or negatively?  Would you set limitations on what services were allowed such as no bbjcim or no greek?  Would it be important to you that she saw established providers, even though it cost more?  Would it bother you if she saw more than one at a time?

I would have scribbled out my name on the marriage license, written in his and said, "here, asshole. She's yours."

now I have grounds for divorce and taking custody of the kids with little or no alimony.  It would no longer be cheaper to keep her.  I could trade her in for a younger model who actually liked to have sex more than once or twice a month.

I doubt a girl I'm dating would even need to pay a guy for sex.  Most good looking girls don't need to pay,  that would hurt their girl ego.  

I don't think most guys would be ok with a woman who they truly care about, and love, to sleep with other men under any circumstance.

...to find out your wife, who hasn't blown you in a decade, is paying some dude for the privilege of blowing him BBCIM.  Ouch!

can you not know his story?

she started to date other guys openly.

I was all for it.  We had already come to the conclusion that sex between us wasn't working.

She had her thing and I had mine.

It also kept her from grabbing more of my stuff during the divorce as I had all the names and phone numbers.

be Positively horrified.     A lot of men's wives ARE seeing a gigolo.  Their Personal Trainer and HE is paying of fit.  Sorry guys, but its the truth.  Those personal trainers sleep with more of their married female clientele than you would want to believe

Do they have reviews?  Like a special little section on Angie's list... lmao

hypocrisy such a post elicits.

I'd be mad as hell and all hell would break loose.
But if I found out that she was seeing a FEMALE provider, well then all is forgiven and how about a 3some!

hiring one for my ex-wife.  I thought it might make her a little nicer.  But I couldn't bring myself to do that to a male provider.  

It's only hypocrisy if we're talking about identical situations and the guy condemns his wife for doing what he has done.  In many cases, the wife would have an unlimited supply of sex from her spouse if she wanted it, but she doesn't want it.  Not the case with the husband.  He would likely prefer to have his needs met by his wife, but instead he is forced to choose either infidelity or forgoing a basic human need.  Not the same, and not hypocrisy.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who just skims through most posts and only read in detail if the posts are from people I'm closer 'board friends' with or have some communication going on. Too many posts on these boards. That isn't to say that I don't find 89jerryspringer's posts interesting. Should be apparent that at I least read his recent posts entirely.  

I'd be shocked beyond words that my wife would see male providers... for many reasons which I don't need to or want to go into here.