Write Review
1,979,702 Total Reviews 3,352 New Reviews
8,667 Users Online

TER General Board

Perhaps they meant the old photo is no longer a real representation of the provider? eom
hobbyistsf 123 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

Tessen1179 reads

I saw this on a review and thought it was odd. I did a quick search out of curiosity and found it's actually quite common.

"Photo Real: NO" paired with "Photo Accurate: OLD"

huh? Does that mean that the reviewer managed to track down the actual girl in the photo and determined it to be an old photo of her? That's some dedicated investigating!

-tessen

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd290 reads

review under the influence:)

ReplyQuoteReport
mrfisher206 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
OSP177 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd131 reads

several did come to mind after I wrote it:)

ReplyQuoteReport
Smarty1101166 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
OSP136 reads

away from and out of my CRACK!!LOL

ReplyQuoteReport
mrfisher117 reads

doing something right with their life.

And that they choose to enlighten and entertain us with same is why I said "God love 'em."

ReplyQuoteReport
Claudius42310227 reads

I've seen one ad with an out of date picture of Christina Aguilera among the other stolen pics. Had I met the advertiser I'd likely have used the same descriptors. ;-)

ReplyQuoteReport
soflaguy44217 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
SinsOfTheFlesh130 reads

No, the reviewer was a savvy observer. He took note of teh horn rimmed glasses, bobby socks, and poodle skirt in the photo, and correctly surmised the photo had not been snapped in this decade :P

ReplyQuoteReport
hobbyistsf124 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!