My priorities? Whoever...

I prefer and am attracted to. "Top 10" as rated by others means diddly; I'll make my own list.

Got a "Top 1" already.

Like MZ says.  Give me 4 visits with someone I like, and it gets better and better every time.

I'll stick with my two long-time regular gals and the occasional indie or agency gal when I'm on the road.  I've only paid over $300 an hour once in all the years that I've been doing this...

...in either case, I would go with the 4 sessions with one or several long respected $300/hr perennials.  

I tried the former once, and it was very good, but frankly I have had better sessions with the long respected perennials.

Despite the rating system, there are/have been several Top 10s that, although I agree they look good in the ads, don't really get me excited to see them. Taste varies. I see very fit, photogenic women who I'm sure are real sweethearts, and I know a lot of guys are going goose-crazy over them, who I feel nothing toward. Then a woman with similar measurements, maybe a different 'do, who knows what it is? And I can't wait to set an appointment. Usually, I'm happy with the choice. I've only had a few disappointing experiences.

Ratings are overrated.

If I only had $1200, I'd probably choose to get laid 4 times instead of once, but if I'm doing this on a regular basis, I gotta go with the "Diva".  3 "Divas" a week or 12 "perennials" a week - At some point it becomes a quality over quantity argument, and my experience is that the "Diva" can charge $1200 because she offers something more than the "perennial" offers.

I've met wonderful women at both ends and at every point in between, and in nearly all cases, the $1200 experience has surpassed the $300 experience.  Was it 4x better, only on a few cases, but it was "somewhat" to "way" better in enough of the cases to make me lean in that direction more frequently.

If you are just looking to get your dick wet, then $300 is by far the more economical choice