I'm getting an error from the ReviewGods saying the provider's website has an error. The problem is, the provider *doesn't* have a website. I put "http://none".
3. The lady being reviewed must have an advertisement on the web that includes her name and any one type of the following contact information: phone number, pager, email address or reservation form.
She may have had a site at one point. It could have been a CL, Eros or other escort mall ad that expired. In any event, a provider without a CURRENT link can not get reviewed
If This is true than why are there so many reviews getting posted where the web site is listed as "none". Drives me crazy that once you get the rules down up pops review that ahve slipped thru the system violating the rules? I understand when the profile says report new website, at least you know there was one there once.
I got the same problem when I tried to post a review for a provider that had an ad site but no personal site. It shouldn't have been rejected for giving one of two.
Wait until you spend all the time to write a reviw and then find out that provider is not allowed to be listed on TER.
I did that once and got that message which I thought was rather odd since it was her TER reviews that I read that caused me to go see her in the first place.
I pointd out her reviews and the came down a few days later.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
