My last 4 reviews have been a horror....3 have been false and one was reduced from a 9 in service to an 8...

Bill x said my pussy was shaved...I have a bush...

Kraig NY was reduced from a 9 to an 8

whoroad said I was in a studio ...My apt is a 2 bedroom over 1000 ft

gentlemenmike said he saw me this month and I have not been seeing new clients at all.

I have gone through proper channels with problem reports and have been denied repeatedly.

I have been staying low profile lately as I am planning to return to school and have been busy w/ the application process...

TER has been a blessing and a curse for me....I need the boards and my reviews to survive but the drama and the bullshit has ruined my love of providing and I feel I need to create distance in order to continue doing what I love to do best...

It pains me that though I approach my calling with judicious integrity there are those who insist on whining to the moderators, creating fictions and generally behaving in a way that suits 15y/o boys...This is not my hobby, this is my livelihood....if I offend you, walk away.

I came to this lifestyle with a love of sex, please don't make me leave w/ a hatred towards men...

Thanks for letting me share,
MIKITHEMILF

Sorry things have gone sour for you Mikithemilf.  Any friend of Anneke's has to be a quality lady who deserves better.  If I ever got to NYC we would have met by know.  Good luck.

Nothing is sour...the world does not revolve around TER...I am the real deal and I am secure in that knowledge...I want to keep it real so we can all have fun...and that is the point, isn't it??

I love you too... but someone needs to speak the truth and when you got nothing you got nothing to lose...my sensibilities don't allow me to remain silent any longer...

-- Modified on 1/24/2007 4:18:46 PM

Not about a review, but about M---.  You were right; I was wrong.  

I've made three bad judgments in the hobby.  By far, that one was the most atrocious.

(Those who recognize the subject, please just PM me, don't post.)

It will turn around for you.  The numerical system on reviews-- sucks.  When an 8 feels like an insult though-- you're doing really good.  

Just in case something's reduced, though, it's better for the guy to say in the body of the review: "I think she deserves a 9, but by the rules she'll probably get an 8."  

For the other 3 reviews, fiction here ought to be based on fact, that goes without saying.  Pure fiction does nobody any good, and if you figure in the time writing the review, the extra VIP isn't worth it.  Even when it scores the lady high it only creates false expectations.    

I know of only one tryster who got a false review removed, and the only reason they knew it had to be false was he gave her a 9-9.  Fact checking otherwise is about impossible.  

Good luck in college, Miki.

Don't let the bastards wear you down.

You are much too fine for that.  

You are right to speak out, but don't let it get you down....your reputation is solid.  I would come see you if you said you were scheduling in the back seat of a car.

As always, what I write is purely fictional and intended solely for amusement and entertainment purposes only, any resemblance to characters either living or dead is purely coincidental... haveing said that.... What do we have?

For the most part we have what might loosly called a scattered collection of "fictional encounters"!  some take the fiction a bit further than others... What we do not have is someone verifying that
1) the described encounter took place..
2) the folks are who they say they are and finally
3) the events are as reported.  

Even with a GREAT review, seldom will two people experience the encounter the same.  Yes, this is your livelyhood... and yes I have had other providers tell me that they wish that the "boards" did not exist.  

Why? because they think that the "boards" have changed the hobby, and given "power" back to men and with that power comes the right to "demand" more and more from encounters. What did they mean by that?  As an example, lets take the phrase, "full, no rushed service" - does that mean that "the dude got an extra hour after paying for only 1 hour?" or does that mean, he got the full hour, and the lady never once looked at her watch?  My suspicion ?  that some ladies are pressured to provide significantly more than 1 hour, why? Simply to avoid someone writing that they were "rushed!"  

Anal?  while a lot are turned on, I have been with ladies who tell me I don't do anal... When I read that they do - and love it!  maybe they are not telling me the truth... but why would they even bring it up, when I don't even ask... and now?  the BareBack issues are afloat!

Well Kiddos!  Men do have the power! when the $ is in their hand.  The minute the $ is in another hand, the power point just got shifted.  I ALWAYS ASK if I sense that I did something that was not wanted.  and will try to abide by the wishes of my partner.  NOTHING pleases me more, than if I sense that the lady has an orgasm - it makes the encounter more real and personal for me... but know what?  After the $ changes hands... the power in the room - just shifted... But make no mistake about it, there are power plays " in the room"!  

Miki - as you know - and you know probably better than most - this is a public relatons gig - with or without the boards.  Some - for whatever reason - do treat this as a game.  For me? it is not a game - it is a substitute for what I lost - partly through my own stupidity - and partly through the bad habits and upbringing of another.  But for those that treat this as a game?  well, I guess there is no stopping them.  As for me?  I would prefer that the hobby become legalized.  Why?  oddly enough for the same exact reason I support Abortion Rights... a woman has the right to choose what happens to her own body... whether she feels that she can withstand the rigors of childbearing and birth - or whether it is the joy of sex.  Does not matter.  I am also for the right to die with dignity - men and women... So this all fits into a logical thought process.  With legalization come rights.  and one of the rights is to your reputation - as an entertainer.  And while some may like the out-of-control approach to comedy of Robin Williams... and others may prefer the much more paced approach of a Steven Wright (I went to a restaurant that serves "breakfast at any time". So I ordered French Toast during the Renaissance.)... That does not mean that one is better than another - it means that one is Robin Williams and one is Steven Wright.  But the each has a right to his own reputation.  As you have yours.

Again, these are the thoughts that have been expressed to me... and worth consideration when someone writes a review.  I have had a few encounters where I wrote a mediocre review... and I provided the justification.  Once under my "previous TER identity" I wrote of a provider "Sex like this, I got from my ex-wife"  The provider was upset and wrote to me... but what could I say, the way she acted, and treated me, made me feel cheap and really disgusting.  Not the experience I was seeking... and in reading the reviews of others - the only difference was i reflected the feelings in the scores as well as the written descriptions.  So, on the whole - I feel that I am fair - and I feel that most of the folks who do review are fair.  

Responsiblity?  When you see a fictitious review... report it.  As do I.  Complain... I do think that it helps... as it does help keep me in mind....  and while Staff would love to have a 100 % accurate board... I doubt that the resources exist to enforce that.  

And thanks.  Airing these issues from time to time will help the board get better.... but it will take time.

-- Modified on 1/24/2007 10:25:16 PM

The "mistake" over your incall being called a studio when you wish it called an apartment might have stemmed from your website calling it a studio.  Good Luck!

While the men may have the money...I stand proudly saying that I cannot trade $$$ for my integrity, I know the PR game better than most but if I need to compromise myself to make $$ I would rather be poor...ultimately in any endeavor all we have is our good name and to cheapen that would mean a loss of personal self respect, ultimately, for me , that cost is too great.

that if he had really been there, he would have noticed that a two bedroom is not a "studio"?

Well, it seems that others have noticed, since the review seems to be gone - and rightfuly so.

She's on to something here.  I say it gives the review away as false, then.  Especially when other reviews report that it isn't a studio.

Every provider should do something like it.  In fact, it would help for staff to keep things like that on file prior to reviews, as a hedge against fiction writing that's too-- imaginative.  

(Iago speaking to Othello)

"Who steals my purse steals trash, but he who fliches from me my good name, ruins me."

Seems you are psychically connected to the bard.

Sorry for your recent bad experience. Hope all your plans develop to you greatest expectations. MMMuuuaahhhh!. LOL&L, BC

you must be multi-orgasmic by now.

Those are some big words coming from such a small mind....

miki is a great lady, wild and passionate who loves men and her work.  Often the reviews can be skewed, but if you sift through them a hobbyist can find out a lot of information.  My experience with her was terrific.

being employed by you gals rather than edifying counter point.

Staff has rectified 3 out of the 4 mentioned reviews....I appreciate that and all the support out here and am glad I spoke up...There is a major difference between Drama for the sake of it and standing up for oneself...We all need to be our own champions.

Sardonic,

Please describe how exactly one is to offer an "edifying counter point" to a post that offers nothing more than a sophomoric attempt at an insult cloaked in humor? Furthermore, why should it be incumbent on "us gals" to rebut such a trite comment with intelligent discourse? Do tell please, where exactly is your intelligent discourse? Its markedy absent on this side of the computer monitor. Perhaps if you will exert yourself to contribute a post that at least bears a vague resemblance to intelligence, you will get a response in kind.

Just some food for thought

*edited for spelling

-- Modified on 1/25/2007 10:40:53 AM

when all that is offered is "sophomoric" epithets is a good recourse.

You also SOTF have chosen to attack ME rather than my muse.
Find contrary evidence to rebuke my original sentiment and worthy debate can continue, or be settled.

Actually, I didn't really attack you so much, as poke holes in your carefully constructed delusion. But, as you like it, so it shall be.

You ask for a debate, but so far the only thing you've managed to accomplish here is to contradict yourself. As I stated in my last post, what IS there to debate? Your response to Miki consisted of "her predilection for drama", what drama I ask? Have you provided any examples? No. What then, is there to debate? Furthermore, you attempt to connect that to.....multiple orgasms? What convoluted contortions did you go through in order to arrive at that conclusion? Furthermore, how silly to assume that we are all as caught up in our own delusions of grandeur as you are, so that we too might have made such a pitifully weak connection between drama and orgasms. So again I ask, where exactly is the debate in that?

One final point to ponder. I wonder if it might be possible for you to research the phrase argumentum ad hominem. While decrying it in your response to Miki, you are yourself guilty of it. Pot. Kettle. Black. I'm sure you get the picture.

PS I honestly don't want or expect you to cite examples to support your assertion that Miki has a "predilection for drama". For one thing, I'm not interested in seeing you attack her just so that you do not look so foolish after your first post. I merely made the point to highlight your abysmal debating skills and demonstrate to you what an actual discourse should look like. Perhaps the next time you go looking for a debate, you'll take this lesson into account so that you will actually show up armed for your battle of wits.

-- Modified on 1/25/2007 8:08:44 PM

I never entertain a war of words with an unarmed opponent. I consider it as morally reprehensible as intentionally giving wrong directions to a blind person.

Should we ever meet in a debate where a third party needn’t be exposed for sake of debate I’ll revel in the chance to pit ruthlessly laconic against your loquacious obfuscation.  
 

-- Modified on 1/26/2007 3:54:33 AM

A better concession speech never was written; Nor a better challenge. In each case, I accept.

it is strange.  If a woman (in ANY Profession) takes a stand - it is called "drama" - ANY man doing the exact same thing is "stong-willed" assertive etc....  So no, I have heard what you said, as I shared, from SEVERAL (not just a few) providers....   Gents, methinks that we should "ponder these points," very carefully!