When I submitted a review last week, I carefully checked to see if anything has changed in the requirements for giving above a "7". Yup.....Paragraph 7 reads the same: BBBJ, kisses with tongue, really bi, anal.
However, for months now I have been seeing "8" and even "9" ratings for gals who do nothing more than massage HJ. Apparently, in fact, there has been a change.
My vote: get rid of the "anal" and "really bi" requirements..... and the "merely has to be offered"......??? What was he thinking......that we would be walking in the door with a clipboard like a Census Taker?
My personal rating system: If CIM is on a lady's menu, that makes her eligible for a 10.
The requirements for scoring above a 7 seem now to be "de jure", not "de facto".
It just seems the better way to go for me. Plus I have my list of menu items I like. If I don't read those menuitems being offered, time after time in the juicy details, then I take a pass. Of course, every once in awhile things don't go according to plan.
Something to the effect that FBSM providers shouldn't be held to the same scoring standards as full service providers. I guess they pulled that line from the guidelines somewhere along the way. Apparently the policy is still the same though because they raised the score I submitted on an FBSM provider, lol.
for massage & PV. I'm not much into the massage happy ending scene , but have often remarked when done well a PV session can be exceptionally erotic & satisfying. But no....a 9or 10 performance for a PV experience can not have the same criteria of a FS session. I don't think the board has ever really addressed this reality.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!