Pretty much what 36363jensen has said.
Was the review helpful? Did it give you the information to make an informed decision to spend your time and money? Even if they forgot to spell check, used the wrong pronoun, had a lot of auto-correct (wrong ones), was it helpful? If you just gave up trying to figure out what happened, and what the overall session was like, then you probably didn't find it helpful. If the review sounds like her ad, then was it really helpful? Just saying everything is on the menu, doesn't tell if everything on the menu is worth it. That one raises the question if the reviewer actually got anything on the menu.What is a good review? No, this isn't a new thread on an old subject.
Go to the Let's Play board and let us and other members know if you have read a good review lately . See the details on the thread.
You could win some FREE VIP days!
By best, or good, are you referring to the quality of the session that the reviewer is relating, or do you mean the quality of the reviewer's writing?
There could be quite a difference.
Also, how recent does the review have to be?
MrFisher. They were limiting the reviews to those submitted the week of August 5 -12, with voting going another week.
As I read the plan they are looking for the quality of the review in terms of details and how well communicated -- clearly that can include both grammar, spelling and style but suspect most here would think informational content that was clear over prose gets more weight.
Check out the Let's Play board.
Pretty much what 36363jensen has said.
Was the review helpful? Did it give you the information to make an informed decision to spend your time and money?
Even if they forgot to spell check, used the wrong pronoun, had a lot of auto-correct (wrong ones), was it helpful? If you just gave up trying to figure out what happened, and what the overall session was like, then you probably didn't find it helpful.
If the review sounds like her ad, then was it really helpful? Just saying everything is on the menu, doesn't tell if everything on the menu is worth it. That one raises the question if the reviewer actually got anything on the menu.
Sometimes a slightly long narrative is interesting and useful; sometimes it is just plain boring. Some reviewers can sum up their session in 6 lines, giving a good summary of the events and services received.
You decide what makes the review good for you.
Speaking for myself (and many others too I think) I like a review to be about the girl being reviewed, not about the reviewer himself. Too bad TER software only allows "likes" and not "dislikes" I would love to see how many dislikes one of those cheap porn novels masquerading as a review would get if that we an option.
I think I actually "like" this contest, it might be helpful for the guys who write reviews to see what kind of reviews the other guys reading them actually prefer and maybe, just maybe it will help those writers of cheap porn to "see the light" and do more reviewing and less bragging when writing reviews.
If you ever shop for greeting cards (one of those things chicks expect) you'll see that some cards are about the sender and some are about the recipient. I'm sure reviews are written the same way.
Kind of fits with the old idea I had about allowing reviews be rated as well -- but for that be be useful it would need to focus on the meaningful content.
So I do hope this gets a good amount of participation in the voting stage -- and hopefully with some feedback on why the vote.
That said, I also thought -- and perhaps this could be a follow up game, if it can be done without mean spirited responses -- rating for entertainment value might be a fun option. Perhaps the game could focus on worst, silliest or "it's about you, not her!" categories. In this case the winning review might have some avatar attached to their logon (and not be able to hide behind an alias without admin approvals) rather than extra VIP days.
My reviews are the best, hands down.
sag
When you announced the contest, the window of opportunity to participate as a reviewer was closed the same day. If your motivation is to encourage more review writing, then I suggest you announce the "window" dates for writing a qualifying review two weeks in advance. I wrote four or five reviews the week before, because I tend to do them every few weeks in clusters. If I know the qualification dates are coming up rather than already passed, I would be happy to time my review-writing to coincide with the time frame.
and they also addressed the issue about idiots who can't seem to follow simple instructions, even when it's posted plainly on the subject line of the OP. I won't name names, but I am sure the idiots know who they are.
Back to your point, it looks like every week for the next few weeks will have it's own contest. Maybe a certain moocher who hasn't seen a hooker, much less fucked one, in over a decade may still be able to get a shill post in for his fellow libtard.
Just take the hint and let it go. At least for these TER originating threads.
You have plenty of other post you can resume on. How about it?
-- Modified on 8/16/2020 9:34:18 PM
Nominate the best review submitted between Aug 5-Aug 12.
Be sure to vote if you agree with any of the nominations.
Go to the 'Let's Play' discussion board for more information.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
