Recently, I’ve read reviews which appear as having been written by AI.  I use it often, not for reviews, so I can discern the style.   I wish I kept the links to share and get views of others.  What concerns me is that AI makes easy to write fake reviews quickly.  In two cases I noticed that there were two reviewers who posted reviews about the same two providers over a short time period.  In any event, I wonder if you noticed an increase in fake reviews on TER.  

Some years ago I saw a review here of a girl I'd seen and reviewed on another site. When I read it, it was clear the person had cut and pasted MY review and presented it here as his own. I informed TER and the review was taken down and the handle was banned. Who knows how often that still happens today and it's probably easier than using AI.

There have always been fake reviews that I have noticed. I haven’t noticed an increase. In all likelihood, those willing to use AI are the same ones willing to previously write fake reviews without AI.

I do when I see my fake reviews. TER gives out free VIP days to write reviews. Fake reviews have always been an issue. I think there should be a verification process to ensure reviews are accurate. 🤷🏽‍♀️ I utilize all TER’s tools. Keeping up to date by reading your reviews is always important.

I’ve used AI after I’ve written the review to parse grammar and flow. Wish I had it in college 😂

I was just going to post a thread about this

I asked about this a month ago about provider I was considering seeing. Reviews seemed to mix up , "they and them " . It was hard to tell who the review was written by.

It's the other way around - an Ai review is far less likely to contain grammatical errors and might sound more formal and lack specific jargon.

What if the person using it, thinking something like ChatGPT, instructs it to make a few errors?

Why would a hobbyist write a fake review? It will not get the Escort to quickly jump his bones!!!! Any Hobbyists that does that to me.......will make me wanna question him a million times.

It's pretty obvious why. To get free VIP days.

Nothing is obvious to Kitty.

Yes, it's possible. But you'd have to be very specific as to what errors it has to make and then have them consistently replicated across all "reviews".

I doubt most people would go to the lengths of trying to create consistency. But you can probably pick a few words, like improper use of your, and have that as a repeated mistake in a review. Someone willing to put in the detective work likely will figure it out. But I’m not convinced most clients put in the necessary work to figure these things out. In fact, I think the average person is somewhat lazy about it and that’s why these things work. The average TER user isn’t even posting on the boards. Look how few of us there are compared to actual accounts. I would say most of us on the boards are doing more than the average user. I could be wrong. Just my hunch.

On a few occasions I have had well thought out legit reviews initially rejected with the instructions to describe  more specific details of our encounter.  I am fairly vanilla and consistent on my preferences and performances.   The last time this happened I waited 15 minutes and resubmitted my review and within 15 minutes it was approved.  Maybe AI was involved here as well.

I have spoken to several gentleman who have said they use AI to write reviews now because of the amount of “juicy” details required for posting.  Some don’t know how to write that sort of thing. I have also seen a few providers who are ranked very high in my area pre write reviews with AI, then have the client post the review before the session starts, and if they do not then the provider terminates the session.  This is why the top 100 is not really accurate anymore.  Forcing someone to write a review while you watch them or pre writing an AI rev for them to post seems unbelievably desperate.

Did you "see" this behavior because you were doing a duo with those high ranked providers in your area? If not you didn't see anything.

I think the message is getting lost playing telephone with Jemma, likely the providers offer a discount for the review and make the client post it when they first arrive. And then if they refuse in person, then they get kicked out. So the reviewers would have no incentive to report the behavior to TER because they would be outted/banned and no more discounted sessions with that provider.

Yes, if the clients are complicit in the fraud/rule violation then we get what we get. But with as many providers to see as there is, the large majority of which don't play that type of silly game from my experience, there really is not any justification for playing along.

I did “see” it yes, personally, and I no longer work with that individual in the area.  I also went to a provider mixer and witnessed it.  Bottom line is when reading them take into consideration it may not all be accurate or even written by a person.  They are there to verify a provider is legit, the juicy details will change from person to person

I have had several shy clients admit to using AI for the details part.  Some are uncomfortable writing things like that for some reason. The AI reviews I was referring to have seen, and yes I did see it, these were pre written using AI by the provider, then sent to the client to copy and paste. As far as the specific providers, outing them would do nothing but cause drama, so instead I removed myself from their work group and no longer associate.

Can't say I disagree with anything you wrote.