TER General Board

Providers - would you see a client if you know he is a tough grader?
team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 2111 reads
posted
1 / 71

Ie, if you were to see him and he were to leave a review he'd likely to lower your average scores.

Would you still see him or refuse to see him? Or maybe see him with a stipulation that he doesn't write a review?

 
Thanks in advance
R

WIMissScarlet See my TER Reviews 40 reads
posted
2 / 71

"Tough grader" can mean one of two things: honest feedback and critiques, or just your run of the mill asshole. There are a lot more important criteria I use to determine if I will see a client, their reviews are pretty far down on my list. I don't care one way or another if someone writes a review of me, so I would never give a stipulation of not writing one, not a factor for me. Honestly first impressions are HUGE, so in the first message I want to see from a gentleman is that he is polite, cordial, respectful, honest, and to the point. The run of the mill assholes usually are going to weed themselves out with this basic criteria, so even getting to the session and a review are going to be an obstacle for the run of the mill assholes to accomplish. So, in closing, I do not entertain run of the mill assholes so I am not concerned with run of the mill asshole "tough graders."  

cks175 44 Reviews 30 reads
posted
3 / 71

So you rule out the “tough graders” before they ever get to writing a review.  Have you ever read a review and decided the guy was an asshole based on the content of his review?

WIMissScarlet See my TER Reviews 34 reads
posted
4 / 71

Nope, not what I said. LOL  
I rule out ass holes, not "tough graders."  
And yes, I have read reviews by guys that I could tell just by he way they write their reviews that they are assholes. Assholes write their reviews just to hurt the feelings of the provider,  they are not writing the review to give feedback or constructive criticism. There are also people that you can never please no matter how good of service is provided, which you can also see in the review. Just be honest and state of facts.  

TiannaTemptation See my TER Reviews 49 reads
posted
5 / 71

Understood that this directed to Scarlett but felt compelled to chime in.  

 
I absolutely have made excuses not to see a client based on his review history. Not because he was a “tough grader” but because he indicated that he may be disrespectful or rough during a session.   Another no see indicator is if a previous review indicated participation in BBFS.  

 
Honest reviews of sessions that weren’t up to expectations are not an issue unless they show a pattern of all falling short of expectations.  

-- Modified on 1/20/2025 5:20:38 PM

brownjack 1 Reviews 37 reads
posted
6 / 71

"The first message I want to see from a gentleman is that he is polite, cordial, respectful, honest, and to the point."

Something for all clients to remember.  Thank you Scarlet.

P.S.  I would venture to add, "and informed on my policies."

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 32 reads
posted
7 / 71

So first you classify a client into a category, and then make the decision based on that category.

Also interesting about asshole nomenclature. I never heard of a "run of the mill" asshole classification haha. Guess I'm not an expert in types of assholes.

 
I should probably rephrase my question as "do you ever make decision to not see a client solely based on his review history".

QueenBia See my TER Reviews 49 reads
posted
8 / 71

Some reviews I read & I hit the like button. I am looking for chemistry, so if I read reviews that are derogatory, degrading, or just rude I tend to shy away from those individuals. Why would I want to share my time with anyone who does not love & appreciate the hard working women of leisure? Aka SW  

It’s, like the many people who reach out without respectfully reading the content created. Why email a Provider if you did not read her website?  

Things that make you go… hmhmhmhm.

WIMissScarlet See my TER Reviews 39 reads
posted
9 / 71

No, I do not make a decision just based on reviews. If you look at the whole state of Wisconsin there is an average of maybe 2 or 3 new reviews a day, and there probably are about 500 providers in the state, just not that many guys write them anymore. Unless a guy specifically tells me he has an account here and has written reviews I am not going to ask or go out of my way to look for reviews.

paigesavage See my TER Reviews 39 reads
posted
10 / 71

This is an interesting question! I do take the time to check out reviews because they can provide insight into a potential client’s preferences and expectations. That said, I’ve never declined an inquiry solely because someone seems like a tough grader. However, I have noticed a correlation between tough graders and the level of difficulty they present during the screening process—for example, not providing all the required information upfront or negotiating screening practices, trying to bypass deposit policies, or not honoring cancellation fees when canceling last minute.

 
The only time I ever bring up reviews is in two specific scenarios:
1. If they’ve never met a provider of color.
2. If they’ve never met a provider with my body type (e.g., if their reviews consistently mention “athletic,” “slim,” or “average” as their preference).

 
Even in those cases, I don’t decline to see them. Instead, I make a point to ensure they genuinely want to meet me. If they’re accustomed to a particular aesthetic or experience, I want to confirm they’re open to variety and won’t leave feeling disappointed.

 
Perhaps, my approach stems from a lesson ingrained in me from a young age (and reinforced by pop culture—thank you, Papa Pope from Scandal): the idea that I often have to be “twice as good to get half of what they have.” It’s something I’ve carried with me, and it motivates me to approach every interaction with professionalism and care (although sometimes my patience has been tested and my sass has hit a 10 lol).  

 
Ultimately, I won’t decline to see a tough grader, it’s just they normally filter themselves out on their own due to their own behavior.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 35 reads
posted
11 / 71

Thanks for the follow up response as well!

I thought - not that you'd care what I think - both your original and current response are perfectly reasonable and make sense.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 32 reads
posted
12 / 71

It's always great to hear what providers have to say. And insightful too. Much appreciated!

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 41 reads
posted
13 / 71

Nobody ever give him credit for anything ,so he sees  venting  on providers as a way of  hitting back.  
When I see good providers with one or two negative reviews - the  red flagi  is  on that client in my views, and so investigate further.  

For example, some guys believe that just because they are spending a few dollars, they can behave  in any manner and it should be accepted , if not, then comes the negative reviews.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 48 reads
posted
14 / 71

What do you mean good providers with negative reviews?

How do you determine theyre "good"? Do you mean those you have seen yourself and consider good?

Do you think two different people could be completely honest about their sessions and have drastically different experiences and different scores (ie one negative and one positive)?

 
It's weird that you automatically assume a negative review must mean something wrong with the reviewer. Ie, you inherently place more trust in the seller than the reviewer.

AnnaAnnis See my TER Reviews 45 reads
posted
15 / 71

Preach sister!

Peace Anna

Rafl 57 reads
posted
16 / 71

Why do you need to make excuses? If that’s how you feel just tell the person.

Posted By: TiannaTemptation
Re: review  (Interesting Reply)
Understood that this directed to Scarlett but felt compelled to chime in.    
   
   
 I absolutely have made excuses not to see a client based on his review history. Not because he was a “tough grader” but because he indicated that he may be disrespectful or rough during a session.   Another no see indicator is if a previous review indicated participation in BBFS.  
   
   
 Honest reviews of sessions that weren’t up to expectations are not an issue unless they show a pattern of all falling short of expectations.    

-- Modified on 1/20/2025 5:20:38 PM

420Smoka4Eva 37 reads
posted
17 / 71

I don't think Boobsman inherently places more trust in providers than reviewers. I think Boobsman is talking a particular kind of reviewer, not every reviewer. I think he is describing a trend I have noticed.
.
I like to read reviews and I always start with the highest ratings and lowest ratings to set expectations. This approach has worked well for me over the years. Sometimes I've noticed that the guys with higher ratings are paying for premium services while the guys with lower ratings have  tended to pay for shorter sessions or didn't pay for upcharges like GFE or Greek. I tend to align my expectations with my intentions. If I book a short stay I won't expect a 9 or a 10, but if I book a more expensive date I'm not going to listen to the guy booking a half hour. I also listen more to guys who like the same things I do. I check a reviewers history to see in general what they are looking for. Over time I have been able to assess the credibility of certain reviewers. I'll even research providers they have seen and reviewed well.
.
Sometimes there will be providers with a good overall average score with one or two very negative reviews. I'll check the review history of a negative reviewer. I'll see very few, if any, good or great scores. Their reviews are very negative and can be 3 or 4 points below the average. Sometimes I'll notice they gave a negative review to a provider I had seen and previously reviewed. After a while I have recognized a few of these guys and have learned to discount everything they say. I have been rewarded. When it comes to reviewers there are simps and there are scrubs. You have to learn to sort through both of them because they both like to be very loud.

j86568 171 Reviews 37 reads
posted
18 / 71

One provider I wanted to see did this, she wasn't sure that she wanted to see me because I hadn't reviewed anyone like her before. I was able to put her at ease and we had a great meeting. She retired years ago.  

I've also had some providers excited to meet me because of review content, and also providers who were concerned about the certain content, like rough sex. The key is to always be a gentleman and explain. For example with the rough sex, I only do it if provider is into it.

Nowadays I only review when the provider asks me to since my review count is so high. Actually also finding that some providers are intimidated to meet. And had at least one who said she wouldn't meet me because of my high review count.

I think it's a good thing that providers read reviewer reviews because they can get a sense of compatibility and demeanor. It helps with expectations and ultimately want the client to have a good time. Better to not meet the client than to have a disappointed or angry client because they expected certain services or looks.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 35 reads
posted
19 / 71

"could be completely honest about their sessions and have drastically different experiences and different scores (ie one negative and one positive)?"

 
Yes, if one of them was you.  Lol

 
There can be a wide difference of opinion when it comes to provider appearance, because we all like what we like, but most mongers with a reasonable amount of experience will agree on what constitutes good or bad service.  You can go back through years of threads on this topic of discussion and find that is the case.  There are always outliers, like the Kinksters, but most normal customers know good service when they experience it, and vice versa.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 30 reads
posted
20 / 71

The first question, may I remind, was how he determined a provider is good. Is it by majority of reviews being good? We just had a provider who had all of her reviews being great, and then it turned out it was a scam.

 
In such scenario, if you go by majority you would also consider a negative review an outlier, yet the reality is actually the other way around. Majority good reviews simply does not follow that a provider is good. Now if Boobsman has actually seen the provider and considers her good, that is another thing.  

 
And hence came my second question. I asked is it possible that two people would review a product honestly and both have drastically different opinions. The answer of course is a resounding "Yes" to me but I want to see what Boobsman thinks.

A product such as iPhone has thousands upon thousands of reviews and some people really like it and some don't.
Is it something wrong with all of those who dislike it or give ratings of 3 or below out of five stars? Or maybe they all have some real gripes with performance, functionality, ecosystem that other people might not consider important?

 
Ie, if you let other reviews influence you or second guess yourself because you think your opinion is not of majority what does it say? I think it says a lot and it's kinda sad because it promotes sheep/hive mind behavior rather than actually expressing own opinion.

-- Modified on 1/22/2025 3:09:16 PM

TiannaTemptation See my TER Reviews 43 reads
posted
21 / 71

There are a few reasons I would avoid telling clients I’m not seeing them based on review history.  First I simply don’t feel the need to debate their behavior. I have found that many would simply turn around and argue that they will treat you better, that they aren’t really that way, etc.  However get them behind closed doors and those behaviors tend to show.   I also don’t want these guys getting angry and retaliating in any fashion, like writing a fake review, if I refuse to see them.  I don’t want to discourage them from showing their true personalities in their reviews as I like the insight that helps me have enjoyable dates.  

 
It’s just so much easier to claim unavailability due to a busy schedule or another reason that has nothing to do with the client personally.

cks175 44 Reviews 39 reads
posted
22 / 71

Good answer. It’s certainly a situation where a diplomatic tact is better than a blunt one.

420Smoka4Eva 38 reads
posted
23 / 71

You wrote a post on a public forum, not a DM so anyone can reply. Those are the rules. You're getting unsolicited answers from the peanut gallery whether you like it or not. Anyway, to answer your question, there is only one way to find out if a provider is actually good or not. That is to see one. That is the whole point of this endeavor. We're looking for people to have fun with. However, this whole endeavor is risky and expensive so we use reviews to get the best bang for our buck. Maybe in your mind, the best reviewed providers with the best scores aren't necessarily the best. There are always outliers but my experience is completely different. The best providers tend to have consistently great reviews. I said earlier you have to avoid the simps and the scrubs, you also have to avoid the scams.  
.
Nobody here is getting influenced or swayed. We're simply gathering information to determine who or what is right for us. I'm not talking about discounting bad reviews, I'm talking about discounting information from certain reviewers. There's nothing wrong with a negative review and they are very helpful (which is why I read them). However, would you ask a vegetarian to review a steakhouse? There are reviewers with a lot of negative reviews and I wonder if they even enjoy doing this. On the other hand, there are guys on here that really enjoy the company of providers. Which opinion do you think I prefer?

cks175 44 Reviews 33 reads
posted
24 / 71

We just had a provider who had all of her reviews being great, and then it turned out it was a scam
Apples and oranges. The topic here is providers and the mongers who review them (apples), not scams (oranges).
Now if Boobsman has actually seen the provider and considers her good, that is another thing

Another falsehood. Booobsman’s intelligent enough to recognize trends and spot outliers. He doesn’t need to see her in order to know whether she’s “good” or not.
I think it says a lot and it's kinda sad because it promotes sheep/hive mind behavior rather than actually expressing own opinion
Another falsehood. Using analytics to judge providers and determine a reviewer’s reliability is not hive mind behavior.

SK63 16 Reviews 37 reads
posted
25 / 71

Women love assholes

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 43 reads
posted
26 / 71

never joined a thread and answered questions posed to someone else (we ALL know you have), so what is the point of leading with that on this one?  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 35 reads
posted
27 / 71

Let him answer the questions I posed.

 
As for your post it doesn't make any sense.

Boobsman said the term "good providers" and I've asked for clarification from him.

How does he determine that a provider is good? I didn't ask you about it. I've asked him.

 
There are all kind of sellers/provided listed. Some are scams. Some are ripoffs.

 
I've also asked him about whether same products or services can have opposite opinions and both be honest.  

I've read online reviews of many products and services  for 30+ years. And yes, it is clearly possible for product or service to have completely polarizing opinions with all those opinions being honest and accurate. It happens all the time. Even in something as banal as movies, some people really like movies other people hate. And vice versa.  

 
Boobsman said if someone he considers good has negative reviews it tells them there's something wrong with them.

 
So I asked - if by the same logic all people who have given a known product that is considered a non scammy product in general, such as iPhone, or Samsung TV,  a negative review.... Does he also think something is wrong wit them?

Or it's possible they simple had a different experiences and they looked for different things in the product or service? Or movie. Or food. Or pussy.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 33 reads
posted
28 / 71

but are you trying to convince others that when most mongers have a positive experience, and you have a negative experience, there are times when YOU will be one who's right, and everyone else is wrong?  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 43 reads
posted
29 / 71

Tiannas way is simply lying to the client, how is it "diplomatic"?  

She deliberately misleads the customer to believe he is not seen because of another reason, while the truth is completely different.  

 
If this tactic was done by the client, he would be dubbed a "time waster".  

 

But I guess I forget that in this biz lying to client on purpose and misleading is considered completely normal and a "diplomatic tact".

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 46 reads
posted
30 / 71

And he loves the movie and I don't like it, it doesn't make anyone wrong or right. We both saw the movie and had our own evaluation and explanation why its good or bad.  

 

But you - like a kindergarten level a student - base your evaluation of what other people think, not yourself.

 
Instead of telling me what you think of the movie you instead see what other people tend to say and align yourself with majority.

 

Justike it seems you're incapable of understanding that a score of "3 isn't" bashing", it seems you're incapable of understanding that two people can have very different opinions while not being wrong in anything.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 39 reads
posted
31 / 71

Or else you are dodging it.  I'm not talking about a two-person disagreement.  If you see a provider that has ONE review, you have a 50% change of agreeing or disagreeing with the reviewer.  If you see a provider with ten reviews and one is negative, you have a 90% of agreeing with the majority, or a 10% change of agreeing with the minority.  Which odds do you like better?  I'm still going to write my own review and go with my own opinion, but the sole reason for the visit is not the review, its the hot session with a lovely woman.  A mostly positive review history that's giving me the opinions of other like-minded mongers merely stacks the odds in my favor that I will have a good time, and this has proven to be the case time after time.  

 
Movies are subjective just like opinions of providers' appearances.  However, thread after thread on this board shows that MOST mongers know good service when they see it, versus bad, and this is reflected in the number of positive reviews that MOST mongers look for when considering a visit to a particular woman.  How many mongers, beside you, actively seek out providers with MOSTLY negative reviews?  I would submit that it's only a fraction.  

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 44 reads
posted
32 / 71

http://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/ad-populum-fallacy

What is ad populum fallacy

 
An ad populum fallacy occurs when we use an “argumentum ad populum” (Latin for “argument to the people”), meaning that we make an appeal to what most people think, like, or believe, instead of justifying our position with evidence.

When we are trying to persuade someone about our ideas, preferences, or beliefs, it is often tempting to simply claim that the majority of the people agree with us. Words that imply that many people believe, do, or buy something (such as “the majority,” “lots,” or “most”) are typical to this fallacy.

However, this type of argument is fallacious. Even if the claim is true, popularity alone is not a sufficient reason to accept it as such. The fact that most people may be in favor of the claim is not an adequate substitute for actual evidence (for example, for centuries people believed that the earth was the center of the solar system, but this was ultimately proved to be false).

-- Modified on 1/23/2025 11:59:42 AM

 

 
Now let's count how many times you attempted to say "most". Yes most people may love an iPhone or movie. Yet some other people might not like them. Their opinion is just as valuable as the majority. But you're too stupid to understand this it seems.

-- Modified on 1/23/2025 12:01:31 PM

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 41 reads
posted
33 / 71

Binary thinking, so the only solution is for you to choose providers in a way that works for you, and I will choose a way that works for me.  Since you posted once that about half of all the sessions you have are disappointing, compared to about 2% for me, I would think it would behoove you to be a little more open-minded, but there is no getting your eyes off the windmill.  Joust away.  

 
I read your link (what a waste of time) and it's pretty clear you have no idea how to apply this principal to P4P with any kind of accuracy or favorable odds based on numbers.  In other words, the principal is academic and has no application in  the sex business.  Once again, you blow up your own argument.  

-- Modified on 1/23/2025 12:24:57 PM

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 45 reads
posted
34 / 71

It's not academic cdl, it's applicable to ANY aspect in life.  

Don't be a sheep. Don't automatically assume the majority is right. And don't discount the minority like they're wrong.

 
If 90% of people like a movie, there is nothing "wrong" with the 10% who didn't like the movie. They didn't like it and they have a right to review it without being looked at as "wrong".

RespectfulRobert 49 reads
posted
35 / 71

Let me let you in on a little secret. Sometimes people lie. Shocking, I know. But where I draw a huge difference is between someone that lies to deliberately hurt someone versus a lie when not lying will cause more agg and heartache. Tianna gave you VERY good reasons as to why a provider may have to lie to a client here and there. Just bc YOU don't see the issue down the road that her experience and spider sense tells her will occur if she doesn't lie, doesn't mean it's not a real thing.
.
Yes, in a perfect world people shouldn't have the need to lie but as you know (but as I think about it, you may not) our little world of ours isn't perfect. And when you scale it down even further, to just the corner of the world that deals with p4p, it becomes even less perfect for many.
.
For all the great clients out there, and providers will universally tell you that that is the vast majority of them, there are some real obsessed assholes, creeps, stage 5 clingers and psychologically damaged men. Now before you go off on your tit for tat argument (pun intended) yes, there are evil and mentally ill providers as well. Any decent girl in the biz will tell you they have run across a few women here and there that would fall into that camp.
.
Point being is that YOU dont have to deal with the ramifications of a 100% truth policy. But Tianna, and virtually every provider does. There are some guys that can make the girl in question life much more difficult as she states. She wants to evade arguing with a stranger on the internet. A guy that she does not know if he is mentally stable or not. She wants to avoid getting that revenge laced fake review that would cause her heartache, pain, aggravation and potentially hurt her purse.
.
Seriously, does all this REALLY need to be said to you??? Oh THATS right. You're the guy that thinks p4p is governed by the FTC. Here's a helpful hint...don't be that guy.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 45 reads
posted
36 / 71

What did you say cdl?

Ah yes - you said that they cannot. Or rather, some silly shot at me.  

And then you admitted two people cna have different opinions of the same movie.  

 
Keep digging further. It's fascinating..
You are bad debater.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 40 reads
posted
37 / 71

I actually barely criticized Tianna. I do think by lying she gives a client false hope that there's a chance and he might keep on trying. Wasting everyone's time. Imo she could just say no I won't see you bye. But again I'm not enforcing my opinion on her.  

 
My main issue with the post - if you cared to read it - was that a lie (a lie is a lie, just like a spade is a spade) was presented by cks as "diplomatic tact"

That's no diplomaric tact. It's just a plain ol lie. Doesn't take tact or diplomacy to lie. Just like a random woman telling a guy whos hitting on her that she's taken even if she isn't. That's not diplomacy, it's a lie.  

 
Don't be afraid of "lie" having a negative connotation. Don't be afraid of perception - this is a common issue I see. If it's a lie it's a lie. We are all adults here. The constant need to sugar coat things, constant use of euphemisms etc serve no purpose other than to obfuscate or soften criticism. It's pointless.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 37 reads
posted
38 / 71

You and I don't always agree, but this is one of your best posts.  You even prompted me to look up the 5 stages of clinging again. Lol

 
And YES, this is the guy who thinks the FTC is going to step in and regulate the truthfulness of provider reviews and clamp down on Blacklisting by providers and agencies.  Must be from inhaling the smoke from the California wildfires for the past year.  Lol

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 43 reads
posted
39 / 71

Ask the board how many people will choose to see a provider who has a greater number of negative reviews than positive.  As Smoke said, we use reviews to HELP us decide who see so that we get the best bang for the buck and don't waste that money.   I know I wouldn't see one like this unless that negatives were loaded on the front end when she started (which often happens with new providers while they are learning their craft) and the more recent reviews (last 6-12 months) are much better (which means she figured it out and has improved).

RespectfulRobert 44 reads
posted
40 / 71

You say "Imo she could just say no I won't see you bye." Don't you think she tried that in the past? Ask any provider and they will tell you it's not nearly as easy as you think it is or would like it to be. Again, this is a real world thing vs. how you think the world works.  
.
The follow up from the guy would be "What? Why wont you see me?" and he may not walk away for 5 or more emails trying to get her to explain herself. It's just easier to do what she did. That is her experience on how to deal with those matters. You don't have to ever deal with a client in this realm so give her some slack and acknowledgment that she does what she does for her reasons based on her numerous interactions with potential clients. That should be good enough for you. It certainly is for me.  
.
With regards to CKS "diplomatic tact" point, don't you think that is VERY petty? Whether or not he used the exact, perfect verbiage to state his point is up to others to decide as I could care less, but any rational person would understand what he meant. You are taking him WAY too literally and I think that is most likely due to the fact that you two feud here often. Isn't THAT the real reason why you were so incredibly picky about his post? That's how it came off to me.

bofia 26 Reviews 38 reads
posted
41 / 71

Unless they are hard up for cash, no professional, of any service,  would knowingly see a potential client who has a consistent history of writing negative reviews.  I use that term instead of "tough grader" because that's essentially what it is in the eyes of the provider.
Who needs that?
The reason providers don't delist is so they can use their reviews for marketing.

TiannaTemptation See my TER Reviews 50 reads
posted
42 / 71

You are correct when you say that in the scenario described, I am lying. I’m ok with doing so to avoid the drama and potential negative fallout from being truthful.  

 

Team_rocket_qwerty,  first let me say that I’ve read some of your reviews and you can be blunt but you are not rough and demeaning. The guys I’m talking about are describing behavior such as shoving themselves down a girls throat despite her obvious discomfort, or similar acts that demonstrate a lack of respect for the provider and her boundaries. Often times these fellows seem negative in general, like they despise the girls they are seeing.  I see no advantage in even engaging with these types of customers and I don’t want to tell them why I’m turning them down because I feel that will provoke them.  

 

It has also been my personal opinion that these guys are super persistent, if I tell them I am not interested in seeing them then they somehow consider that a challenge and don’t want to give up.  They stubbornly insist on trying to change my mind.  

 

While telling lies that make excuses not to see them that have nothing to do with them personally is not foolproof in every case, it’s typically considerably more effective and easier.  Sure it’s a lie, and it’s an easy way out, but I’m okay with that.

420Smoka4Eva 43 reads
posted
43 / 71

You seem to have a hard time with nuance. A lot of your comparisons fall flat because there are differences, sometimes subtle and sometimes obvious. The first difference is that watching a movie is a fairly passive experience. You just sit there and watch it. You can't change how the movie ends who was cast in it. Meanwhile hiring an escort is an active experience. You are an active participant and have an impact on how it goes. If you show up un-showered with bad breath  and a bad attitude you're probably not going to have a good time. The other issue is, not every movie is meant for every person. Lets say that movie you're describing is an action movie and the 10% of people who hate it don't like action movies. Well, they're not wrong but the movie is not for them. If I love action movies, I'm going to listen to the 90% and not the 10%. You are completely correct that the 10% isn't wrong since everything is a subjective experience. That's why some sources are more trustworthy than others.

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 37 reads
posted
44 / 71

How long you been around; you don't good providers. Who do you date. You should be asking yourself those questions.  As for me I certainly know good providers - I have dated many of them and there are many more that I would date.
I have been around  and am telling you,some people just got to give a bad grade no matter what. Does every client does it - absolutely not. Does it happen all to often absolutely yes. Well how do I know this. Here are a few examples : look at the reputation of both  the provider and the client .Talk to the provider to hear her side ,because the platform does not allow rebuttals to reviews.
As I always said good Providers (if you know what that means) don't have a good reputation and get great reviews consistently  by accident .  
So as I said before, and as often I have seen it - investigate first. Am not going to accept the reviews of cheap ass clients who book a 15 minutes date and want to cram all services in that time frame for example, when all she offers is a blow job in a 15 minute date. Or, he the clients showed up being fucked up in one way or another. These are just a few scenarios, hope it helps you.Again ,am talking about GOOD REPUTABLE PROVIDERS -If you know what that means yet,

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 35 reads
posted
45 / 71

Thank you for breaking it down for him.If that does not explain if for him ,then he is either a slow learner or one of the guilty culprits,

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 41 reads
posted
46 / 71

Very clever Tianna, that's a subtle way of avoiding a shithole client who would unjustly hurt your reputation.

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 42 reads
posted
47 / 71

As a client who often read reviews before booking dates,I see that problem very often.  Many of them are cheap clients who often wants more for less.

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 37 reads
posted
48 / 71

Totally agree with you WIMissScarlet . I actually wrote a response to the original tread without reading through your responses,  As a client I often skim through reviews of reputable providers for help in making the dating decision.  
Some people just have to give a bad grade no matter what .....seen this far  too often . After I investigate, I often  realize the problem is with them, the client.  Either too cheap wanting more for less ,or they are just fucked up in one way or another.  

TER need to create a section for providers response to reviews.

ladywhistledown See my TER Reviews 40 reads
posted
49 / 71

on his overall history. I look at reviews that he's done to first see if he's ever provided a good review. If he hasn't that is a red flag. Also, for girls he has reviewed, where does his review fall within the average ratings that the girls have? For example there's nothing wrong with a guy giving a low score to a girl who consistently has low scores but if the girls you see are pulling mostly 9s and you're always at least 2 - 3 points below their average? Yeah I'd rather not see you because you're likely just out to artificially reduce ratings.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 38 reads
posted
50 / 71

No, it's not petty.

I want a lie be operated on as a lie. Not some diplomatic tact bs.

 
Im so tired of useless euphemismd designed to stop hurting feelings. If it's a lie, then embrace the lie.

As far as your first point, I've already said - if the roles were reversed, the client would be called a time waster.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 35 reads
posted
51 / 71

Posted By: Boobsman100
Re: Quite the stretch Mr. Fantastic
Thank you for breaking it down for him.If that does not explain if for him ,then he is either a slow learner or one of the guilty culprits,
So because I don't agree with what you said I'm either a slow learner or a guilty culprit? Wow what logic.  

 
Guilty of what? I can't be a slow learner because I've read thousands uookn of thosudands of customer reviews.

 
It seems you don't want to abide by the fact that reviews are evaluation of subjective experiences designed for mongers by mongers.

It's like reviews are fucking social credit. No they're not. Reviews aren't tokens that you give back to the seller. They are evaluations.

You seem to think if a seller pot product or service is well liked anyone who says anything again t it is wrong. You don't think a doctor who's generally liked could eff up during operation? Happens all the tine.

I can't believe how biased you are for providers.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 32 reads
posted
52 / 71

So if a provider wants to do the least for maximized amount of money that's OK, but if client wants a lot for th least amount of money that's bad?

Both are trying to extract as much value as possible. I think it's natural.
Or maybe you're the type who pays mechanics extra free hours for labor out of love for mechanics?  

 
If someone was unhappy with the menu or the length of a sex act, or endurance, reviews are exactly the place to put it. Is it not?  

 
Instead you keep trying to view review as some kind of bone you throw to seller. The reviews are supposed to be for us. And I'd like to know whethrr a girl has good cg endurance or is tired after the minutes on top. If someone wans to fuck for 40 mins nonstop why shouldn't they be disappointed Ted when provider does have good endurance?

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 38 reads
posted
53 / 71

Lol You always want to make this occupation special when it ain't.

 
You don't want use the movie example you can use iPhone example. You cna use doctor and psychologist review examples.

A doctor might be great for most but he also might be facing some malpractice suits.  

Wouldn't you want to hear and read negative reviews about such a doctor?  
Yet if we use the fallacious logic that cdl and boobs are trying to use we arrive at conclusion that people who the doctor  

saying that people who have bad experiences with "generally good" services must have something wrong with them is completely and utterly unfair.  

At least you admit that 10% are not wrong I guess. Cdl can't even do that.

coeur-de-lion 400 Reviews 38 reads
posted
54 / 71

then it is because they were not looking for the same things in a provider that the 90% were looking for.  For instance, if you are looking for a girl that has a lot of piercings and the provider you selected only has one, it stands to reason that you will grade her lower.  It doesn't necessarily make you "wrong" it just makes you out of step with the majority.  However, the review is only useful to the majority if the reviewer TELLS us in the narrative of the review that he graded her down because he was misled into believing she had more piercings.  Many low-scoring reviews never state why the score was lower than her average and so it is often assumed by the reader that it was a negative review when the reviewer did not intend it as such.  

Boobsman100 20 Reviews 33 reads
posted
55 / 71

Actually you are not entirely correct . Just like how a provider screen clients ,' red flag clients' or not, you have the right and opportunity to screen the providers you see as well,to make sure she offers what you're Looking for.  

Yes ,a date with a providers can go wrong for whatever reasons that may not be on you, and can warrant honest reviews.  But ,the point is - who went  wrong?   Are you a good client that did everything right that you were supposed to do ?  

Look, all am saying is ,you must be in the right before writing a negative review, because I  have seen a lot of hypocrisy in many reviews.  

A final important thing is ,are  you bullshitting yourself about being a good guy or not.Because some people actually believe they are when they are not.

team_rocket_qwerty 35 Reviews 39 reads
posted
56 / 71

I also dont get "screening" example. Providers screen for safety. That's perfectly reasonable and understandable.  

Reading reviews for clients to pick out the "right" provider isn't some kind of prerequisite.  
It may be a good way to limit your disappointments, but it certainly is no prerequisite.  

I think you're leading up to this absolutely warped logic where if someone had a bad time and wants to write a bad review you place the blame on the customer somehow. For not researching enough by reading reviews. No, anyone who had a bad time regardless of the circumstance - or even a good time but with lots of cons - is entitled to their opinion and should be able to write their datapoint for others to see

 
Do you read a yelp review of every restaurant you go to? Probably not.  Do you take all recommendations that waiters tell you? Probably not. So if I take something that wasn't recommended but it still on the menu and is not particularly good, I shouldn't write a negative review on it or somehow be in the wrong?  

 
If something is sold  and I bought it  I should be able to review it. It doesn't matter why I bought it.  

 
I dont see why someone who doesn't read reviews, has a bad experience, comes here to write an honest negative review, and then he is the bombarded with nonsense like "you had too high expectations why couldn't you read the other reviews".

This goes against the whole point of reviews as datapoint. Theyre supposed to only help the clients.  

 
If you had a bad experience, went on this site to write up a bad experience and then the fact that the provider has pristine super high scoring reviews stopped you from writing a negative review.... and you started to second guess yourself.... "is it something wrong with me"... this is an abject failure.  

Caring about consequences of review and how you will look if your review stands out should be the very least of your concern. And the number one thing should be sharing your datapoint with others.

badger48 125 Reviews 33 reads
posted
57 / 71

When there are YEMV providers, below par sessions can happen, a roll of the dice that day and time!
I had a Fuckin' great first session with a Jgirl, so I went for a second session, and it was worse than just a dud session.
She did a complete 180, walked out after 15 minutes.
IMO, most reviews have some value, you just have to be able to pick out the info that's has value to you!

Annabankston See my TER Reviews 41 reads
posted
58 / 71

From my experience it’s best to avoid negative people. If all or most of the clients reviews are negative he is probably an angry negative person. Those clients usually cancel appointments last minute, or show up too early or too late for the appointment and overstay an extra 30-hour without tipping, their hygiene is usually bad and they refuse to shower or brush their teeth so of course they would not receive the best service due to that. I have personally never had a client write me a bad review who arrived on time and clean and respectful.

Rafl 31 reads
posted
59 / 71

What score is considered a bad review to you? I had a provider tell me one time. She didn’t care what I put in it. As long as it was 10s.

-- Modified on 1/28/2025 7:14:17 AM

OldRanger 62 Reviews 27 reads
posted
60 / 71

Actually to me a low grader would take an 8/8 provider and give her 7/7 or less ( or something else similar)  and a high grader the reverse .  
I am not disagreeing with you on those whose behavior “earns?”  A providers a low score but there are just some that will write a glarining narative , urge others  to run not walk to see you and then score a full point in each category low.

Rafl 31 reads
posted
61 / 71

I’ve seen some when the guy is super happy she’s great etc etc. Then he gives 6/6. I don’t know. If I was the one offering the service that would frustrate me.

Annabankston See my TER Reviews 35 reads
posted
62 / 71

So any score that’s not 9 or 10 will slow the business down a lot it doesn’t matter how great the actual review itself is. (Also some of my reviews say I’m the most amazing provider they’ve ever been with but the scores are 8 so it doesn’t help the business much)I’ve been told by most clients that they just pick off of the score itself and they don’t look for providers 9 or lower. So I’m assuming anything under 9 is not good

Annabankston See my TER Reviews 33 reads
posted
63 / 71

Yes it is quite frustrating because any score under 9 slows down the business..(thank god for regulars:)) so the great review is nice but the small score puts the provider lower on the list so not sure if the review helps

SinCitySinner 66 Reviews 32 reads
posted
64 / 71

..in the past because some ladies didn't like my reviews.. The smarter ones were those that nicely asked be ahead of time if I would consider not submitting one.. I kindly obliged.  

 
Mutual lose-lose outcome when it could have been a win-win outcome.

cks175 44 Reviews 29 reads
posted
65 / 71

Although I doubt the providers who declined to see you believe they just endured a lose-lose situation.

impposter 49 Reviews 46 reads
posted
66 / 71

Is anyone here familiar with my suggestion to switch to X-out-of-Y Scoring ? I think it's a 10-out-of-10 Suggestion!
.
It's a quirk of the TER system that the MAX score is based on specific things that transpire during a session. Not everybody agrees on TER's "extra points" criteria so many meetings have a MAX score of only 7, 8, or 9 and no chance of a 10.  
.
I have had MANY fantastic 7-out-of-7 and 8-out-of-8 sessions! I think a 7-out-of-7 is a better score than a 7-out-of-10 but the single number scoring doesn't reflect that at all.  
.
Search General, S&P, and Newbie for my posts about X-out-of-Y Scoring:
Search for [scoring] All these words
Author [impposter]

Posted By: Annabankston
Re: Scores don’t match up with the actual review sometimes  
So any score that’s not 9 or 10 will slow the business down a lot it doesn’t matter how great the actual review itself is. (Also some of my reviews say I’m the most amazing provider they’ve ever been with but the scores are 8 so it doesn’t help the business much)I’ve been told by most clients that they just pick off of the score itself and they don’t look for providers 9 or lower. So I’m assuming anything under 9 is not good
I think that a 9-out-of-9 is a GREAT score! Good luck!

mrfisher 112 Reviews 39 reads
posted
67 / 71
36363jensen 4 Reviews 34 reads
posted
68 / 71

I think that approach solves some grading problems but I don't really see it applying here. There will still be reviewers that will write a review that many others might say should be a 7 of 7, or 8 of 8 or any other x of x but still give the y less than x of x.

impposter 49 Reviews 42 reads
posted
69 / 71

My reply was to specifically address AnnaBankston's concern. But to elaborate:  
.
A 5 or 6 may mean Average or Nice Time but, to me, a 5-out-of-10 or 6-out-of-10 is worse than a 5-out-of-7 or 6-out-of-7.  Rephrasing, 6/10 might be Nice Time but FAR below the expected or hoped for 10. 6/7 is also a Nice Time but just a tad short of the NICEST 7-time I was expecting.  
.
Using %ages and grade school scoring, a 6/10 = 60% is below the passing grade of 65%. A 6/7 = 86% is at least a B or maybe even higher (B+ or A-).  (The system can't be %age only, because that doesn't tell the reader how difficult the test was: 10 max (harder test) or 7 max (easier test).

Posted By: 36363jensen
Re: X-out-of-Y Scoring is a 10-out-of-10 Suggestion
I think that approach solves some grading problems but I don't really see it applying here. There will still be reviewers that will write a review that many others might say should be a 7 of 7, or 8 of 8 or any other x of x but still give the y less than x of x.

36363jensen 4 Reviews 32 reads
posted
70 / 71

I do understand what you're saying, and basically do agree, but I think you missed the point I was making.  Yes, if the x score remains the same for the review while the review then shows what the session qualified for you could get that case of 6 out of 10 becoming the 6 out of 7 and it might imply a better session than one otherwise might have thought.  

 
My point was that you cannot be sure that the reviewers that are giving the 5 or 6 out of the default max of 10 here would keep giving that number if they explicitly had to consider the available max. I suspect a number would simply move their assessed grade down a bit so rather than given the 5-of-7 you put in your example they give a 4-of-7.  It's not clear to me that results in a more consistent alignment of narrative to numeric score across all reviews or that it appears as a better score than the 5 of 10 -- even if one does the quick conversion into a percentage to make is a clear apples-apples comparison.

 
I don't know who she is seeing but anyone who is just looking at the scores and making a choice on who to see I both lazy and probably making a lot of bad choices.  We all know that the profiles that have averages in the 9-10 range are highly suspect and need closer examination.  I'm not sure if the x out of y approach avoids that problem or not. (But again, I'm not trying to argue against the plan here, I would support that change. Just thinking through some of the other aspects in terms of what it solves and doesn't solve.)

impposter 49 Reviews 46 reads
posted
71 / 71

Thanks for commenting. That's how suggestions will be improved (or undermined and fall by the wayside). Over on S&P, there has been feedback and discussion over the years.  
.
I'll just add one more reason why I think it would be helpful, esp. to Providers.  
- Provider gets a 7. Feels slighted, insulted, annoyed, ... sometimes even *pressured* into changing her menu to do something she doesn't want to do just for an extra point or three.
.
- Provider gets a 7-out-of-7 (or any N-out-of-N) and realizes that it's the highest, most complimentary score and sends a message to guys reading her scores (even just scores ONLY, not the reviews) that her services are highly rated and she will not disappoint (whereas a 7-out-of-10 says that it wasn't as good as it could have been).
.
- Some clients will scan review scores and skip over anything less than a 9 or 10. Using X-out-of-Y, clients will scan review scores and look for N-out-of-N, (N-1)-out-of-N or even (N-2)-out-of-N and NOT skip over that Profile as long as they're OK with the max-N. (Don't want anal, don't want bi, don't want 2 guys, ... 7 or 8 Max is fine with me!)
.
Once again, thanks for chiming in.

Posted By: 36363jensen
... My point was that you cannot be sure that the reviewers that are giving the 5 or 6 out of the default max of 10 here would keep giving that number if they explicitly had to consider the available max.  
...
I don't know who she is seeing but anyone who is just looking at the scores and making a choice on who to see I both lazy and probably making a lot of bad choices.
...  
(But again, I'm not trying to argue against the plan here, I would support that change. Just thinking through some of the other aspects in terms of what it solves and doesn't solve.)

Register Now!