I definitely prefer a free-flowing session. Even during a rare "role-play", I am only interested essentially in the "costume" (maid, schoolgirl, etc.) and not in creating a scene to follow. And to be sure, I would love to see you in either (or nothing ).

To me, one the gfe requirements (see thread below) is we start with LFK and see where it goes naturally. Love it...

K

I prefer what appears to be a free-flowing session that is in fact scripted -- by me!

Actually, if doing roleplay, it's most fun for me if the general set-up is agreed to in advance, and then we improvise on that.

As for myself...

... one could argue that any session with a provider IS roleplay I suppose.  Regardless, what I seek with a lady is at least the illusion of a passionate encounter that freely flows and includes her pleasure as much or even more than mine.  
Interestingly the role-plays I've had with Civvie friends has mainly been them pretending to be providers!  Amazing how that turns women on sometimes!
I've only had one role-play with a provider and it was all her idea and unexpected.  By the time she started calling me 'Daddy' etc, I had figured out that she was actually a flake and borderline psycho (no she was NOT Nicole Kidman's Hollywood body double and the Governor didn't really call her for advice regularly - the scary thing was that she BELIEVED all that).  Anyway, the path of least resistance was to just go with it and I did.  The only good news is that she forgot about the clock altogether and was very enthusiastic about getting MSOG (all 3 of them).  Regardless, she was history immediately after.  
MVR

Not into role play

I prefer a free flowing session, just so long as it is NOT aunt flow.


Ho Ho Ho
Jingle my Bells
XLIII = 4

scripted, it has a good possibility of becoming mechanical. Plus, if you know what's coming, it takes a lot of the fun out of it.

The last thing I want is any sort of role playing. A lot of guys like to refer to the fantasy element of the hobby but I really don't get that at all.  I'm paying a beautiful woman for her time...and for hot sex. There is no fantasy involved. Hopefully she is able to let go and enjoy the time we spend together.  If I sense that it is all just an act I am not going to be re-booking.

Free flow for me...

I recently saw a lady who apparantly had a script she followed & while we had some fun it wasn't as good as the ladies who just let things happen.

I frequently have requests for elaborate setups with scripts land in my inbox.

Just as I decline clients who wish for me to give them a footjob or spend an hour sucking my toes, tickling me or zipping me up in a body bag with a hole for my mouth only (don't laugh-I have received this request twice in two different markets/regions) I refuse these appointments.

There are some providers who are consistently artistic and able in terms of bringing every client's fantasy into a real life dream-cum-true; their bedrooms are veritable amusement parks and they're regarded accordingly (I can think of two in New York whose reviews I've noticed and they simply astonish me in the sheer range of their ability).

Then there are some providers who simply sell themselves; time with them is intended to be as close an approximation of time spent with a girlfriend or a woman you've just met for casual sex as possible.

I fall into the latter and admittedly, chemistry accounts for whether or not this can actually occur.  Those of us who are concerned with "being good" can mimic our behavior, effectively "role-playing" with people who we don't necessarily like and do not enjoy entertaining but I am very sure that it is recognized and results in YMMV (but not deemed a "bad performance" by those who understand the necessity of chemistry for a true girlfriend experience).

In short:  No UPS man/ lonely young housewife scenario for me, but even if I don't like you I can attempt to "role-play" my general tendencies with others I who I do.

-- Modified on 12/4/2008 11:02:29 AM

I am not a very frequent hobbyist--maybe 6-8 times a year.  When I set the time aside (and can get away) to enjoy a session with a provider, I look forward to something as close to "date-like" as I can get.  I prefer GFE--getting to know the lady, letting the session progress as it may.  I know that this is, for the most part, a fantasy playing itself out, but I have never really wanted to add a second layer of roleplay to it.  Just my personal preference...

Never really tried a full-on roleplay, but perhaps a bit of both, with mostly improve, which would mean free-flowing.  I think the dressing up will be the extent of the role-playing part, perhaps with a bit of dialog to fit the clothing.

was the same MO as the first two.  This was in my earlier years in this great hobby of ours.

so what might be great for one is a big turn off for another..

I believe in letting nature take it's course but one thing you can always count on with me is the first kiss, and the next and oh yes another kiss ...It's not scripted and very free flowing

Do what makes you feel comfortable, let yourself lead and then let the other take the reins..It's a great mix and always works for me

Kisses Haley

-- Modified on 12/4/2008 9:06:05 PM

Free flowing.  Scripted roleplay is just too contrived for my tastes.

Most of my sessions are free flowing.

I have had requests for roleplay but it is not scripted per say, just ad-lip. I had one guy explain that if he wanted normal sex, he could get it with his gf. With me, he wanted costumes and fantasies, and that's fine.

What I do pride myself in is influencing sessions so no single one session is the same. It could be a change as slight as my makeup, shoes, lingerie, sex position, venue of sex (bed, table, chair etc) or order of flow. It's always different.

I like brainstorming with a (repeat)gentleman what he would be game for the next time we meet. I like stretching their sexual comfort level and knowledge, by introducing new techniques and tools. If he can't do it with me comfortably and feel he is in a safe space, who could he do it with?