This came up on the DC board when someone asked about facial. One of the standard responses was that they should use the TER search.
This question primarily is about the 'finish' for BBBJ: no CIM, facial' spit or swallow. Of the four choices it is possible for a lady to offer any one or a combination of two or even three (YMMV).
A lady might not allow CIM but allow COF or COB, and swallow might be YMMV, etc.
It was my observation that many 'services' in a ladies profile are incomplete or inaccurate in this regard. The profile is set by the first reviewer and may not get updated by the lady - especially if she works for an agency. Also, IMO, some guys just lie about some services listed and in their reviews.
Ladies, do you make sure your profile accurately represents your services? I realise this might be more of an agency versus indie problem, and that responses here could be skewed by soliciting the ladies who actively post.
Guys, to what degree is this your experience - that the profile does not match the session or reviews?
As a way around this I once suggested being able to see the profile info associated with every review.
Thoughts?
but pissing off 10% of the gals you see is not an option.
Therefore, we must use our words and ask first before doing anything that involves such intimate contact.
when I posted my response to the facial query and mentioned about profile accuracy, I was PMed by a great local provider about my response.
So I figured it might be worth a chat here.
Obviously some parameters in a profile are more or less likely to be inaccurate. The problem for ladies would be that unmet expectations could affect ratings.
A search just gets you through the rough screening for your needs. A lady may change her performance over time & if you find an inaccuracy, you can file a problem report after the fact.
There is always some variance, even within a coupling on different sessions.
There is a fair amouont of work... & some decisions & possibly compromises in what we are seeking... to make a new selection. That's where the reviews come in. Once I have a rough list, I invest time reading several recent reviews for each prospect & making notations in the box provided in the TER Favorites page.
skb
to be inaccurate.
That's why I carefully read review *content*.
And I always submit "problem reports" if I receive services that are not listed on her profile, *unless* she states that the particular service or services are to be kept between us.
I review a lot of young agency girls, many of whom have zero to three or four reviews when I see them. I frequently note that the first reviewer had *no clue* when estimating her breast / cup size or making other statements about her appearance. I submit problem reports on these as well.....
I believe one of the issues is truly a case of YMMV. some of it maybe due to how the provider feels about you. It may also be based on how the provider feels at that time. I had one provider that had reviews that she doesn't allow DATY. When I saw her she advised me that she doesn't allow that, then when getting the bbbj I mentioned that I wish she would allow a 69, she was allowing touching. She apologized, and then a few moments later she asked me to saying she wanted it. Of course I will never be sure if it is truly YMMV as I suspect or a tactic of hers to make me feel special.
As in life, always assume you're getting played. Most ladies are YMMV until they get to know you and if they are impressed with you or like something about you during the first session, expect extras though she'll never likely tell you so. Most ladies don't want to belong to fuck club. They'd rather cultivate a few serious clients in the scheme of things, especially when the numbers align. For the career provider, this is not about quantity. Most of these ladies can get their sexual needs met elsewhere; they do this for money. For the few that combine the money/pleasure aspect, you'll find that if they like you and how you fuck, you get into the "special" group w/o additional admission or so is my experience.
is when you do a search with a specific thing in mind, and those providers come up, but reading ever review posted, not one time did it occur. Example - a provider in my area, her profile says greek. Now no where on her website, nor any reviews did this occur, and she has 20+ reviews. How can this be. Should this not be changed if certain services are not there.
Inquiring minds want to know....
IMHO, Greek often requires special preparation. One can not discuss in advance of a first meeting... so this might be arranged subsequently. Pretty naturally a lady might require objects not be over a size she is comfortable accomidating...
skb
Again, no where on her website does she even offer or mention it. This is what is puzzling, is that who ever set up the profile of her put it as yes she does. In her section on her website about what she offers, no where does it say greek, the islands, anything.
Everytime I get a review I look at my profile to make sure nothing has been changed..
So yes...I do keep up with mine and it is accurate..
I agree, reading the reviews is the best way to know. However, sometimes even if it says CIM the guy writing the review might prepare to go elsewhere and that is not in the review.
So you never know..
Makenzie
I know of no providers that don't offer CFS, but I rarely take advantage of that... just as some other clients in DC prefer a HJ finish to others.
The profiles are very often not accurate. I will almost always fill out a problem report of I see a gal and find that her services or appearance don't agree with the profile. LOL, one of the exceptions is if she does CIM with me. I have seen a few ladies regularly who do this with some guys and not with others. Heck, one only does it when she feels like it! For this reason I won't mention it in the review or update her profile.
The problem is services "advertised" and not provided. Not the other way around. If it isn't a consistent thing, then it shouldn't be on her profile.
Sometimes, I think the issue is more with some agency girls, and it may be a "marketing ploy" to some degree.
I say advertised in quotes, for the obvious reasons.
If you tell her you would like a snowball.
Well, I agree with you but I guess my point is that a lot of ladies, agency or otherwise, rarely check their profile or know how to have it updated. If a customer gets CIM and puts it in her profile well it's there whether she does it all the time or not...
For example, I recently saw a new gal who only does CBJ. Now, the first two or three guys to review her didn't bother to mention that or put it in her profile. My hunch is that, at her price point, these guys were used to only getting CBJ so it wasn't a big deal to them. Finally the third of fourth reviewer mentioned that it's only CBJ and that previous reviewers had neglected to mention this. CBJ is not a deal breaker for me and her reviews were very good so I saw her anyway. The bottom line is that the lady didn't even know about TER or her profile until after a few reviews had been written.
In a perfect world the ladies would keep a closer eye on their profile but, LOL, we don't live in or hobby in a perfect world!
I have never seen TER update a profile based on my review unless I give them a problem report. I do that anytime I confirm an error - as noted before, ruling out YMMV items first. Makes you wonder: why make us fill out the full profile every time if they're not going to check it?
Well, as I noted, it would be great if you could see the profile info provided for each review. You could weed out clients that don't use certain services or have certain biases. See if a ladies services changed over time...
Also, some services which have multiple options should allow all to be listed.
I almost think they need a text search and encourage folks to list standard acronyms which could then be searched.
I've wondered about this, too. If only the first reviewer's responses to all the "vitals" is used, it seems we get a very limited view of each provider, at least of those who are _not_ active on TER and keeping things accurate themselves.
One of my biggest concerns is the areas that are subjective, like breast appearance. The first guy gets to call it like he sees it, but...what if what he calls "droopy" looks "super nice" to me?
I agree that at least some of these data should go along with every review, particularly things that could change over time.
Here is my logic. I would prefer not take appointment if the only reason why someone contacted me is COF or something like that.
Some things are truly YMMV in good sence of this expression.
So I would rather deliver more than promised than promise more than delivered 
Lina
