Here’s a pet peeve on reviews: I hate it when reviewers cannot be at least somewhat accurate in checking off physical attributes. This happens a lot with breast cup size (Cs and small Ds often being rated as DD or larger) and with body type (there’s a hell of a lot of baby fat and more out there being rated as normal or even athletic). This goes also to hair length. I mean, what kind of Doofus can’t figure out that “super-long” means longer than “ass-length”, or for that matter, that “ass-length” means down to the friggin’ ass, for Pete’s sake? This may seem like a picky complaint, but it really makes searches inaccurate and inconsistent. Is there not something TER moderators can do, like make a an objective assessment when possible?
Also, it seems like the physical attributes described by a providers first rating seem to carry on even after being rated multiple times. After the first rater rates a provider with DD-cups or ass-length hair, if the next five raters describe her as C-cup and shoulder length hair and the pictures reflect it, can’t an administrative adjustment be made?
And another thing that really screws up searches is price. If some first rater pays $1k for four hours and lists this as the price, the price should be adjusted to at least an hourly rate. If you do your searches plugging in a maximum of $4 or 5 hundred, this provider will never pop onto your radar.
Sorry. Just bitching.
Go to the profile page. Above the details, there is a link for "Report a Problem". Click that and report the problem clearly with as much detail as possible. Some are easy to fix quickly (broken web link; provide new working link). Others might require verification.
I've corrected some physical data by spelling things out clearly for the TER crew. E.g., I QUOTE from specific reviews so they can find the info quickly and easily. Sometimes, I've referred to board discussions: "She announced her new website on the NYC board last month [link to TER post]."
It might be harder to ask them to normalize a quoted rate to an hourly rate. Some providers use a price structure to encourage longer dates, not a simple multiplier. Hourly rates would make searching more reliable, but it's not like a quoted multi-hour rate is incorrect, it's more like missing info.
Good luck on your quest.
Unless you do that, you at least have to keep in mind that the details come from the original reviewer and, unless there's a problem report submitted, they just stay there. This is despite the fact that subsequent reviewers are REQUIRED to fill out the same details. Since you're using an alias it's hard to know if you yourself review. The fact that you don't know this makes me think you don't.
I review a lot. I try to be fair and accurate, particularly in physical descriptions. IMHO, these are very important in the decision process for many if not most hobbyists. Also, I do try to encourage the moderators to make changes when I find obvious errors. The stupid thing is, why doesn't it happen automatically if 10 subsequent viewers make a consistently more accurate description than the first one (or provide an hourly rate instead of a 4 hour rate)
Yet again, I rant on.
I agree that people may have a tendancy to copy/paste demographics into the review form. Let's face it, I'm not sitting there measuring everything during my session! I am sure no one is and most just go with their best guess.
I also agree that when writing a review, try to post the hourly rate if you can, not necessarily what you paid for 4 or 15 hours...that's great and all, but who else is going to need that data from a TER review???? Presumably you will see her a few times before booking a long session and then you can bloody well just ask her.
I agree it's stupid to have to fill out the details if they don't even use it to make changes. Perhaps that would be too time-consuming. Consider how long it takes to get a review processed now! I've got two awaiting their thumbs-up now!
One of the reviews I had pending just went up. It took about 3 days, which is not bad.
Maybe her boob shrank when she got her hair cut?
If the physical description in her TER review looks to be reasonably close to what I'm looking at, I'll just repeat it; I'm not going to waste time with a measuring tape. Of course any noticeable change to hair length/color/style will be noted and reported.
I am only 5'4" and the first person who reviewed me listed me as between 5'6" and 5'8" (not his fault, I look taller in heels). But now it says I'm between 5'3" and 5'5", which is correct. I agree with you though-and I think it's funny that they have both "thin" and "skinny" as body type descriptions-they mean the same thing to me LOL.
I made appointments with a well known TER provider TWICE and was canceled each time at the last minute after going through the review process. Had other reviews indicated this I would have never made the effort. I am far too busy to waste my time making futile appointments.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
