Dear Ms. Moore:
I was wondering does numbers always equal experience or sometimes does it mean that he has been doing it the wrong way and habits are fully ingrained? How much stock and credence would you put into this as a civilian and a provider?

-- Modified on 5/30/2011 3:06:09 PM

-- Modified on 5/30/2011 3:28:15 PM

In the meantime, thanks for the last-minute snicker I enjoyed from the following: "the sub thread below about planned / versus spontaneous success got me to updating my stats spreadsheet"

no extra charge!

my humor is very very dry and you snickered at the right place.

What better way to reduce human encounters down to a number.  

Have you produced a bar chart, or a pivot table? Or, maybe pie chart would be more apropos?

but you err nonetheless. i certainly do not reduce human encounters to a number. but there are some numbers of _mine_ that i must track.

i hobby for stress reduction and my health. i keep track of several numbers that i measure almost daily. i do correlate the beneficial effects of my meetings with who provides the service, what kind of service it was, etc. so that i know who and what works best for me. this way, although it is more expensive than just taking drugs, i minimize the meds and have some fun too.

simple line graphs do quite nicely.

i also do not depersonalize my lady friends as you suggest. i remain in sometimes daily, sometimes weekly contact with a lovely and kind retired lady. my current favorite is very good people as well as gorgeous and supremely skilled. i like her and trust her.

but i've had some unpleasant drama also with others.

so your assumptions about what i am doing and why, simply do not apply. why be so negative? that's rhetorical. i don't need an answer.

But then again, Claudius, you and I have friends here for many years. Even before Gambler and LP were mods. Remember that...?!

In any case, I can appreciate your accomplishment.

Cheers to you, brother! Here's looking forward to the next 100!

-- Modified on 5/30/2011 3:04:17 PM

your pictures are lovely. your website is interesting.

and a wonderful 100th meeting it was. i'd been on hiatus for just a bit....

about the mods.... yeah. we do go back before GaG and LP.

remember Jazz32 and DC.? i just checked their profiles and they've been inactive long time. hope they're OK......

I had this great reply but it got lost in the TER cloud. Hope it does not show up.

In a nut shell, I don't put stock or credence in "numbers". As the OP states further down, I would have to assume I knew what the definition of a "number" is. I wouldn't make that assumption no matter how much logical sense the "number" seemed to be.

I put stock and credence in different things like a client's past reviews. Show me a client who does an honest review. To me there are 4 different kinds of reviews. There are lies, fairy tales, the facts, and then there are the GREAT ones.

I want you to tell the truth and convey what was on the menu.  I want to see how it was delivered and how well it was delivered. When I see you discern the difference in work versus enthusiasm and then weave that into a short erotic tale, you are the client I want. That's a GREAT review; spicy but honest and truthful. I look at everyone's reviews, how you review is what I feel is important.

Reviews are just one thing I put stock and credence in. It's like a fine meal. It has many components.  

I think its great that he has hit 100 of whatever. Because it simply proves that there are many quality companions out there or he would have quit at 50.


-- Modified on 5/30/2011 9:34:31 PM

the 100 was for encounters. i tend to be a repeat client, when there is a connection, so 80% of those encounters were with 7 ladies. more than 60% were with only 3.

the ladies with whom i find some personal connection are very effective for me. the greater the connection, the better the numbers are that i monitor for my health.