These ladies do not provide sex for money.  We are contributing donations to worthy causes and anything that happens sexually between the hobbyist and the charity provider is purely coincidental.  We can't help it if these female philanthropists are horny all the time.  Lets keep pitching in to help good causes and stop the prostitute references.  There is no sex supply for money here.  Just a lot of irresistable stud-muffins with disposable income to goodwill to fellow persons.

Re: I resent that implication

I don't pay for sex. I pay to spend quality time with a beautiful lady(or ladies, if I'm in the mood). If there happens to be chemistry and something intimate happens between two (or three)consenting adults, well hey, there's nothing wrong with that.

And as far as the reviews, they're fictional. You know how guys are. Always blowing things out of proportion. "Oh, after I gave her , her third O, I decided to pop" Pah-lease. I don't believe half of them.

Remember, play safe

Re: Provider #100,000

It's actually going to be the 100,000th database entry -- there's a difference.  There are numbers that got burned because people screwed up an entry, or because some guy didn't check to see if a provider was already listed before submitting a review, or some provider changed enough of her information that TER can't prove that the previous entry refers to her, so she gets a new entry.  It also includes massage-only providers, as well as ripoff listings.

If you run a review search with "Exclude Bad Websites", "Exclude Bad Phone Numbers", and "Sex:Yes", you get 19,654... which is still pretty cool, but not as impressive as the six-digit number.

I thought that reviews were just well written novels about sheer fantasy.