Doesn't there have to be a donation left for a "Review" to be written?

IE: A "walk-away" cannot "Review" the provider he walked away from. Correct????

You only have to meet. Ive seen ROB reviews where the guy walked with his coin.

If the session never took place, there can be no review.  There are other ways to alert people about B&S or ROBs, mostly back-channel.

The guy didn't like the apartments 'atmosphere'. Allergies?? Hyper-sensitive??? So he declined.
No donation, no service too report on. Only personal, subjective "slams" and scores in stark contrast with other accounts given.

Are individual sensitivities to aeromatic conditions in a providers incall now justifiable reason for ROB reviews?

if it's better homes & garden, or renters guide lol

,now go and blow it out your poop hole

*disclaimer*  
above statement too dumb to be deemed derogatory

I was just about to start a new thread about shill reviews: I've seen what I am sure are more and more of them in my local regions. I recently thought I was going to see a 9/9 but it was disappointing 6/6. The first reviewer (9/9) was first reviewer of several providers, all at the same agency. But I'll post here instead.

See the two reviews of Macie TER ID: 180538.  jaymesv has 2 "first reviews" of two girls at the same place, both 8/8 and he (she?) has no other reviews. The other review of Macie tells a very important story.

jamesv says "Gentle / Soothing"; roger says "Threatening / Dangerous". He didn't leave a tip and, fortunately, didn't leave any of his blood or guts, either. I think these kinds of reviews and warnings should be allowed, even if they are outside the official rules. I say, stretch the rules and let them in and let them stay.

I don't know about any back channel to find this info. TER reviews are my primary source.