I have been under the impression that one could it discuss a delisted provider.
Now today a delisted provider ( Nicole_Marlee) has posted on a thread about her more then once and stating how she gets buy just fine as a provider without having reviews here.  
Should the original thread be allowed and also the same for her posts?
An inquiring mind would line to know.

But she certainly likes to advertise her site. One would think if she had no use of this place as she claims, she wouldn’t be here. All above my pay grade.

Seems like it is they who were wrong.

But I already knew this.

It is written in the guidelines for posting.  
Discussion of delisted providers / agencies isn’t allowed (except for ripoffs, robs, etc.)  
Now we not only have delisted provider discussed but with multiple posts.

More proof that simps and doormats only cite the rules when it's convenient for them.

Not a single one of resident seller defenders thinks of it as a problem.

More proof that delisted providers on ter is ust a loophole to avoid criticism online. Or at least, avoid criticism on ter.

 
Will they ever stand up for this? Of course not, they're always on their knees.