Wow, you really take this seriously.
I was just pointing out the truth, dont let it bother you so much, makes you look like a whiny bitch.Friends
How is it ok for a provider to come onto TER, advertise her tours here on TER regional boards, flame a detractor, voice various viewpoints on the boards, and generally self-promote while at the same time having a strict “no review policy”?? Is that ok? I (obviously) would not think so. This is, after all, The Erotic REVIEW is it not?!? I do not wish to name names but it just seems hypocritical, opportunistic, unfair, and wrong. She seems legit enough with a long tenure of posting here, a very professional and credible personal website, and credible-appearing ads up on Tryst, Slixa, etc. BUT she charges high rates and requires deposits for bookings. Ugh. I’ve been hobbying awhile and never saw this pattern before. My sense: you got no reviews, you get no deposits. To me this would be like going on P411 and trying to book a provider there only to have her pm you back saying she does not accept verification through P411.
Yeah, no.
Watcha think? Is her M.O. ok by you? Justifiable? Or not?
Opinions please….
That's her profile. Take it for what it's worth. Obvi, you shouldn't see this nameless, horrible harridan. And probably shouldn't pay attention to her posts, either.
I am just being honest with my own personal experiences with p411 & they do not verify if a person has a criminal background. No checks for our safety it’s our job to do our own vetting. P411 is very clear on us doing our own safety checks. P411 verifies your a human.
I agree to disagree with that statement, but do understand your concerns with using TER to advertise.
Maybe if they don’t want reviews here they should not use this platform.
-- Modified on 12/30/2025 8:14:44 AM
QueenBia
Not exactly sure what your point is. P411 certainly is a verification site, just as TER is a review site. That was the analogy I was making. Neither P411 nor TER are primarily advertisement sites, though both permit advertising secondarily as a perk to their members. It is assumed that if a provider uses P411 as such, that verification there (through it) is acceptable. My major point in my original post is that being an active, vocal member of TER should implicitly mean that providers who join it will be willing to accept review postings about them.
I agree to disagree with that statement, but do understand your concerns with using TER to advertise.
Maybe if they don’t want reviews here they should not use this platform.
How is it a verification site exactly? They don't verify anything really.
I've encountered a few providers on P411 that did not accept membership alone for screening. P411 itself even advises women to do whatever screening they feel is necessary to feel safe.
No Problemo...!
By the way---What happens if someone actually violates her request and submits a review? Do they come to her in advance for approval?
By the way---What happens if someone actually violates her request and submits a review? Do they come to her in advance for approval?
There are more pressing issues here and in the real world to get excited about. Much like the whole "deposits" controversy, if you have a problem with how someone conducts themselves, move on to the next in line.
Why are Americans so bloody cowardly?
Go on then, name a name.
Americans? Bud if you are posting from anywhere in EU your man card just got got.
Luke
Wise, not cowardly, thank you very much. I do not appreciate your gratuitous insult, which adds nothing to my post. I’m guessing you’re a Brit based on your arrogance and your use of the word “bloody”. Anyway, fly boy, if you saw how many megabytes of space on the internet this person at issue wielded in flaming her one detractor (whose deposit she kept after a cancellation), you’d understand. See, years ago, when people read newspapers made of actual paper, Greener’s Law was coined: “never argue with someone who buys ink by the barrel.” I.e. don’t pick fights with the media. Sage advice. A modern corollary is that its very unwise to pick fights with people who carry out internet armageddon. In my extensive searches for any reviews of her, what turned up instead was infinite internet excoriation of one particular detracto, across multiple social media platforms. I would rather not be her second target. That is all. And that is wisdom, not cowardice.
Its kind of being a puss to be honest. Unless you were actually negligent enough to give your real info...
1. If you dont name the gal, you are just wasting your time. And ours.
2. No review policy doesnt mean shit. Id submit a review regardless, especially if she is no bueno.
Being a puss and not naming names while hiding behind an alias isnt going to get anything accomplished, besides comijg off like a whiney bitch.
Hey rockingchair
You should think before you post. To your first point, you’re incorrect. The issue (as a general principle) can absolutely be discussed without the specific example. To your second point, you are just flat out wrong. Providers can enforce their “no-review” policy via complicit moderators who will block and delete etc. And regarding me being a puss, read my response to flyboyLuke.
Now go back to your rocking chair, and try to think before you flame.
This is the first time I've heard this. How do you know such mods exist? While I suppose it could be true it really doesn't make sense in terms of TER's mission, which is to provide as many legit reviews as possible.
watch out, he'll assault your dog
Could you be any more pre-dick-table?
1. Im totally correct. You are coming off like a whiner.
2. Youre high as hell if you think mods are complicit with a provider. A provider can list herself as unreviewable, sure. But thats as far as it goes.
So not only are you a whiner but you must be a noob as well.
Ok ReadytoRim1
You want to dance?
Now pay attention:
I came here with a reasonable point to make, looking for debate or various points of view etc., and to make a reasonable suggestion. You and flyboyLuke just hurl insults, the way a caged primate in the zoo hurls its shit. You’re like the fucking playground bully in kindergarten, aren’t you? I bet you were that kindergarten brat, and you were probably the biggest kid in your class because you were held back. I bet you bullied the smarter but physically weaker kids and also even the girls, just because you could. Its really a damn shame your mother didn’t swallow. But at least she’s content now doing what she does best……on her knees gettied bukakkied in Hell all day every day.
That is how you hurl insults dickhead.
Have a nice day.
1. Im totally correct. You are coming off like a whiner.
2. Youre high as hell if you think mods are complicit with a provider. A provider can list herself as unreviewable, sure. But thats as far as it goes.
So not only are you a whiner but you must be a noob as well.
Wow, you really take this seriously.
I was just pointing out the truth, dont let it bother you so much, makes you look like a whiny bitch.
“Whiny bitch, whiny bitch, whiny bitch”. That the best you can do for an insult, dickbreath?? You keep saying it. Got no backup insults? No repertoire of nastiness tucked away in your insect brain? Just “whiny bitch” and that’s it?
Well, Mr. ReadytoReceiveRectal1, allow me to respond in a way maybe you can understand….
Whiny bitch? Am NOT. AM NOT a whiny bitch; YOU’re a whiny bitch. Nanna nanna boo boo. So there poopyface!
Ha! Did that manage to penetrate your stunted intellectual barbed wire perimeter?
Happy New Year douchebag.
You have got to be the most thin skinned person to ever post here! If you’re not a puss, name names!
Hes totally a puss. And you are right, thin skinned.
Ok ReadytoRoofie1
People here seem to like my counterbarbs, so here we go for another round….and remember, you started it, dickhead…,
- You use a lot of drug lingo and you talk about getting high etc., but we all know you don’t actually partake in using illicit drugs. Only your unsuspecting victims do.
- You like to brag that you used to be a Jehovah’s Witness, which makes sense because every time you go now to a glory hole, nobody answers.
- Here’s a math problem for you: if your technique is to put three roofies into one drink, how do you come out with only two months’ probation?
- You love to brag that you’re in an open relationship. And by that you mean that all the cases against you haven’t been closed yet.
- You claim you are bisexual, by which you mean you have to buy sex or you get no sex.
- Women have described you as short, unattractive, unhygenic, armed, dangerous and last seen on foot escaping through their window.
- I have no doubt but that you are going to be very pissed at me for posting these highly revealing jokes about you…..just as soon as you can find somebody to explain them to you.
Now THAT is how you insult someone, motherfucker.
Oh, and yeah, have a nice day.
Its funny you took the time to type any of that.
You claim "others" like this type of behaviour. I kinda doubt that. Its not even worth reading.
Me thinks you are the type of fella that believes the stripper really likes them. Quite a few of ya on here ive noticed over the years.
Hey ReadytoRepulse1
The only way I knew people here on these forums enjoyed the way I slammed you was that they posted it and “liked” my jams. So you can see that for yourself, moron. To do that, though, you’d have to take a short break from your chaser activity. Seems that you are pretty much of a full time TSchaser. So go now, get back to it. I’m sure there must be two or three chicks with dicks out there that you haven’t sucked off and rimmed yet, so, by all means, get back to yo’ chasin’ them TS hoes.
Buh bye biiiiitch
I think you liked those posts yourself. You take this so seriously i wouldnt doubt that you have a 2nd or 3rd account.
Im not a full time chaser. I still take the time to break off your moms now and then.
Oh wow. Looks like more people liked my post calling you a whiney bitch than any of your posts with your odd behaviour of grade school jokes and weak rebuttals.
So whos fooling who?
...and they frequently post both on the discussion boards and advertise. Here is where the back channel is your friend if you're truly interested in seeing her. If her actions, attitudes or financial requirements are what has your undies in a bunch, well, you're just going to have to get over that.
Snafu
Excellent points, my friend. Well said! You get it.
Carry on.
One, while many make the claim that TER is a review site as if it should only be related to reviews it's certainly been much more than that. Why would it even have a provider only board if it's was truly just about reviews -- or any of the discussion boards for that matter.
TER respecting the no review policy and not having some related policy about no participation by providers that have no review policies is a simply fact -- just like non VIP accounts get to post and read limited parts of a review and profile without having ever written a review. Not really a big deal.
If she wants to use TER within the stated guidelines I don't really see and issue. She is still showing who she is and in some ways isn't that the best review you can hope to find?
Jensen
You make fair points. Thank you for your thoughts and thank you for not just hurling insults like some others here. To be clear, I never stated that TER is exclusively a review board; my point is that it is primarily a review board. Reviews are at TER’s core and always have been its essence. Escort Reviews (and the need for them) are what gave rise to TER. All the other TER features like these discussion boards are add-on amenities/bonuses. I am not exactly sure how TER moderators enforce ‘no review’ policies; but my sense is that they do and I don’t think that they should for providers who take advantage of relatively lax advertising policies and self-promotion opportunities here. One way they could do that is to simply require that for a provider to post her ad on a regional board she must include a link to her reviews within that ad. Wouldn’t that make sense and seem fair? Literally tit for tat.
True you don't say it's only a review system and agree reviews are a primary feature of the site that people value. I just don't see that as a reason to think a policy change is needed -- though clearly it's a suggested change you could promote (perhaps coupling with a post to the S&P board and requests for likes to signal user support to the admins) in the GD board for discussion and visibility.
I'm not exactly sure just how much business posting to the Buzz Boards actually produce for any provider compared to the many alternative advertising venues.
Been a long time so I might be recalling incorrectly but I think for providers to use TER for advertising purposes they have to put the TER gif and link to TER on their site. I think in most cases that is connected with the "see my reviews" but I'm not sure it's required to have reviews to have the TER tag. That is advertising for TER which I assume you would support -- more that know about TER the more reviews for more providers might be submitted. Plus, in the situation you raise -- girl uses TER but has a no review policy so has no TER reviews -- this is useful information about the provider that is not filtered through someone else and necessarily unverifiable in terms of facts (read a review and you're acting on claims, not facts you can prove before your own session. You can make some educated guesses about the validity of the review and I suspect most do so rather than just take review at face value). When we have the opportunity to see what the provider does (be it no review policy but using TER, going BSC because she disagrees with some customer or a review...) is all good, firsthand information that each of us can directly observe. That is clearly as useful as a review for certain aspects of a decision to see or pass. So I would say excluding those providers from TER that have no review policies reduces the information, and in a very real sense the quality of that information, those using TER to make decisions.
I think those the see TER primarily through the lens of reviews under appreciate this aspect. You may well disagree and have your reasons/logic for that an that's fine.
The best review one can hope to find is nothing less than a blow by blow, fully detailed review.
Without one, they dont even exist to me. If you guys like tossing your dough into the unknown, cool. Yall do you.
RTR1
Much as I hate to say it, we agree. There is tremendous value to TER reviews. They are extremely helpful in our “screening” process of escorts. So many flakes and scammers out there pretending to be providers. I use TER reviews as my gold standard info source when considering booking some provider I have never before seen. If there are 5-10 reviews that are generally consistent, that tells you a ton. That is “go to” info.
See, the whole reason I started this thread was I saw an ad for a hot looking escort on Tryst, and considered booking her, etc. But first I came here to read her reviews, and found zero reviews but found a boatload of her ads and her trashing of one guy (she aggressively flamed him using just his handle, thereby potentially defaming that handle). Then I went outside TER to other sites, and again, no reviews, but lots of ads and lots of trashtalk. Obviously I did not reach out to her. But it struck me that she is abusing TER. Maybe she is following the letter of TER’s guidelines but she sure as shit is not abiding by the spirit of this site, which is fundamentally about escort reviews. As I stated, I wanted to come here, raise the question as a general question while avoiding naming or outing someone who might just turn around and unleash unholy Hell on my handle. That is all.
Yeah i wouldnt spend so much whining about this shit and just go see a well reviewed gal.
RTR1
Much as I hate to say it, we agree. There is tremendous value to TER reviews. They are extremely helpful in our “screening” process of escorts. So many flakes and scammers out there pretending to be providers. I use TER reviews as my gold standard info source when considering booking some provider I have never before seen. If there are 5-10 reviews that are generally consistent, that tells you a ton. That is “go to” info.
See, the whole reason I started this thread was I saw an ad for a hot looking escort on Tryst, and considered booking her, etc. But first I came here to read her reviews, and found zero reviews but found a boatload of her ads and her trashing of one guy (she aggressively flamed him using just his handle, thereby potentially defaming that handle). Then I went outside TER to other sites, and again, no reviews, but lots of ads and lots of trashtalk. Obviously I did not reach out to her. But it struck me that she is abusing TER. Maybe she is following the letter of TER’s guidelines but she sure as shit is not abiding by the spirit of this site, which is fundamentally about escort reviews. As I stated, I wanted to come here, raise the question as a general question while avoiding naming or outing someone who might just turn around and unleash unholy Hell on my handle. That is all.
...are getting way out of hand. There's clearly some dudes in here getting off on either their fantasy telling of what they thought occurred or thinking we need to see how great they are in bed but I'd prefer they covered the details in a couple quick paragraph. No Penthouse forum needed, we can watch it for free on any search engine.
Ill take this into consideration but im making 0 promises
Don't change on my account. Seeing one of your reviews is more than enough for me, can't stand seeing the hint of that on TV and I'm certainly not going to read about it.
It really musr be an interesting experience.
Being closed minded and from a small town. Hanging out on this forum as a main source of entertainment, arguing for years with folks on things you think you are correct about, but really arent.
Hope its working out well for ya.
My viewpoints are based on many things and living in both the urban and rural environments hasn't created any desire to suck cock, rim trannies or have sex with house pets. I'm comfortably remaining in my "bubble" I guess.
Its your story, you tell if how you like brother.
Wow you liked your own post.
Thats fucking bold.
As it reads today, two others did like it but if you want I can hit the like button so it looks like 3.
You and your 2nd account probably.
You like to OCD argue so much with all your free time, i wouldnt doubt if you have multiple accounts.
Nope, just one account.
Sure pal.
Looks like a few others agree with me
He’ll want the last word , you’ll want the last word and on and on these threads will go.
Why don’t both of you get room and duke it out .., last man out wins
My gawd… boys will be … boys
It will end with other dude going full OCD because he takes this very seriously.
I just make my comments about the obvious, dont mind me.
Be a rule? Who is your gripe with? Management or the nameless provider?
I didn't even think this is possible.
If this is true, it's a sick joke. At the very least they should have the fact that they are delisted appear right next to their username.
I do not think delisted providers can post and supposedly are not be mentioned here.
To delist all adds needed to betaken taken down or that use to be the case.
It also used to be that any provider who posted an add could be reviewed-not being covered by something phrase or verbal comment to client that she as a no review policy.
Have no idea why it should be any different with a provider when she posts an add that she can say I do not want reviews - what if Perkins said we do not want reviews ?
The mentioning of delisted providers definitely has not been in force forthe last few years.
The question should be: Is her M.O. ok by TER?
The reason a provider comes onto TER, advertises her tours here on TER regional boards, flames a detractor, voices various viewpoints on the boards, and generally self-promotes while at the same time having a strict “no review policy” is because no one has reported her.
If it bothers you, why are you protecting her identity? If it bothers you, report her post. Let TER decide. If she has a profile and reviews, TER will delist her, especially since she's advertising here. If she doesn't have a profile, TER may ban her from posting.
Well, people can opine all they want, or they can just read the policies, linked below for posting ads on the Buzz boards. But yes, anyone offended by such actions can report the use to the admins and they might remove the posts though probably only those that are argumentative or abusive to reviewers. Kind of guessing on that.
PERSONAL SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR BUZZ POSTING:
When linking to your own site in your buzz posts, your site must have either the REVIEWED AT TER emblem / link or a TER banner. This is also required for your link to ISO if using your personal website.
The emblem or banner MUST link back to TER when clicked on.
Perhaps I'm wrong here but I think those refer to two different objects given the "either" so no need to have reviews, or I suspect allow them since that doesn't seem to be a requirement to post.
But is it really that big a deal? TER gets some free advertising and the provider herself will demonstrate her character directly for all to see. Everyone can make their own mind up and given a lot of replies one might think such providers are loosing more business than they are gaining.
36363jensen
While I appreciate your thoughtful points, the policies you reference are definitely not enforced. I’ve now looked at several providers who clearly violate the exact rules you cite. They promote themselves on the buzzboards, but their advertisements only link back to their personal websites or to other non-TER advertising sites. So much for rules. Kinda like the rules for this board which stipulate courtesy, decency, and decorum; and which specifically prohibit namecalling. Obviously, again, not enforced.
No sooner did I raise a perfectly legitimate issue for discussion, in a constructive manner, than I was called “cowardly”, “whiney”, a “puss”, a “bitch”, and ordered repeatedly to name names. Fuck this board. Y’all don’t abide by any rules, and y’all are rude as fuck. Sorry I raised the issue.
Bye bye.
Yes, the mannered discussion that we're supposed to engage in per posting policy is frequently stressed. But in part that stems from so many in the group wanting that type of interaction -- many are happy to talk trash and trade insults. Exactly where for TER to draw the line is difficult (but agree that the current management is a lot more lax about the officially stated rules and have not really gone back to rewrite anything much). But some have been banned or placed on probation for exactly what you are pointing at -- so rather than no enforced I think you have a differing view on how to apply the rule and what is or is not a violation. Not a simple bit even for lawyers who make a living out of writing documents to remove all wiggle room and differences in interpretation.
But I took your main complaint to be that the poster in violation was specifically unwelcome as that person had a no review policy. But that is not relevant to ability to post, run ads or interact with other users here. Should it be as many seem to think? IDK.
Edit -- since I left the original subject but rewrote the post. If you want to take the position that the provider with the no review policy that is misbehaving (we used to call them BSC, make fun of them and move on) then I don't think you really fix anything by talking in the abstract/generalities and do need to name names -- if nothing else that is letting others know who the person is and they can then take whatever actions they think appropriate. Since it's clearly public info if you're worried about repercussions you could always just make a new account (not sure that is kosher or not but should be better than an alias) then make the post, have the discussion and promptly forget all about the account if you want.
-- Modified on 1/7/2026 8:05:47 AM
So if someone is advertising here but not allowing reviews here, that's on admin for not moderating that person's use of the site.
I'm open to being corrected on the TOS.
Just gonna bump this in the unlikely event that someone, anyone, appreciates a little bit of context mixed with fact.
So who is this mysterious rule breaker?