Nope, don't really like it.  Sensation is the same but the problem is...it ends up covering a womans pussy/labia/vulva etc.  I like to see her lips engulfing me.  

so that a change of cover is not needed.....

they feel a little funny to me but are better than having to use too small a condom

other than that I prefer a Magnum Thin, a Vivid Large or a Bravo Wicked Thin Large condom.....

1) Are FC's preferable?  I'm inclined to say yes, but there are drawbacks...

2) Does the sensation differ?  Well, supposedly, these are supposed to feel more like BB.  And they do. It also did look better when going in doggie...I got to see met my wet member going in and out, but could also see the FC, so the visuals were kinda netted out...

3) Downsides?  The lady who used these had to reset it because it's easier for the FC to be pulled out of position.

4) Upsides from the ladies POV?  The FC, if used correctly, provides some coverage of the labia minora, possibly better the the MC.  But the FC is easier to dislodge than the MC, so you will have to pay attention to that fact...

5) Original post edit: FC's are definitely preferable during threesomes.  Reason is obvious...no need to put on a fresh condom if we are alternating FS between the two ladies.  

Conclusion: The FC is a viable alternative to standard condoms.  But you will have to vigilant that these do not become dislodged, and thus fail.

Have a good day, Rebekah.  Hope NYC is still on your list of cities to visit...  


-- Modified on 4/26/2009 4:48:34 AM

They feel so much more like BB that I don't have any problem finishing like I do with the male condom.  I would recommend them to anyone that has trouble finishing while covered.  I can see where they would be great with two girls at once also.  The only downside is the higher price and less availability.

as long as

1. The lady is familar with inserting them prior to the date. For some men, having to wait a few minutes as she inserts and adjusts can cause Junior to 'retreat'.

2. I was with a lady who used them, but would keep her hand down there making sure it didn't move and you were always inside it. If you don't trust the guy (him being careless or intentional), having a hand down there is a good idea. But it can be a major buzz kill to a guy (well, at least the ones who still have some thinking capacity upstairs versus the ones whose brains shut off when little head is engaged).

The female condom can be nice especially for 'girthy Juniors'. More realistic sensational along the whole penis. Until the newer latex ones come out (someone posted about them a couple weeks ago), the existing ones do make a little 'crinkle' sound.

How about from you ladies point of view, do you miss out on the friction?  Is it more or less enjoyable than the male condom in your experience?

Re: question for the gents about the female condom

I've ordered them from the CondonDepot online. Had my first experience with one last week and it really helped me "stay up" for the session. It's true that it takes the lady longer to insert than a MC takes a man but for those who have trouble staying hard with a male condom on, I highly recommend the FC.

Love 'em. sensation of BB without the risk. Sometimes they sound like saran wrap when the motion gets going, but overall, I'm a fan.

and I've seen two other ladys that use them.  Next best sensation to BB to me.

There are some news ones that don't have the "krinkly sound."

So far not mention:

Con: crackling noise with every trust is distracting

Pro: Because it cover labia/vulva site of asymptomatic viral shedding offers greater protection from Herpes2

Dear Rebekah:
I was just wondering how long you have been using the FC's and what type of temperature do you store them in so that they will be pliable during intercourse? Finally do they hold up during intense sessions of coitus from well endowed hobbyist? Also what do your clients say with respect to the hedonistic value as well?