I have seen many reviews on pregnant providers. I guess it depends on who is reviewing the review. I think it should be allowed. Rewrite it and say she had a huge belly, and didn't look like the picture.

Try again or contact the mod back who did not approve it. Reference these threads.

Saying you did doubles with her and she brought along an underage not fully developed minor.  That would be bad.  I wonder if you're allowed to say she had a prosthetic eye and said she really enjoyed the experience and told you she'd keep an eye out for you if you chose to call again? Is that too personal?

I'm with PS. Big belly. Not like pictures.

Oh, and don't talk about massaging the baby. Way Creepy.

Much heavier than you expected and it looked like she swallowed a basketball....  I think we would get what you meant...

Or give her a 10/10. Those reviews seemingly enjoy very little oversight!

I'd think that a seriously preggers provider would something that should be known up front.  If I walked into a situation without any up front warning, I'd be pretty upset for wasting my time.

I had a review up from several years ago of a pregnant provider, but when I went to look for it, it was gone.

Anything that affects physical appearance should be fair game.  It's not like we are claiming that the person has cancer or something like that.  

Will lactating providers now be subject to being banished?

fresh turkey in the oven...  I love it!  
I'd be upset.  A provider with a large belly for what ever reason would not be able to do certain expected positions & activities.  I think it should be fair game.

I would not see a pregnant provider! And for you to hide that fact makes you responsible for what may happen.  
And what would that be you ask.. Well we know about BBFS I'm not saying the provider had BBFS with a client but she did go BB with someone. Could be a boyfriend or NOT.  So  by hiding that fact you are hiding the risks associated in seeing her. You take away my ability to make a choice, Of course you will say all reviews are not true, But if that is the case why do you then care what is in them. It is a slippery slope you walk

I guess next the fact that she advertised as Korean but is actually Croatian will be something else we can't reveal in a review.  We're making this too hard guys.

I'm laughing, oh boy, we can't tell anyone that she's sticking out a mile in the belly because it's a double-secret that she's gained 30 lbs. Since when? There are guys who seek out preggo providers so seeing this in a review would actually help her.

Come on TER, bad call here.

several options , 1. get her while u can cause in 3 more months

You'll be changing diapers if that's your fetish . 2. Instead of treat her right , if you want to bring her something she's registered at babies r us ..3. If you do an all nighter for breakfast you'll get cereal and shell provider the milk ! 4. Whole new meaning to little head as I entered her .! And 5. Sorry this is just WRONG ! UNREAL..so op did she call you grandpa ?guess poppi wasn't appropriate he was the guy before you !  

If you can't mention when a provider is pregnant what else would fall into the same category.   Plus wouldn't this policy encourage pregnant provider to withhold this information as there is no way a hobbiest could disclose the information afterward.

And I see you got the pregnant comment and the BF/pimp/driver comment in.