i've yet to have a problem with it, but have been asked by clients as to whether or not i am open to an uncircumcised man.

which has me wondering - have you ever been turned away by a provider due to being uncircumcised? or have you felt like you are treated differently because of it?

or to the ladies, what are our thoughts on seeing an uncircumcised male? does it make a difference?

~Bella

in my personal opinion, I prefer circumsized. I never turn anyone away, but there are a few issues that arise when there is a foreskin involved.

1..the obvious, hygene. Not all men attend to this properly. compounded by a hood...it can be MEGA gross..unbearably so. I have rolled bck the skin to find pasty stuff and then had to politely ask they they go to the bathroom and wash better.

2. friction, it's difficult to use my hands along with my mouth sometimes when there is all thst extra skin sliding around. I can't get the same kind of light friction

3. sensitivity..the men are usually very sensitive and react jumpily sometimes

4. wetness. there's more "sliminess" LOL

Now that's just my opinion..the #1 problem being the most important!!

. . . on my marvelously intact package.

One lady uncontrollable exclaimed "Beautiful!" as soon as she saw it. No lies.

Cut or uncut, makes absolutely no difference to me.

my preference is CLEAN. circumcised or not. unfortunately, as Natural Princess mentioned, there are a few uncut guys who are woefully inept at personal hygiene, therefore making an erotic experience with them disgusting at best.

however for the vast majority of uncircumcised men i've met, they've been nice and clean and yummy and ready to go. there are some things i enjoy with an uncut fellow that you can't have with someone who's been snipped...the extra bit of slippery-slidiness, especially...i find that delightful.

My ex-boyfriend was the first uncut guy I had ever been with and I loved it!! However, I do agree with what some of you ladies are saying- in the hobby and the civvie world, guys who are uncut do need to pay extra special attention to cleanliness or risk receiving less than adequate oral attention Personally, with cleanliness taken care of, I love uncut cocks, but I may be biased because the boyfriend I refer to was actually my first boyfriend ever and only boyfriend at that, for almost two years, so I became quite fond of him and his uncut specimen, lol.

XoXo,
Marea

Well I think that if a guy is uncircumsized, the only way a provider would turn him down is if he is unclean and has a foul ordor.  Also not being circumsized puts you at a higher risk for contracting std's due to the fact that the skin can hold bacteria if not pulled back and cleaned properly.  I dont mean to get all medicak and all but I am uncircumsized and I know that if not cleaned properly it can hold an odor...

I was circumcised (as was the custom when I was born).
But something for men to think about when the question of doing the same to thier sons.  I understand not having a foreskin leaves the penis more sensitive, and sex more enjoyable.
There is no medical reason for it, its just cosmetic.
Mhy are we mutilating males for appearence, and leaving them less able to enjoy the pleasure of sex?

some men need it...even in cultures that don't regularly do it. It is up to the doctor at birth most times, if the parents don't specify. If the skin is too tight, it will cause problems and must be snipped. I know a set of British twins, both men. One was circumsized, one was not, specifically for that reason. I'm not going to share with you how I found that infomation out...but it sure was a nice English muffin!

Uncircumcised men are 40% more sensitive than cut ones.  They are wonderful play toys, with lots of squirming potential.  I wish I saw more of them.