TER's criteria for performance ratings equates "kissing with tongue" with "uncovered BJ" as factors that can raise a provider's performance score by one point. I'm curious if other guys agree with that. For me, whether a provider tongue kisses or not is NOWHERE NEAR as important as whether she provides a BBBJ. Agree or disagree?
It's much easier to find providers who give a good uncovered bj. Finding a girl who can really kiss, that's something rare and special. I'll take some passionate deep french kissing over anything.
For me DFK is better than BBBJ. It is equivalent to BBBJTC because it is rarely offered and increases the GFE factor. Often these two go hand in hand. I guess once the inhibition or "Only for SO" factor are lifted, it makes little difference for them.
The art of kissing is underrated. I'm not sure if I'm a good kisser, but I feel many providers come up short in that department. Not all ladies want to kiss, and I understand that. But I've found a wide disparity in the quality of kissing from those that do.
Maybe we should all practice more! LOL
tennislover
Disagree...
...but that's OK. You are looking for one thing, others are looking for other things. No big deal. Hell, some guys may rate a girl having red hair or no tattoos being the most important thing they are looking for. That's why they have details in addition to a simple 1 to 10 rating.
IMO it's impossible to rely solely on a number. I read not only the reviews of prospective girl , but also try to gauge how she 'stacks up' against other providers I know whom the same fellow has reviewed.
I spent a year with agency girls who offered only CBJ, one pop and only talk after my release and nary a kiss ! Little wonder why that agency NEVER mentioned the TER website????
and have gotten both passionate kisses and untranslated French in all my appointments, twice to completion in fact. I would feel awkard giving a lady a 9 or 10 on performance without both of these activites. Mi dos centavos. MfSD.