I just think there should be a rule that a CBJ can never get a 9 or higher. I just get tired of reading these three paragraph reviews by guys who talk about how they got the ladies off but the best they got was a cbj.

I guess I'd not give such a high rating to a CBJ...  Were they truely spectacular in other activities?  Uneven performance review ratings is certainly a reason to be suspicious.
Still VIPs are the way to go and I read the reviews of anyone I am interested in seeing.  One really needs to kow the reason for the number...  I have been surprised to see a pretty good number but with what I consider an issue in the review.  
There's no replacement for doing the homework...
skb  

-- Modified on 5/1/2008 5:19:30 AM

The words matter a lot more.  Who you think looks a 10 is my 7 is someone else's 5.  What is critical activity to you I could care less about.

Reading is your friend.

I would agree with you that I have difficulty believing that a CBJ experience would deserve a 9.  

BUT, I certainly can imagine an incredible experience where the only downside was the CBJ.  Has it ever happened to me?  No.  Will it happen? Unlikely.  But that's probably the case because BBBJ is commonly correlated with other attitudes and activities that I value.  However, there is so much subjective that goes into the experience that I wouldn't want to limit the scoring. We all have different things that make the experience special.  The only way to figure out if it's a good match is to read the full review.

The nice thing is that a CBJ is not subjective so you can include or exclude it from your search and still get a ranking based on scores if that is what is important for you.

Well thanks for sharing. I just think there should be a rule that a guy isn't allowed to post a message unless he passes an IQ test first. Looks like neither of us will get our way, so I will continue to have see your posts, and you will continue to have to sift through reviews for ladies who get the outstanding scores they earned, but also happen to care more about their health than about what effect their safety preferences may have on their reviews.

Now, I'm one of those ladies who just can't stand the taste of latex in her mouth, but I will happily defend my fellow provider's right to operate within their level of comfort.

So you say its not fair that the guy will go down on her, then she'll give him a CBJ. Hey no problem, you can always whip out a dental dam and use that to 'even the score' so to speak. And of course, remember that you have choices here. If you don't want to see a girl who gives a CBJ, then DON'T. Just keep on moving to the next review. I am sure the lady who's review you passed by will cry into her cornflakes if she knew she lost your business. Well, probably not.

Furhtermore, if a CBJ is really taht important to you, there is a much cheaper and simpler solution. Just patrol the corners in the right part of town. Those girls will forget about the cover for an extra five bucks. Then you can squeeze yours eyes shut real tight and see if you can manage to 'forget it was a service'.

Good luck to ya buddy. Now I'm gonna go submit a suggestion on the TER suggestion board to require an IQ test before messages are posted. Maybe then this will be the 43,652th time this particular bit of whining was posted, but it will also be the last time finally.

Sounds like you've got a history with this poster . . .

because there was nothing in his original message to justify such extreme insults.

The ratings system may not be perfect, but it's what we have, and it works pretty well. Just be certain that when you write YOUR reviews, you write them as honestly as possible. We all count on you when we make our decisions. If you read enough reviews, you'll see that sometimes it's the guy's preference for a CBJ, so that guy's 9 might be your 7. It's all pretty subjective, and we all have different preferences, just like the ladies do.

I did a search with the only parameters being CBJ and CIM swallows.  Seems really strange, but there were 58 providers with that combo.

is a special talent all in itself.

Film at 11:00

I can't get enough of your posts like this.  There's a fire inside that I'd dearly love to stoke when you come to Boston someday.

Classic: "I just think there should be a rule that a guy isn't allowed to post a message unless he passes an IQ test first." ROTFLMAO

Because she absolutely rocked my world and had me smiling for weeks.  Hell, that smile comes back every time I think of her or see her posts.  I prefer a bbbj, but she doesn't, and that's alright with me because I don't see these ladies for just a blowjob, I see them to experience them, and the experience with her was sublime.

(see, there's that smile again)



-- Modified on 4/30/2008 10:16:57 AM

I sprinkle itching powder in all of my posts. That is where that tingle comes from

LOL Welcome back, good to see your posts again. You got quiet there for a while. Hope all is well with you

your beauty, wit, and fire.

Dixie_Chicken has nailed it on the head!
something close to the head anyways.

Bravo

I certainly don't! The written review tells the real story of what you may expect on a date. A number is just a number and, as we can all attest, very subjective.

Sorry SOFT

really didn't mean to give offense. Does a 141 work for you?

You will be missing out on a lot of wonderful ladies.

Besides, everyone has there particular pet peeve. So yours is CBJ. What if someone else demands GFE to include DFK? Then no provider who only does LFK could not score above 8 either? Or someone else who gets pissed to read in a review that a provider won't do anal. Should they also not be allowed to get a 9 or 10? Etc. Etc.

I was just venting, but in the end "De gustibus non est disputandum"

I agree.  Not every single act has to be in every session.