To say that everything is perfect isn't the case - we all have our faults and issues. Mine are different, because frankly I'm pretty open about the fact that I need multiple relationships. I don't give them even the slightest fantasy of exclusivity, and so they do not feel any pressure to create a bubble around us.
The reason I can handle the talk of other women is because I am quite in touch with the reality of all this, and very comfortable with it.
There are some men who sit and compare the entire session with another lady.
Now, I've had them tell me that lady XYZ screams louder then me in bed, and that's a huge ego stroke. Great! Do I feel that I have to scream any louder in bed as a result? Not particularly, I'm not a screamer, and to do so would require concentration that would distract from my pleasure. And so, I can say that without him taking any affront because the ones who stay are the ones who are sane. Lady XXX I'm told by another gent is more aggressive - do I feel compelled to be more aggressive? No, because I'm submissive - and she is not. Obviously he's enjoying my submissive nature, otherwise he'd only see lady XXX. So do they compare? OF COURSE! Do I take affront or walk away feeling pressured? Not really.
Maybe you are confident...and perhaps these other ladies are too, however when they are trying to enjoy a lovely encounter that is about one woman and one man, sometimes it's nice to NOT talk about the other women they have been with.
I generally don't see men that are there just for play because my engagements are longer and I tend to seek long term arrangements. If they just wanted to get laid, there's no reason to book a weekend or a week together. So - the men aren't there JUST for a date with me. They are there because I can provide a great deal of lack of pressure and the ability to just be themselves, and share the secret part of their life they can share with no one else. That means the other ladies they've seen, that means private ideas about God and society and relationships that they feel would be scrutinized and cause them to be judged unfairly. Part of what I personally strive to offer as a companion is psychological freedom and unconditional understanding.
I agree that not all women are capable of offering this, and they should not be pressured to provide something they cannot - whether it is a physical act or a psychological one. However, I don't think he should be left to figure that out - professional companionship is suppose to be more direct then civ dating and thus communication should not require a guessing game. If she doesn't like or cannot handle his talking - simply telling him that it bothers her without judging him by calling him and insensitive cad, should do it. If he then persists, the truth of the matter is they are incompatible as client and companion and she should refuse further bookings, and he has to accept that if he can't change, he can't see her and has to find a more compatible companion.
I'm certain several ladies have enough confidence to not give a crap at the end of the day about a hooker/john relationship just as you (yes, just like YOU)
Not giving "a crap" about someone is not a sign of confidence, it is a sign of detachment. It is a sign that they are shutting down parts of themselves because they cannot handle the intimacy that that professional companionship requires. A healthy person is empathetic to the people they come into contact with - empathy is very much what distinguishes us from animal instinct for survival and need fulfillment. I am NOT detached from my regular and ongoing friends, I have great empathy for them. I am admittedly detached from people I've met only once or do not maintain contact between dates, I do not wish them ill, but don't loose sleep if they're gong through hard times. However, if I have seen someone for a long time, or we maintain contact between dates - I DO give a damn about him. I give a damn about him while he's in the same room and I give a damn about him when we aren't together.
I don't have image issues that require me to feel like I'm "special" or "more important" than the other women he sees, because I'm not monogamous in my personal life, so why would I need my ego tippy toes around in my professional life? All I need to know is he regards me as an equal and a friend, that he has empathy, and that's enough. I don't have to be his ATF. The fact that I am empathetic towards him, is what contributes to my ability to be happy for him when he finds joy with another woman. I'm not asking for the illusion of monogamy, I intend on providing him that illusion. They are more than Johns, they are someone's fathers, someone's friends, they are at heart good people that are just looking for some additional good vibes and good memories and fun in life. Thanks to them my life has a lot of freedom and financial stability, a great deal of my comfort and well being is thanks to them. I frankly consider them with enough dignity that I wouldn't degrade them by calling them "Johns". That suggests that they are vacuous human beings, and I feel the are whole people who have much good to offer the world and those in their lives.
This goes against discretion and so many other things, something I would hold you high to in terms of standards.
That's jumping the gun. A man saying to me "I met this really hot woman in Los Angeles that screams every time she's having an orgasm. The first time around it shocked me, but after I got used to it, it was a huge turn on."
Now where in that is a line of discretion crossed? I don't know her name, or anything about her other then she lives in LA. The vast majority of times when gents talk they are vague, they don't provide names or anything that would help connect an experience with a person. There's a lot of women in any city, how would such a conversation cross lines of discretion?
Similarly me saying: "A gentlemen I met in New York told me that the Pot Ash stocks in Western Canada are going to do particularly well thanks to asian investment."
What does that reveal about anyone? Where is the line of discretion crossed? What can he learn from that sentence? The Pot Ash industry is huge, there's endless people who read about stocks, the man may not even be in the financial industry, he might just be keeping up with the markets.
These are boundaries of COMFORT of the listener not DISCRETION. And as such it is up to both parties to acknowledge the COMFORT lines of their partner - which are not going to be the same from one person to the next. And if your line of comfort is not where the other person's is, you just have to stop seeing each other or make a concession to continue seeing the other partner.
All too often when a lady is uncomfortable with her client, she will continue to see him, because it's another pay day, then vent about how much she dislikes the person she is seeing. You can't let the money make decisions for you - if your uncomfortable say so, see only men that align to your personal boundaries - we are all entitled to have them and maintain them, but we are not entitled to judge the boundaries of others just because they're different. If you stop seeing people who make you unhappy, you won't be unhappy anymore, it's pretty simple.
-- Modified on 10/31/2010 4:18:47 PM