her attitude

3. whar was the environment like [briefly]?

4. any difficulties maing the appointment, meeting up with her?

5. tell us what the two of you did together : with as much or as little jargon and/or abbreviations as necessary, walk us through the session.  what services were provided, which were not?  how do you rate the quality of the services provided?  was there anything exceptional, either positive or negative, about this experience?  was she enthuiastic, a good fantasy salesperson, a clockwatcher, or deadand inert to the world?

6. do you think she was a good value for the donation?

7. would you repeat?  why/why not?

8. would you reccommenf?  why/why not?

8. any other additional comments/observations, speculations you think could be germane to a proper understanding of your session, and which will provide helpful and useful info to the other TER hobbyists who read it and are considering the lady under review.

That's it -- it's really no diffeent than when you learn how to write simple compositions in grade school.  Intoduction/body/close.  But you have much more fun with the fieldwork here.


Also, please don't forget the boring techical stuff.  copy and paste the website correctly, fill out the provider stats form correctly.

Good luck to you.  Don't get discouraged -- pretty much everyone has reviews turned down and delayed, and often for technical reasons having nothing to do with the worth of the review itself.  I've found TER staff to be responsive and helpful on the several occassions I dealt with them re delayed review.  I had one which took almost 9 weeks to post, but post it did.

Again, best of luck to you.



Take a look atthis guy and his style.  Hes not meeting up with VIPs or centerfolds but there seem to be no doubt as to what happened and what he thinks of it.


http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberID=306400&Membername=roniron


-- Modified on 1/14/2008 6:13:08 PM

-- Modified on 1/14/2008 7:35:38 PM

Thanks for all your constructive and non judgmental criticisms. I it good to know that there are actual critics hobbying.

Looking back at the reviews that made it through I can see where they are not "exiting blockbusters of literary guile" but they were honest, direct and to the point.
My problem of course is not with the reviews that did make it but the ones that did not.
All of the information was some of them. but they were rejected because of explicit details. When I asked for information from the Gods, I mean admin nothing came back as to how to rectify.
One of the providers I met does not post ads on any site except a competitors review board, so I am screwed there.

As far as my literary prowls, I am new to this and did not want to "Kiss and Tell" so to speak. sorry for being discreet yet honest.