In the reviews, we rate providers on appearance and performance with a scale of 1 to 10. I would like to ask a question concerning the appearance rating. Do you find it, at least sometimes, that the rating number given by hobbyists does not match with how attractive or unattractive the provider is? For example, recently I saw a profile of a provider with many "10s" given by the hobbyists. The provider is anorexic, flat chested, flat behind with skinny boney legs and has an average looking face and yet, she is given a "10". The reverse is also true. I would see a provider who has a pretty face, an incredible body with gorgeous tits, perfect round ass, beautiful legs, incredible curves all in the right places and yet, she is given at most a "7". Some may say that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder but isn't this rather extreme?
For the guys as well as the gals.
Simply because each person has his and her version of hot or attractive. I do agree that there is just some visually impaired people around that can make things tough BUT there are also those who, if had the chance to fuck a super model, would be so fricken picky as to score her low in appearance. This is a no win situation
So, while beauty is in the eyes of the beholder within an average of say 1 or 2, maybe at most 3 deviation in appearance points, it seems to me it can be quantified objectively outside of that average range.
Usually when I find a girl really hot, her profiles reflect this accurately. If her scores are averaging less than what I expect, it tells me she's using very old or very heavily photo shopped pictures.
If her scores are too high, she's either good at manipulating her clients to hit the number or skip writing a review, or she really is the real deal. I usually check to see if the reviewers have the same taste in women as me. If there is a general agreement, then I know the score can be trusted
Why should your issue be my issue?
Simply because each person has his and her version of hot or attractive. I do agree that there is just some visually impaired people around that can make things tough BUT there are also those who, if had the chance to fuck a super model, would be so fricken picky as to score her low in appearance. This is a no win situation.
Do you think our issues are fair?
What if playboy issues don't sell?
Remember, June 2014 playboy issues existed before June 2000 issues.
Do you and her suffer the same issue?
What if playboy issues don't sell?
Remember, June 2014 playboy issues existed before June 2000 issues.
I think that honestly some guys are just so floored to actually be with a woman who will give them the time of day that they are instantly enamored and see her all in pretty golden and pink light - so she gets high appearance scores.
but the other factor is taste - it may well be that what you consider to be the "perfect round ass" and "incredible curve" would to me look like an overfed lard ass
while what you consider to be "bony" would to me be perfect -
I have a hunch that your perfect woman is 5'6 and maybe 140lbs where mine is 5'8 and 110....
you really do have to account for taste - and when it comes to appearance, go by pictures.... but of course even those can be deceiving....
True enough. I reviewed a provider I saw recently who wasn't my type. I could see, though, that she was the type that most other guys would find attractive. I gave her a 9 on looks, as I think most guys would see her as that. Too high? Dunno. Included in that 9 was her body, which was just as hot as advertised.
Exactly, 5'4"-5'6 at 115 to 125 lbs with C cups and a round ass, not flat. Oh and she should have good teeth, hygiene and clear skin without a lot of blemishes. Ideally between 21 and 30 years old and toned but not overly muscled. Of course thats MY idea of a 9. A 10 is a once in a lifetime impossible dream and so will never be found, or at least only once. Now for you older gals, a 9 is achievable by looking younger or at least in my eyes, sluttier, lol.
To put this in perspective, I'm a slightly overweight middle aged white guy under 6' with sun damaged skin, a mustache and goatee speckled with grey and would probably rate myself as a 6 on a scale for guys. So who the F--k cares how I rate anybody? I usually put a caveat in the review explaining how I feel about the provider's appearance beyond the number and why.
There is nothing womanly or feminine about 5'8 110lbs.
but the other factor is taste - it may well be that what you consider to be the "perfect round ass" and "incredible curve" would to me look like an overfed lard ass
while what you consider to be "bony" would to me be perfect -
I have a hunch that your perfect woman is 5'6 and maybe 140lbs where mine is 5'8 and 110....
you really do have to account for taste - and when it comes to appearance, go by pictures.... but of course even those can be deceiving....
But others who like that look would disagree. See, this is where that score is weird and why so many guys complain.
We have had ladies mentioning celebrity guys they find hot. Johnny Depp keeps coming up and I find him weak looking, almost dirty. My type is "The Rock". See the difference?
There's nothing wrong with liking that look. However I'm correct in my assertion, that there is nothing womanly about 5'8 110lbs.
Woman http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/woman
1. an adult female human being
... if she looks like a boy (visualize 5'8 110lbs for a moment) she can't look like an adult woman too
-- Modified on 5/29/2014 6:33:26 AM
@ 5'8 110 lbs.
http://healthyceleb.com/jessica-biel-height-weight-body-statistics/1809
They claim she is 121 lbs @ 5'8, if she lost eleven pounds she wouldn't have any womanly charms left.
Perfect Storm, it's all mathematical statistics
I just found some stock photo to throw on my post. I also don't know what these women actually weigh at any given time, plus women always lie about their weight. Also, obviously can't believe everything on the internet. However, all that said, I have found information that claims the following:
Kate Beckingsale: 5'-8" 115 pounds.
Gabrielle Union: 5'-8" 110 pounds.
Adriana Lima: 5'-10" 112 pounds.
Jessica Biel: 5'-8" 108 pounds
Can I prove any of these statistics? No. But can you prove otherwise?
-- Modified on 5/29/2014 7:37:53 AM
I'm not a very good judge of weight, I'm like 5'7 150 lbs no tits, no ass, (big dick) and thin.
Using myself as a comparison, those numbers just don't sound right.
I personally think that 110 is way too thin to be hot for 5'8"...
-- Modified on 5/29/2014 6:33:26 AM
I have to confess that even for someone who loves the "hard bodies" like I do, 5' 8" and 110 lbs is a bit lean, even for me. 5' 8" and 115-120 lbs, now we're talking. lol
T&A ...
She is 5' 7" and her weight will fluctuate from about 115-130 lbs. While I prefer her at the lower weights, she hates the fact that she loses her tits at little over 120, and her ass at 115.
personally, I don't mind her full C's or even small D's being reduced to a B cup when I get that hard flat stomach in their place.
that's perfect in my book - but I am at least to a degree, flexible.... I do however decry the current trend in k-girls toward bigger fake boobs.... and I deplore a flabby ass and saggy breasts....
But since we get what we get, the money makes up for the sag factor. IRL, I am like you, tight ass, Great chiseled chest and softball sized shoulders and a mid section y+ou can hide a nickel in. I have one reg like that I only see about 5 times a year but it is fucking amazing to run my hands over that fine body.
if you don't like what you see.
I'm with you, fake D's or even worse DD's on a petite 5'3" 105 lb frame is just not sexy to me. Well at least not as sexy as a more proportionate full B or C cup on the same small frame.
I agree even more about a woman being flabby or saggy ANYWHERE. I am 55 and also the one doing the paying, and I work my ass off so as not to be a big tub of lard. I expect at least the same from the women I pay
yeah to me B to C is great - and I'm all about shape and texture - the k-girls were getting some amazing boob jobs done Asian style with the scar at the bikini line and the implants put in through the interstitial spaces - gorgeous shape and texture on those - Hae Soo had the nicest set I've ever seen..... too many of them have succumbed to the idea that bigger is better and are carrying breasts that are bordering on the ridiculous for their slender petite frames....
I call them "tres cabezas" as their boobs are the same size as their heads. lol
Another trend I am not wild about are the butt implants that many of the chicas are going for. They all seem to want those Brazilian "culos" and some of them are so overdone that they look downright freakish.
-- Modified on 5/29/2014 10:01:57 AM
Hahaha my sister says the exact same thing whenever I swoon over Johnny. She always says "eww he looks like he'd smell bad." By that same token, she likes guys like Brad Pitt and Channing Tatum, while I find them to be perfect examples of the male "plain Jane." Gimme Johnny Depp, M. Shadows or Adam Levine any day.
We have had ladies mentioning celebrity guys they find hot. Johnny Depp keeps coming up and I find him weak looking, almost dirty. My type is "The Rock". See the difference?
We have had ladies mentioning celebrity guys they find hot. Johnny Depp keeps coming up and I find him weak looking, almost dirty. My type is "The Rock". See the difference?
that's an awful shallow thing to complement someone on, an outward elective visual enhancement.
... it's the equivalent to saying she's hot. Love her breast implants.
We are nowhere close so we can hang here and have some fun. I love your style and you're very easy on the eyes to boot.
-- Modified on 5/29/2014 5:49:38 PM
And Johnny Depp for that matter. But with JD, it's more than what he looks like. Seeing him in so many films you kinda get an idea of what he's like, and that's pretty sexy.
And add David Draiman to my list. Yum.
but I am accustomed to and prefer women who are more the fashion model type - 5'9 or more at size 0/2 - though I make allowances for shorter women in the same general shape
you might like lardassed women and find that "womanly" - that's your privilege :p
I will take thin and toned anyday....
is nice. What you described sounded sickly.
I'm certain it is "my issue" but I don't like women taller than me.
Pimples can't deal with women taller than him. They scare him limp I guess.
who were NYC agency types - 5'10 - 5'11 - plus wearing heels - and I'm still taller :p
eternal douchiness like Pimples. He seems like the type that would complain about anything, with a dour, sour expression like he had just licked poop.
though when I'm rimming I like it clean lol
it's not actually dating when they are on the clock.
... and it's seven thirty at night, time for the AARP members to turn in.
for ineffectual wankers and people who can't sustain an intelligent argument.... and otherwise laughable twats 
but now that I am back from my morning 10k (I run 10k five mornings a week in less than 45 minutes) and am about to hit the weights (I still bench press 50% more than I weigh...) I'm in a good mood so I'll just put you on my "ignore" list
There is no such thing as an "intelligent argument".
but now that I am back from my morning 10k (I run 10k five mornings a week in less than 45 minutes) and am about to hit the weights (I still bench press 50% more than I weigh...) I'm in a good mood so I'll just put you on my "ignore" list
... and you are right only boys ware short pants.
Like I said it's my issue(if you consider it an issue)... and no one else's.
I just know what I like, no tall women do not frighten me.
I look at her and just want to feed her a giant ribeye.
-- Modified on 5/31/2014 12:46:40 AM
The important thing is to review when a review is needed:
1. Amazingly good or bad experiences;
2. A well-reviewed provider with no recent reviews;
3. A new provider with no or few reviews;
4. When a provider and I agree that a review will be written.
Screw what anyone else thinks... just score as YOU choose, as YOU saw YOUR experience. That's the ONLY honest review!!!!
And BTW, I think DA is correct; when you look at a review history for a provider, there are common themes and a distribution of scores with a central tendency. If you screen out obvious outliers, you will see that most providers have a very consistent score, maybe plus or minus 1 or 2 points. And that is for both appearance and performance.
Review when needed, and review HONESTLY, based upon YOUR experience. Anything else is literally a fake review.
I am attracted to a variety of women: tall, short, petite, thick, athletic, thin... whatever attracts ME.
You may not like my choices, or anyone else's for that matter. You probably won't like my review ratings in some cases.
Choose women that YOU are attracted to for your OWN reasons and tastes. Don't rely on what others think. Clearly, we'll all have our own opinions. As many might disagree with your own review ratings.
How can you possibly have a problem with ratings if you only see women that YOU find attractive?
That's what I think, especially where it comes to the numerical designation, of a woman's beauty/worth.
Having said that, why a gal with the physique of a prepubescent boy, garners a ten is beyond me.
She garners a 10 because some guy who loves that look saw her and gave it to her. I don't get it either but it was not my experience nor is it my place to judge.
Judge what?
You stated an opinion about what you claimed to be an "issue".
Maybe you should sleep it off.
and it really doesn't matter if the person truly is an idiot, or simply being intentionally obtuse, the only real way to deal with such a person is to write them off as TSTTT.
It's not really surprising that Pimples uses the "debating tactics" of a five year old, the thing that does surprise me is the fact that so many people actually engage him when he does so. Just like another famous board troll confessed to me one day "TERmites are soooo easy" and he was correct, someone here will always rise to the bait of an obvious board troll and that's why there will always be trolls here.
After the last two I had decided not to bother.
She didn't deserve a ten.
You said it wasn't your experience to judge, but you object to the reviewer's score.
Remember, prepubesent judges existed before judgment.
You won't find me talking about judging anywhere in this thread.
about those people who pass judgment. 
I was simply making an even, objective, observation, whilst translating the three into a unified assessment.
10's don't appear for no reason you know.
And don't be obsessed with the numbers as the text of the reviews is more determinative. I am not into the Kate Moss look, some guys love that look.
I weed those out by the reviews/pm, and if you do, you'll be less surprised when you meet up, as long as you keep expectations lower than you might in the civie world.
Performance and personality also skew a reviewers perspective. If the guy feels like the girl was "into him", great in bed and did all his fav menu options, he'll likely bump her a few points in the looks dept.
But if the girl is a cold fish both in the sack and interpersonal skill wise, you might see guys deduct a few points from an other wise hot piece of tail.
The ratings are completely subjective, and oftentimes based on how giddy and satiated the gent feels after the date. Pictures on a web site are a better indicator of looks, but photo enhancement and alteration technology is so pervasive you need to take some of it with a grain of salt. Visual enticement appears to be an important aspect of male arousal, so you quite naturally want to be with someone you are physically attracted to. Do as much research as you can, there's no shortage of it on the internet. However, in the end, your first session is essentially a crap shoot, similar to a blind date in the real world.
Is that
Guys have different tastes. I like spinners for appearance. Some like DDs
Sometimes providers lobby for higher scores
Sometimes the performance influences the appearance score. If a lady really blew me away (pun intended), I would probably be a little generous on the appearance as well. The reverse is also true.
Some guys don't realize that 10 is once in a lifetime, so they should only give it out once in their lifetime
I've never heard this discussed here, but I think there must be regional differences in how guys in different areas score (both for looks and performance). I've seen gorgous visitors with surprisingly low ratings, and the opposite too.
Would be if TER posted ten pics of women, each embodying a rating. The most beautiful would be a 10. The second most beautiful a 9. And so on down to a 1. Then reviewers would all have the same standard to compare their latest lady to.
When I write a review on a company, fuck if I care what the others are saying. I read that shit BEFORE I make a large purchase.
If a place moves me enough to write a review that will be beneficial to them or tell others about bad service, I write a review. it's not for me or for other consumers. It's for or against the company. If they go above and beyond for me, i get excited and want to help them out a bit. It really effects me when someone goes out of their way to service me well. i think it shows character and conviction. So in return, i try to scratch their back.
If they're complete assholes, bet your ass I'll write a review. And it won't be to warn others. I don't care about them really. I want to make the bad business pay for not giving ME what was advertised.
Just being honest lol.