Does a provider's beauty tend to inflate her performance score, so that a 9-10 might get a 9-10 performance whereas a 6-7 might only get a 7-8 based upon the same performance, all other things being equal.

now i am probably gonna take a lot of heat for this one

Her performance inflates her appearance score, example...Girl in Vegas only did massages, her looks scores where 9's, some 8's. Now she has expanded her menu and now she's getting 10's across the board. Good bye to the 9's. We guys get blinded after we just got laid that we come out with our head up our asses.....me included.

-- Modified on 1/5/2016 10:53:54 AM

If she is a heffer and hideous, sure enough some dude will drop a 7 or 8 on her because she was "so nice."

but I agree with you 100%. There are a LOT of guys who won't give a HDH a low score no matter how much she deserves it. There are also a lot of guys who follow the herd and won't give a $200 hr hooker a high score unless and until someone else rates her highly first.  It's just one of the many reasons I pay next to no attention to the numerical scores.

Giving you or anyone else for that matter a 10 when the service is that good. Some fees less and some more, sometimes not at all. You earned (hate that term) your 10 and are gorgoeus.  

In my experience ladies with well deserved high performance scores tend to have undeserved inflated appearance scores.
This seems to be especially true when it comes to ladies that provide greek.

My premise was that the price was the same for both the "6" and the "9" and not taking about a HDH.  Thinking more in the 250-400 range which seems typical here in the Midwest (also known as "Flyover Country" for those of you on the Coasts) but that's another discussion.  I guess I agree with the other comments that the numbers are basically meaningless and the narrative reviews are key.

And no one likes fucking poetry. 😜

I thought his hooker GF was 5K an hour ...?
Maybe I'm starting to get my TER Douche Bags confused?,
but there's soooo damn many

eom

I thought it was "high dollar an hour" or providers who bill 1K to start.  

there wouldn't be so much debate about them, lol!

sounds about right thx

somebody just watched "the big short" lol!

... if the provider gives an excellent performance, then she deserves a high performance rating.  

you should not even be commenting on this one...you left me 8 for looks...)and you are my friend and neighbor....?

No matter how much money I spent on a provider, that does NOT reflect in my ratings of her.

There are people in all price ranges that have ratings that people would argue against, high and low. When I first started I was convinced that every full 10/10 was a supermodel. Went to my first M&G and realized they were people...JUST like supermodels who don't always look like a 10. So much of it has to do with presentation, makeup, posturing,etc. We choose what our time is valued at and they choose whether or not to pay.  

I would argue that, on one hand, really hot providers often receive inflated performance scores because the clients either simply enjoyed fucking such a hot woman or because they do not want to offend or hurt the providers by giving them notably lower performance ratings. On the other hand, I would argue that strong performers sometimes (but less frequently) receive inflated appearance ratings because their strong performances made them seem more physically attractive or because reviewers do not want to offend or hurt the providers.

I think review scores are also somewhat regional. Most of my highest scores have been from gentleman outside of the Midwest. Typically gentleman in the Midwest seem to score much lower than other parts of the country and I often wonder why.

i pulled it out of my ass alright)what you say sounds good on paper, it does not happen in reality...human psychology is an interesting thing

I agree,
The guy substantiates his stupid decision to pay such a donation
by justifying it with her probably normal performance.

A perennial topic, and one that requires some common sense and flexibility more than the eternal search for objective truth.  Yet it commands attention because a falsified or phony review can ruin a customer's experience or harm an attractive provider's sincere performance, and consequently her well-deserved income.  So of course the debate will continue, but what's the solution?

Since I don't see 1000 an hour ladies their inflated scores, whether earned or no, matter little.

you said, "6-9"!