Noticed many hobbyists who post in this forum.......some ad infinitum.......do not post provider reviews.  Not judging, promise.  Just wondering why.

Under a reviewer handle. Many who are prolific here do not want the hookers knowing who they are when booking...kinda like me.... I don't post under my hooker persona.

Am sure there is a good reason..........but unable to figure it out at the moment.  Call me dense.......no problem.........but care to share?

......but I gave up anonimity in this hobby (as well as my other fave P4P activities) a long time ago. I choose to post reviews to give folks a different perspective from a female POV. I suppose its good fapping material as well

If they want to be a douche bag on the boards, what self respecting hooker would want to see that alone? They know that and review under a different handle.  

Thank you for the enlightening and HONEST explanation.

reveal any useful information that wasn't covered in the prior 39.

I post more often these days and have very few reviews for a couple of reasons...
1) Once I find someone I like, I generally stick with them for a while, and multiple reviews of the same lady aren't allowed.
2) There just aren't that many ladies in the area.

When I first came on this board well over a decade ago I didn't like the idea of writing a review in as graphic detail as required to get a review approved. To this day I still don't, and THAT is why I don't review.

For the record, I have "given back" as much as any poster/reviewer on this board. I have moderated over a dozen boards, answered countless questions by newbies and even hosted a couple of M&Gs. So if your goal is to "shame" me for not writing reviews, you can kindly go fuck yourself.

Also for the record, I freely give out my handle when booking a session, if a woman doesn't want to see me based on what I say on these board, then she too can go fuck herself. lol  Actually any woman who would refuse to see me based on my board posts would most likely be doing us both a favor, as GaGambler is very much like the "real" me, I am pretty much the same person IRL. So anyone who doesn't like my GaGambler persona won't like the real me either.

...even though I post under my alias, what you read is what shows up. BTW, this gal doesn't care whether we review or not.

... include being able to share intimate experiences that involve providers we've reviewed without exposing the identities of the providers.  

Can you honestly say that if a lady has 40 reviews and 2 are much lower rated than all the others, that you don't discount the 2?

It's simply that only the last one shows up on her page and as I found out recently the reviewer doesn't get VIP day credits for reviews of a lady after the initial review of her. Free VIP days don't motivate me to write reviews, although it is a nice bonus. I saw a provider 8 times and wrote a review each time.

I think that if you posted under your professional handle, you'd get more business, at least that's my angle on it.

Guys like myself love to see outspoken women.  Having met more than a few, I can attest that they make for very satisfying sessions.

any of the points you mentioned (meaning they're not important to me.)

I am most affected by the LATEST reviews. I guess probably because I automatically start at the top of the list, reading the most recent because it's at the top. And HOW recent it seems important.

Finally, something that makes sense to me!  Cheers!

I have health issues that can make me a difficult client. Some days I don't work at all. I just don't think I can be a fair judge given about half the time I can't stay hard enough to play. Some times I get there and know from the start I am a no go and I just talk and relax as I give her a massage or she gives me one. Yes, guys I know I am a mangina. But at least I own it.

Speaking for myself, writing a review is a PITA.  Most of my reviews aren't all that great anyway and are kind of boring. I've had a few well received funny ones. My absolute best, hottest, wildest reviews are still in my head and I haven't reviewed those ladies, including my only unwritten 10+/10+ ATF.  And I do a lot of repeat visits with no need to re-review.  (Tami in NYC is retired.  I saw her at least 25x, maybe even 40x.)  

...the self-aggrandizing BS and the ridiculous grade inflation that has taken place over the years.  Providers who got 6-7 in looks 15 years ago are now getting 9-10.  Sure, there have been advances in plastic surgery but come on!  If I graded on a true scale, I'd be on every blacklist around.

Like GaG, I've "given back" to TER, but behind the scenes.  I have many years of free VIP to show for my work but that's not why I do it.  It's to help my fellow hobbyists, whether they realize it or not.

I consider my whitelists to be equivalent to reviews.  Any provider willing to whitelist someone without trading for a good review is an upstanding person in my book and worth seeing.

Many guys consider whitelists a "tit for tat" kind of thing, you give me a good review and I will give you a whitelist, which IMO sort of corrupts the whole system.

A whitelist without a review I guess is a "tit without a tat"  and as I am not a big fan of ink to begin with, I like my tits without tats. lol

I also love the irony when guys who give out nothing buy 9's and 10's rag on other guys for not reviewing, when their own reviews are completely worthless to the rest of us as their scale seems to start at 9. I can only imagine what a beast a woman would have to be to rate an 8 from some of these guys who get on their high fucking horses.

Frankly, the women who are outspoken turn me on, even as they express things that I don't necessarily want to hear.   I like HT's posts, even when they are not pleasant, because they confirm things that any of us who use our big noggin' should know

If I had similar health issues I'd still want to enjoy the intimacy, so I'd still hobby.  

It just seems like adolescent locker-room trash talk or egotistical "notch on the bedpost" self-aggrandizement in many cases.  

So by its omission I can only assume that when you have a great experience you choose not to review? So giving a positive review is adolescent locker room trash and to hell with all of us that would like to know if you had a great time with a particular hooker? Interesting point of view.

I have only one review posted now but I've submitted 4. Two of them got rejected for approval and I never went to the effort to do what they said I had to do to make them acceptable. One got posted and then the lady asked to be removed from the site based partly on my review. I actually didn't think it was a bad review but she had asked me to post a review because the previous reviewer had claimed her pictures were fake and I honestly couldn't say he was wrong because I also thought they were.  

generally they are ones we both think should be written!

For me not reviewing is not an option. Drug addled loon? Well, my fellow hobbyists need to know that. The time of my life.....You all should know that as well.  

From, what I see from your post is that your not really motivated to post reviews to help other hobbyists but I am sure you use our reviews to pick your hookers.

Well, I said I posted 4 reviews with 2 rejected and one disappearing so your accusation of not wanting to help out other hobbyists strikes me as totally full of ****.