TER General Board

Re: one and two hour date difference..
Cazbah 29 Reviews 513 reads
posted

Totally agree.  I've actually started 90 minutes and those have been excellent as well. The hour is just too short.

Other than the obvious difference in the time....
I have booked a couple of two hour date for the first time. I would be interested in how hobbyists and providers compare these to 1 hour appointments. Is the chemistry different? The pace? I imaging it's probably a similar amount of intimate activity, with more time added for conversation, but I'd like to hear others's opinions. Which do you prefer?  Thanks?

gained experience in the P4P world, I have found that I enjoy 2-hr. (or longer) dates if I have chemistry with the lady.

I still enjoy 1-hr. dates when I am meeting someone new or if I am absolutely pressed for time and can only be "away" for the 1 hour.

1 hour is rushed when meeting someone for the 1st time.  Chemistry does not happen instantly.  

Brunch, lunch, &/or dinner dates are my ATF because you really get to know a person by conversing over a fine meal.

But I will buy the bull crap about "liking" to do bruches, lunches, and dinners to develop good chemistry, when they do it OTC..

Now, I will go as far as have a 90 min minimum, so as to provide good service in order to have a solid reputation in the community. I will definitely buy that, but that's as far as I will go....

I just have found in the one hour appointments I don't get into as much. It's quite nerve racking to meet someone new and then basically just perform within 5 minutes. It's unnatural to me. I'm trying to balance this with my desire not to throw my money away. In the end, however, I have found in my non-hobby endeavours that when I spend more money, my experiences are usually much better. I guess I'm figuring it will work the same in this world.  
As far as ladies liking more money, I'm sure they do, but I can't completely call BS. Given my previous experiences, I imagine I'll be more likely to repeat if I spend a little more time initially. Which in the long run is more money, even if I only book one hours after that. I imagine its a little easier on the provider to make a good first impression.
That being said, I imagine more money is better too. I would think a 2 hour appt with one guy is much easier than two one hour appointments with different guys, even though the money is more likely the same.
There are lots of times I love my job, but it doesn't mean I also don't like money and wouldn't love more. The two are not mutually exclusive.
He'll, maybe I'll try the 2 hour appointments and decide that's not enough...

I want my dates to feel like dates, not a quick dental exam with some drilling.  Over ten years now and I looooove my "work".  How can that happen?  I insist on enjoying the time too!  Creating a connection, building the energy, being able to trade massage, soak in a hot tub and chat, and some exceptional orgasms... sorry, there is no way for half of that to happen in an hour.

As to more money?  Sure, the point of more money per session by encouraging longer sessions is so that I can work less.  Working less lowers the stress and risk of meeting someone new, and enables me to put more time and energy into each meeting, making each meeting even more special...  It's a win-win.

.02

-- Modified on 10/28/2013 8:55:02 AM

Its part and parcel of the "Girl Friend Experience" package you are selling..

But at the core..its just that.. Good Business. Which, BTW, I am perfectly fine with....

And telling us that you just loveeeeeeeeeee this business..Is also a small and sometimes big part of GFE package..

That's the difference. If everyone of us could make 2k per date, um, we would be doing it. You can love your job all you want, but anyone saying they don't want more money for a service provided is either full of shit, or has something wrong with their head. My Doctor loves his job too, but I bet if he got a raise he would not turn it down. He might do more probono work, but he would probably still take the money. Why? Because if he has more money, that's more money to help the less fortunate. If he can feed his family easier, he can use some of that extra to give to others in need.  

If the gals who really loved fkin were the ones getting all 10s, you might have a point...that is rarely the case. In fact, women who don't even like doing this job at all, are often rated higher than the proclaimed nymphos. Um, how does that happen exactly? ACTING, that's how lol.

it takes me 1 hr and 59 min to get hard and 1 min to pop.

I am not speaking in absolutes here, so no one get all butt hurt, but the MAJORITY through 10 years of research has revealed this...

1. Most guys who ONLY book hourly appts. are the hardest to please, want the most for their buck, and grade the hardest in reviews...they are also the ones who need a lesson in hygiene. I said MOST.

2. Most hourly guys are self entitled and treat us like shit...save a few of the older guy on TER who obviously do not act that way...take a look at guybeingaguy's posts in a thread below, and you have the attitude displayed by the hourly and half hour guys.

3. Hourly guys 'rarely' tip or buy gifts, not that it's expected, but it is an observation.

4. Guys who book multi-hour dates are more relaxed, take time to actually TALK to a provider, will take her to dinner on the clock, and don't expect to go over time, because they were smart enough to book enough of it to begin with!

5. From my observations, and all women will have different experiences, guys who spend the MOST expect the least. The most trashy reviews are always by guys who are cheap and cruise BP for the bargain girls, then expect her to entertain in a 5 star hotel, and serve them like a slave.

I have been in EVERY price point, every market, have ran an agency, and screened for women of all price points and time minimums as well. Take a look at my reviews from 2008-2010...that's when I offered an hour. Look how many complaints I got compared to 2011-2013 when I upped my rate and time min. The difference is CLEAR. Keep in mind, I changed NOTHING about my services or incall locations, nor did I look any better. In fact, I looked better back then but my scores in looks are higher NOW.  I had the same incall options, same driver service, and offered the same type of date experience from day one, including expensive wine and champagne, cooking, etc. but it was not appreciated all that much by guys only looking for a perfect 10 and someone who was 100 pounds to let them run the gambit of positions like a fkin monkey.  

If you read the boards long enough, there is a clear mentality displayed from guys who are bottom feeders vs. those who are into the entire date. Guys who think it's gross to kiss and go down on hookers, are the very guys who don't spend money. Guys who spend more money, seem to also care about her enjoyment or they could easily find someone for a hundred bucks to get the job done. I have never worked harder as an escort, than I did when I charged by the hour. My average dinner date of 4 hours, is usually 2 pops from the guy...hourly guys expect that EVERY damn time in 60 min.  

Now, not many women are going to come here and bitch about their hourly clients when they charge by the hour lol, or they would lose business, so do keep that in mind.  

Does that answer your question? LOL.

 



-- Modified on 10/28/2013 11:07:47 AM

Thanks for the well thought out reply. I imagine here will be some Butthurt, but that's why I like reading your posts. Maybe I'll make it to Florida one day.

Posted By: London Rayne
I am not speaking in absolutes here, so no one get all butt hurt, but the MAJORITY through 10 years of research has revealed this...  
   
 1. Most guys who ONLY book hourly appts. are the hardest to please, want the most for their buck, and grade the hardest in reviews...they are also the ones who need a lesson in hygiene. I said MOST.  
   
 2. Most hourly guys are self entitled and treat us like shit...save a few of the older guy on TER who obviously do not act that way...take a look at guybeingaguy's posts in a thread below, and you have the attitude displayed by the hourly and half hour guys.  
   
 3. Hourly guys 'rarely' tip or buy gifts, not that it's expected, but it is an observation.  
   
 4. Guys who book multi-hour dates are more relaxed, take time to actually TALK to a provider, will take her to dinner on the clock, and don't expect to go over time, because they were smart enough to book enough of it to begin with!  
   
 5. From my observations, and all women will have different experiences, guys who spend the MOST expect the least. The most trashy reviews are always by guys who are cheap and cruise BP for the bargain girls, then expect her to entertain in a 5 star hotel, and serve them like a slave.  
   
 I have been in EVERY price point, every market, have ran an agency, and screened for women of all price points and time minimums as well. Take a look at my reviews from 2008-2010...that's when I offered an hour. Look how many complaints I got compared to 2011-2013 when I upped my rate and time min. The difference is CLEAR. Keep in mind, I changed NOTHING about my services or incall locations, nor did I look any better. In fact, I looked better back then but my scores in looks are higher NOW.  I had the same incall options, same driver service, and offered the same type of date experience from day one, including expensive wine and champagne, cooking, etc. but it was not appreciated all that much by guys only looking for a perfect 10 and someone who was 100 pounds to let them run the gambit of positions like a fkin monkey.  
   
 If you read the boards long enough, there is a clear mentality displayed from guys who are bottom feeders vs. those who are into the entire date. Guys who think it's gross to kiss and go down on hookers, are the very guys who don't spend money. Guys who spend more money, seem to also care about her enjoyment or they could easily find someone for a hundred bucks to get the job done. I have never worked harder as an escort, than I did when I charged by the hour. My average dinner date of 4 hours, is usually 2 pops from the guy...hourly guys expect that EVERY damn time in 60 min.  
   
 Now, not many women are going to come here and bitch about their hourly clients when they charge by the hour lol, or they would lose business, so do keep that in mind.  
   
 Does that answer your question? LOL.  
   
   
   
 

-- Modified on 10/28/2013 11:07:47 AM

There are many hourly clients who do not apply to my theory, so it is not always the TIME they buy, but who they are and how they approach the business. Guys can still book 2 hours and want nothing but sex...look at CPA bwahhahaa. So, there is more of a difference between guys who ONLY book for sex, and those who book to take a gal to dinner, watch her sleep, etc. and the time min. may not always have something to do with that. Many guys who book hours can only afford that, so for those guys, I would not hold the same theory, as they are still nice guys, but on a budget. They are happy with one pop and making that hour last, vs. trying to pound a gal to death getting 2 plus pops.  

So, there is not a huge difference in 1 hour and 2 hour appts. but yes, there is a difference. I would more say hourly and guys who do dinner dates are where we see a HUGE difference. Also, I do not offer more than 2 hours of playtime...I simply don't. Anything above two hours is a dinner date or an overnight with understood sleep time, dinner time, sex time, etc. This is the very reason I will NEVER offer playtime AFTER dinner. I want to make sure the guy has a FULL two hours of play, so I don't get reviews saying, "That bitch charged me  a grand and burned up 2.5 hours at dinner."  

There is no back and forth shit either....it is understood that half is play time in the beginning, and the other half is IN PUBLIC! I've only had maybe 2 guys try the old, "Can I walk you to your room and get some more" after dinner, and they were kindly (LMAO) told "Sorry, I can't fk after I am drunk and you just fed me a bowl of pasta and bread." I want to enjoy being able to savor a meal if I am going to do a dinner date in the first place, and damn right I want to enjoy the sex first! I am not going to eat like a bird because I am worried about having to fk a guy for the next two hours, then having to order room service after he leaves to actually satisfy me.  

-- Modified on 10/28/2013 12:26:57 PM

GaGambler610 reads

I don't, I pay for sex, pure and simple. Don't get me wrong, i like the company of a woman, I enjoy having dinner dates, sleeping in the arms of a beautiful woman etc, but what I pay for is the sex. I don't have the slightest problem getting someone to let me buy them dinner, I just don't see the need to pay for it.

That said, I probably do more overnight dates than anyone here on TER, I've had three in the last four nights, but the rate I am paying is so absurdly low by American standards as to be meaningless to me. (I've paid on average $300 for my overnight dates), and yes they will fuck me after dinner as well. sorry LR. Actually some of the time we just order room service and eat it in bed, a few crumbs in the bed doesn't bother me too much. lol

Lucky devil...overnights for 300? I would not even show you my tits for that lol. Well, maybe if you get me drunk. :)

GaGambler493 reads

which is just fine by me.

It's funny, I don't mind a bit running up a thousand dollar bar or dinner tab, but the idea of paying some woman hundreds of dollars an hour just to "keep me company" bothers me for some reason. The same way as I won't bat an eye at a hundred dollar steak in a restaurant as long as the quality is there, but if that same steak is thirty dollars a pound in the market, No fucking way!!! I guess we all have our own way of looking at things.

and yeah, you and I can get drunk together anytime, even if you are a bit "pudgy" roflmfao

and yes, if you hadn't noticed I am already PUI.

I agree with you which is why I always go with the option of seeing one gentleman for a nice longer length date once a week over seeing 15 guys in a week at an hour each. Not to say I don't have my regular favorites that I always try to accomodate but that's rare  ;)

89Springer617 reads

I cant meet someone, chat a bit to get to know her and be comfortable, and then get an idea of how compatible we'll be sexually in an hour. I really can't do it in two hours. In two hours I can at least tell if I really want to see her again.  

If that goes well, then I'll go three hours for the second "date" and see how that goes. If that goes well, then I'll do three or four for the next, as that's when we're both comfortable (or should be) with each other, and the fun really begins.

I was like that in "civvie" life, too. Sex on the first date was never good or at least as good as it was after a few dates.

ismellturkey568 reads

I've had clients where they should've booked 2 hours because time flew by so fast with them while some appointments I have we still get along well but anything longer than an hour is a bit drawn out.  

Normally, if a new client ever requests an appointment longer than 2 hours, I only let them book two hours max. I worry that he may be bored for so many hours if he ends up not liking me.

I agree with LONDON and have a few points to add.....

1. If you read my website you will see that I PREFER to see NEW clients for at least 2 hours. The reason being is that I pride myself on the service that I give and prefer to have a true and genuine expereince.

2. If you look at my review scores, MORE OFTEN than NOT, the gentleman that i had 2 or more hour dates score me as 9 & 10 and the 1 hour dates are ranged from 7-9 usually. Why is that the same case over and over again?? As London said previously it is often the guys booking the 1 hour date expecting the 5 star experience but with no time to get to know each other at all?

3. Now granted I like to believe that I give the same service no matter what...but sadly it's not possible. If I have the time to sit and talk with you and get to know your likes and dislikes and a feel of who you are and what you like..then I'm going to perform better...especially if we have the TIME to do so!

4. Now that being said after I have had this expereince with clients I have had them book dates that were less than 2 hours but half the time I already know what they like, or they are just in a rush that day and want to be pleased like only I know how =)

Don't get me wrong...I have had great dates that were less than 2 hours, sometimes chemistry is just there and it can ignite true passion in you (those are the best) but let's be real...it takes time to REALLY know how to PLEASE your lover =)

So my advice is to look at the advice the PROVIDERS are giving you..We are basically telling you what you can expect so... definately book at least 2 hours with a provider that you haven't met!

xoxoxo
Tina

-- Modified on 10/28/2013 11:32:27 AM

-- Modified on 10/28/2013 11:39:54 AM

Yup, exactly. I can perform the same acronyms in an hour, but I cannot provide the same type of service. An hour will never be a GFE to me...never. It's a fkin PSE unless the guy is old as hell and nuts in 10 min. then wants to cuddle and chat for the next 50 min. Trying to jam in a million actvities with only time for 10 min. of chit chat while you wipe cum off your face, is NOT GFE.

......going by. I have more than enough time to enjoy the moment, with plenty of talk and foreplay. One hour meetings are always hurried for me, like I am going to miss out on something, or it just flies by and ends abruptly. I would love to see what a three hour date is like, and hope to do one soon.

tg_baby518 reads

I used to, though. I only see two clients who originally booked me for 1-hour time slots. One is just really nice and very attached to me...the other one started with a 1-hour date but then booked longer dates after that short first one. Both are exceptions to the general rule. Most 1-hour clients will never book anything else. They think that they pay for the hour, and everything else should be free (including cuddle time and even post-coital massage). Their attitude is that they pay for SEX, and generally, as London pointed out...they will work you like a team of oxen. Yes.

Advertising at a higher minimum, my most popular dates are 3-hour, 4-hour, and 6-8 hours. When I advertised 1-hours, I generally did 1 or 2 hour dates with very few exceptions...many guys wanted 3 hours, but didn't want to pay (lol).  

Men who book longer dates tend to look at the date as a special occasion. They want to stay in a nice hotel, enjoy great food and wine, listen to exceptional music, maybe go to theater, have a great conversation, and yes, enjoy amazing sex as well as gratis touches like a luxe toy chest and a non-perfunctory massage :) They want to chat beforehand about common interests - music, literature, and travel are things I frequently discuss with clients in emails,  before the date. They really want to indulge themselves...but also, they want to savor the experience as a whole, and not just the sex.

With that said, I don't look at a 2-hour date as much different than a 1-hour...usually it's pretty much the same kind of appointment. Maybe a bit more time to chat...actually, a lot of guys who used to book 2-hour wanted two pops, or took a long time cumming. Only occasionally did they book that particular date because they wanted to build some chemistry.

I'd think of doing 1-hours again...only because I did meet some great clients that way. I'd hate to think that I'd have missed out meeting a really nice guy who was tentative about going longer on a first date. But, you can't please everybody, I guess.

-- Modified on 10/28/2013 8:56:43 AM

One hour does feel rushed, and if can not get off twice in one hour, but in two hours I can usually do so.

Plus most gals structure their rates to make two hours more affordable.  

I enjoy the company and conversation about as much as the sex with many gals I see.

I made a rule with myself that when I see a lady for the first time it's a one hour date. I've been with ladies for the first time for 2 hours and kind of regretted it, because we didn't hit it off on a personal level or she wasn't as advertised. Ever since I made that rule with myself I've wished I'd booked longer with first dates. I suspect that I'm getting better at choosing providers for myself, everyone's tastes and expectations are different. So, my preference is 2 or more hours, more play time and a more relaxed date.

NO reason for a guy to waste one hour, much less two on someone he does not want to be with.

While it is certainly possible to hit it off well on a 1 hr date for the first time, 1.5 -2 hr dates for me are the bee's knees in terms of pacing. It just allows the date to unfold organically and leisurely ; however,  It does not matter if the date is 1 or 2 -chemistry is chemistry :-)

In most cases, the latter. I'm not seeing my providers to be my girl friend.

My first thought in this was that it seemed silly to drop a bunch of money on someone if never met or even seen in real life. The risk of a dud just seemed to big. But then thinking about it, my experiences with the one hour were lacking. Also, I think that ladies that are more amenable to multi-hour appointments are probably more into what I am looking for. "Pops" are nice, but much more fun in the context of getting to know someone. At least for me. I'm definitely not looking for a girlfriend, but I certainly am not there just to do the deed and leave.  Nothing against that, and it might be ok with someone I was familiar with, but it has been to hard to get into it for one hour.  
This discussion has made me think I should up it to 3+ hours, but I suppose I should not get carried away.!
Thanks for all the advice.

It gives you time for catching up, maybe relaxing with a drink and 2 or 3 pops. I find (as others have said) the more you give the more you get. I usually feel rushed with a one hour date, and Im only there to feel good and have fun

89Springer449 reads

At the end of each of the last four 3-hour sessions I've had, I asked the lady if she could go another hour.  She wasn't able to.  

It doesn't matter if I can't get it up anymore at that point. I'd would have been happy to just lay there and caress her for another hour

MojoRizon470 reads

I like to take a shower first, then chat for a bit. Gives you enough time for a couple rounds and chit chat in between. One hour is too rushed. Sometimes I will go for one hour if I'm seeing an agency girl or someone with not many reviews for the first time. I've had times where I booked two hours and wish I didn't, left early at 1.5 hrs.

I booked my guy a four hour dinner date for his first time. He liked making a connection on a personal level and found the physical play more enjoyable for it. This is about fantasy and I wanted the whole package for him. That said, I spent A LOT of time researching. I took everything you guys have taught me and applied it. Didn't worry about price, instead paid attention to chemistry and sexual appeal. When the provider was booked I was confident our choice was a good one.  It was a very good date.

I really do not care or want to work that hard to pop twice.

If there were a 50 minute session, that would be better.

Depends on my mood but I'm usually too busy for 2 hours.

I am in. But, haven’t found anyone yet. All want to lay around and talk and get know each other. For what?

On a second meeting I sometimes do longer.

work for your money, I like that.

After all this IS a business right?

transaction.

we want sex, they want money for it.

 

Posted By: vanco
Other than the obvious difference in the time....  
 I have booked a couple of two hour date for the first time. I would be interested in how hobbyists and providers compare these to 1 hour appointments. Is the chemistry different? The pace? I imaging it's probably a similar amount of intimate activity, with more time added for conversation, but I'd like to hear others's opinions. Which do you prefer?  Thanks?

I'm a relative newbie but I've never booked less than 90 minutes and that was when I lost my "cherry".  For me, it's both.  Obviously I wouldn't be there without the shared fun time but I find that I really enjoy the conversation and getting to know the young lady with whom I'm visiting.  I've found them all to be intriguing, interesting, and of of course very friendly.  

All of my visits since that first one have been for 2 hours even with a new friend.  They have been very fun, engaging, educational, and naturally come with a certain amount of physical exercise.  Have I been lucky and not had a bad experience?  Certainly to some degree that is true and I may someday have not as fun experience, but so goes life.  It doesn't always work out the way you plan it.  

I'm very thankful for the information available through sites such as this which make me capable of making a well informed decision regarding who I choose to see and hopefully who agree to see me.  So far I'm batting 1.000 or a little better than David Ortiz in this World Series!  

I've never been a slam, bam, thank you m'am and out the door guy anyway.  Not even back in my "glory years" as a college student.  It seems to me that the ladies are more relaxed with a planned multi-hour and appreciate a gentleman being a gentleman.  The 2 hours shows a commitment to the lady that you are willing to invest the time to get them know them too.  I think a couple of the ladies have done a good job in this thread sharing those same opinions.  

I hope to continue my streak and have my first 3 hour visit later this week.  This is with a new lady that I reached out to after having spent considerable time on TER doing research.  I believe that my research and the multi hour engagement will prove to be well worth the time and effort.  

I know that I will certainly have to tune in to see what London has say!  She's definitely helping me get a couple of laughs reading through the GD board

when I first started  I tried multi hour dates with a few ladies and got stood up more than once (cancelled on) so it soured me to them.  I've had a few since then but  I don't see the value in it since I end up paying her to talk. I can talk to friends, I don't need an escort for that.

1 hour dates are 60 minutes.
2 hour dates are 120 minutes.

1 hour dates cost less
2 hour dates cost more

Hope this helps.

I've been hobbying just under 9 months and I have yet to take an hour. I hate the rushed feeling. Its like some of the gals here say...sometimes it takes a while to get comfortable before the festivities begin. The way I see it..a provider is a provider. Either you can make her feel like a provider...or you can make her feel like like a person, by taking the time to get to know her a bit. Not just the superficial banter I'm sure goes on, but to really get to know her and she gets that you really do want to know her. The gals are sharp enough to know if you're laying it on or you really are sincere in your conversation. She's not just a sex object. Not only does it enrich the session and make it better than just a quick lay...though I know that is exactly what some are looking for. Nothing wrong with that, I just don't happen to roll like that.  

I've also done the longer dinner dates plus session...with sufficient time for digestion. :-)  I've also been fortunate to actually have met  providers where we can just hang out. Off the clock. I know the deal. If they're cool enough to be open to hanging out..having a dinner date or catching a movie or just hanging out...off the clock...I know not to play the game with them of trying to get them in the sack afterwards. I appreciate the fact that they're actually open enough to being friends outside the business and I don't push my luck. It makes future sessions even better because with those...I know its not just about money..so it makes me wanting to have future sessions even more likely, with them knowing that they are pretty much guaranteed a multiple hour session. You give a little you get a little.  

I know it goes contrary to what a lot of providers believe, but neither I nor the providers who have actually become good friends and still provide have found a happy medium.  I mean...if a gal is off the clock...nothing scheduled...why the hell not hang out with someone she actually is cool with. I may not even be in the mood for playtime, but I might be up for hanging out with a great gal. Believe me...I'll eventually get in the mood on some other day.  

I know for a lot of providers and clients as well..its just business...and thats cool...it is what it is,.but its one thing to say the person is a cool person...its another thing when that cool person says..you know what...you're really cool...I wouldn't mind hanging with you sometime...and they actually mean it. Now THAT's a cool person.

or presents... (-:

But honestly.. either amount of time, which is preferable depends on the man I'm spending time with- what he is like.   What our time together is like.  I've enjoyed a man but felt one hour was all I really wanted to spend with him becuz of his style and how we inter-relate.  other men I could spend a weekend with and want more.    
Either time amount can be enjoyable or an experience not worth reliving for any amount of money.

Of course the fun men who buy either amount and add extras on top of it all...  
ARE MY FAVORITES... xx

-- Modified on 10/29/2013 9:11:27 AM

I think it is great that there were actually some real, thoughtful responses to this question.

I absolutely understand why London and Tina take the position that they take -- any service is better when it is well thought out and prepared for...the first half hour of a two hour session is prep time for the "awesome" time to follow.

BUT, many, many providers don't have rates that really reflect that they prefer longer appointments.  The simple fact is that most providers charge quite a bit more per hour than top-of-the-line lawyers and money doesn't grow on trees.  Hobbyists have limited resources and $350+ per hour is, in itself, a daunting number for most hobbyists.  If providers really need 90 minutes or two hours to be at their best, or to give service that they are proud of, then their multi-hour rates would reflect this.  But they don't -- most 90 min or 2 hour rates are only a modest discount (notice, London, that I said "most") from the hourly rate.  If multi-hour is the best for providers, then that rate might best be set at a great price -- from the provider prospective is $400 an hour better, or is $550 or $600 for two hours better?  Pricing structures for most women indicate the one hour is better.

The conclusion that I have drawn is to go for the hour in a first appointment (and treat the lady well with interest in her needs and a small gift) and save any excess hobbying funds for extra time with ladies that I hit it off with.  Interestingly, my three worst appointments ever were all 90 minutes or two hours.  That extra $700 is money I could use now to have a "rushed" hour with a top-100 lady or two hours with either of my ATFs.

I'm with HH -- one hour for first dates, then extend, or rebook, or find another playmate.

One hour dates go by toooo quick...and it can feel like a wham bam type of date.
(okay for those who are into the who wham bam thing) or Okay for those who are on a time/budget crunch.

two hour date....allows for.....more exploring of each other and simply more time to get to know and ENJOY your date. And sometimes a 2hour date tends to run longer. Especially if two parties have a *connection*.

Some of the best lovers are the lovers whom I've explored and enjoyed in 2 hours or longer.....

 

 

Posted By: vanco
Other than the obvious difference in the time....  
 I have booked a couple of two hour date for the first time. I would be interested in how hobbyists and providers compare these to 1 hour appointments. Is the chemistry different? The pace? I imaging it's probably a similar amount of intimate activity, with more time added for conversation, but I'd like to hear others's opinions. Which do you prefer?  Thanks?

Totally agree.  I've actually started 90 minutes and those have been excellent as well. The hour is just too short.

Register Now!