If you want to be honest and above board why not also call out the people that apparently are driving the problem to begin with by ignoring the requirements stated by the lady. Seems like if they just read the requirements and honored them this would not be happening. Why is it some here are more than happy to call out guys who are willing to pay a price they are not happy about but almost never mention poor behavior by guys that produce undesirable results for them?
As for deposits or paying for screening, who really cares, People will pay or not as they wish. If the requirement for contacting a provider is to commit to seeing her and scheduling an appointment, and that a large majority will keep, is a problem don't see such providers.
the fees really began. Deposits were just the beginning.
Stefania 🐈💕
@Stefania_Canada
·
10h
Does anyone have any luck charging screening fees?
My booking form states clearly "Don't contact until you're ready to commit to a day and time", yet I get people filling out who aren't ready, serious, and/or ghost after I've done admin.
If you book, fee is applied to deposit.
to find an example to fit your narrative? Does that mean there are no girls charging a screening fee in the US?
that if it works, could travel to the US.
BTW, would you stop taking pot shots at everything I say?
My intent is well above-board in terms of trying to help others avoid hooker bad practices - current and developing.
There is nothing new about this practice that you are trying to shed light on that we don't already know. Some folks will never pay deposit, some will.. I will never pay.. Your intention might be honest and sincere, but it's old news to most of us. The screening fees are just an extension of deposits..
-- Modified on 12/22/2022 10:11:18 AM
It's an added fee on top of the deposit, so it's another bite at the apple. Just one more way guys get fleeced. I hope it stays in Canada.
I'm not sure you've read the ops post.
It talked about screening fee on top of a deposit fee.
I've never heard of a screening fee here, but I'm out of the loop with indie providers nowadays
If you want to be honest and above board why not also call out the people that apparently are driving the problem to begin with by ignoring the requirements stated by the lady. Seems like if they just read the requirements and honored them this would not be happening. Why is it some here are more than happy to call out guys who are willing to pay a price they are not happy about but almost never mention poor behavior by guys that produce undesirable results for them?
As for deposits or paying for screening, who really cares, People will pay or not as they wish. If the requirement for contacting a provider is to commit to seeing her and scheduling an appointment, and that a large majority will keep, is a problem don't see such providers.
"but almost never mention poor behavior by guys that produce undesirable results for them?
"
Sounds like pot calling kettle black, Jensen,when you never complain about providers complaining and take the providers side 98% of the time (when the normal distribution would effectively show that isn't realistic or close to truthful distribution of blame). But when guys complain about something in providers side instead of addressing the issue...you shift the blame to mongers, and - often - goalposts themselves.
they are right on target to expose some of the misleading shit you are trying to peddle here, just like this one when your example was in Canada, not here. I challenged you to supply proof that this is something happening in the US that guys here should be worried about. Instead, you got your panties in a bunch over being exposed. The questions I ask will be designed to test your cred, that's all. Either you have the answers to back up what you are saying, or you don't, and you will melt down a little, like now. It's not complicated.
People are already suspicious of threads started by those using an alias. Why is THIS such a controversial subject that you felt you had to use your alias to discuss it, unless of course, you are talking about something that doesn't exist in the general pussy market in the US, and you are just looking to fear-monger to the gullible people here. If you want to be taken seriously, why not start your threads under your username and not your alias?
...Walmart is always hiring.
I've never paid deposit, never will.
Screening fee? You mean they pay me???
-- Modified on 12/23/2022 9:59:58 AM
I don't have specific examples because I don’t keep track of it, but I've run across some providers on Twitter who charged a screening fee whenever I reviewed their websites.
Every once and a while, I've seen providers on Twitter posting about charging clients a screening fee.
The first GFE provider I saw used a well known scheduler out of Boston and charged X for an hour /
All visits after that were X -50 .
Betty if you are watching this board thank you for clearing me for some of the finest sessions ever.
The current government is determined to drive our country deep into a rescission and they are succeeding. As the money supply tightens up things will change. Deposits and screening fees along with other unrealistic things will disappear as the need for good cash paying customers increases.
Here TER has created a way for mongers to hide their identity in order to avoid repressions by providers who can't take negative feedback as well as they can take dicks... and giving mongers ability to talk everything surrounding providers and their biz with less fear of being outed.
Yet some try to somehow marginalize those using an alias, attacking the messenger and their credibility instead of discussing the message. Typical and sad.
-- Modified on 12/22/2022 5:47:31 PM
... to start a nonsense thread just to stir up shit.
... when you have no balls but think you've gathered the courage to speak out
...when you're afraid to stand behind what you've said
...when you are a chickenshit cuck
At their favorite restaurant, it logically follows they "hate" the chef, staff and food that the restaurant serves?
Pretty far-fetched theory, I must say. I think youve played the "you hate women" card too early here.
is late to an outcall appointment at a hotel, it's the fault of the customer.
First, I did not *ever* say this. In fact, I said being on time is always the responsibility of the arriving party (along with expectation that expecting party is on time too of course). So if a provider arrives late to my incall location it's obviously her fault. If I give her bad directions to enter my location, that's on customer. L
Second, I'm not sure what the culpability of either side has to do with topic on hand. Sounds like you wanted to make an ad hominem for some reason. So pathetic really.
No, you showed your true colors that you think women are inferior to you by your statement about “providers who can't take negative feedback as well as they can take dicks...”
By your logic, you’re saying that a provider’s ability to handle criticism is less than their ability to service men. Essentially you’re saying that a provider cannot have ANY feelings or emotions. Your statement reduces a woman to nothing more than a vessel for your pleasure.
There are many reasons a woman decides to do this, but they are all human beings with emotions and feelings as well.
And there are many reasons men utilize the services of providers. Some men respect these women and don’t look down on them. Some men are entitled fucks who believe the world belongs to them and women’s opinions aren’t worth a damn.
I think you’ve shown what category you fall in.
Pretty