crows feet, varicose veins, knobby kneed, dandruff, the list could go on and on.

If no one bothered to bring it up in their reviews then it can't be that much of problem.

along with the reviewers who refuse to make mention of that schitt in their reviews. i just saw of fucking hooker who had a goddamn baby pooch still on her gut. she stated it had been awhile since her last child SO a page and a half of fucking reviewers couldn't even be complete enough to make reference to that. YUCK!

When writing/researching reviews, this should definitely be a category. It's definitely a dealbreaker for a big enough percentage of us that this should be considered.

Any thoughts?

and not because it's unimportant, just that there are enough categories already and it can be included in the juicy details if you want to.  Besides, you'd need more than one category because if there are stretch marks it's important to say where they are.  On her stomach, her butt, her boobs? See what I mean?

If it bothers you, include it in your written review text.  But stretch marks change over time...  and there's often not a lot the girl can do to prevent or remove them.  
I have been with ladies who have stretch marks...  and surgery scars...  it doesn't bother me.  Maybe because I'm looking elsewhere!
j

No one wants a girl with thighs that look like cottage cheese curds.  Gross me out!

Generally denote prior pregnancy or birth.  Just an opinion.

I'm afraid you my dear are in the minority. The minority typically referred to as "The Shallow Boy's Club of America."

Stretch Marks are not a deal breaker for me...In my 10+ years of hobbying I have not seen a lot of them. If you "Date" women over 30 in the MILF category many of them have children and that is part of life....In fact the woman who is by far my favorite companion has birthing stretch marks and I could care less....I do not see her because she is a fantasy supermodel where I would expect a flawless body but perhaps less substance...I spend time with her because the life experiences (including childbirth) make her who she is an it works for me.

I would undertand if you were looking for the supermodel figure (in the 10+ range) and were suprised by any perceived flaw that was not evident in her photos....If that is what I was inventing my hard earned money in I would be disappointed also. With all the potential body "flaws" available I don't know if stretch marks are all that prominent.

Personally I have been far more disappointed by the Body of a 10 and the Face of a 6.....that is a deal breaker for me. I would like to see the Appearance score split between Face and Body.

As always just my $0.02 worth.

like us hobbyist.

" It's definitely a dealbreaker for a big enough percentage of us that this should be considered "

How do you know that's true ?  

To each their own and it's your dollar , but looking at all your 2's and 3's makes me wonder if your standards might be a bit too high ? I'd take stretch marks over a bad attitude, mannequin anyday of the week.      

LOL flawless like us hobbyist HAHA

The Hobbyists are not flawless! Not every Hobbyist has that perfect 10 figure either like what a lot of providers would prefer. I see Hobbyists who are overweight, not the best dressed, sometimes attitudes are horrible, face not inviting.... etc. The list could go on. All I can really say is you get what you pay for; for the hobbyists. If a girl is charging real cheap prices she isn't going to have a cindy crawford figure or face. Now if you're paying top prices I would expect the girl to be a perfect 10 in every way shape and form. If you're not asking the provider if she has stretch marks prior to your appt. then you really don't have any room to complain about it on here either. NOw if you do ask the provider and she misleads you then complain.

-- Modified on 10/26/2011 1:28:20 PM

What is the percentage anyhow?  Looking at the responses it cant be very high.  

Stretch marks are not a deal breaker at all with me.  Its whats going on between the ears.  Mechanical  now there is a deal breaker.

I agree putting me under a microscope when those usually doing so dont measure up seems a bit BS...and I think it is. But at the same time each to their own.
hes entitled to his preferences. He should maybe see the 20yr olds before stretchmarks and kids.
No they arent as much fun but he needs the looks to get off I guess.
Its all about variety...

Have SOME stretchmarks somewhere. They don't mean that she's fat or has had a child, and often they are barely visible. Moreover, stretchmarks are often genetic, and I don't believe it's right to penalize a provider or detract from her potential client pool by revealing she might have a few stretchmarks.

Unless a provider advertises herself as a MODel or as a flawless beauty, she should be allowed to have some womanly attributes beside secondary sex characteristics, such as a couple stretchmarks, a dimple of cellulite on her thighs, or a spider vein or two.

Perhaps your own standards of beauty should be examined...  we are flesh and blood, not photoshopped perfection. I do not believe that a couple flaws lessen a woman's beauty, or more importantly, her ability to be a sexual dynamo.

I also feel saggy ones should also fall under the same thing.

I get so sad, when you guys are doing me doggy and I look at myself in the mirror!  I think to myself, "good god, how is this guy ever going to get off, when I have a few hidious stretch marks, much less this bruise on my leg?  Oh, and this hair that fell out of place!  Jeepers, I can see a blemish on my chin!  I hope he doesn't notice my scar!  I should give him his money back!  He should write me a review and put me in the rip off section!"

I'm sorry, I'm not as attractive as the hobbyist!

Feeling like I'm a 1 on the scale of 1 to 10,
Laina

P.s.  At least I have a sparkling personality!

If you do not mind the stem where you inflate them.  Lol

To some extent, it depends on the age of the provider and how she sells herself. If she advertises as a MILF or courtesan, you gotta think there may be a few stretch marks. If she advertises as a 20 year old spinner, not so much. If said marks are very noticeable, or out of proportion to her body type, they should be mentioned in the reviews. Just my thoughts.

It reminds me of Lars and the Real Girl!  Such a great movie!

If you want to fuck a provider with no streatch marks try a blow up doll like the one below
No stretch marks and even better because you can save your dough. But be sure to blow her up all the way after each use otherwise just like any other woman she will have stretch marks, so make sure you give her enough air! wouldn't want it to be a dealbreaker for when you pull her out for the next go around or have you writing the manufacture leaving them bad reviews!

Since you are looking for Superwoman anyway!
Next time you try to book me, I'll respectfully decline with the comment: "I have some hideous stretchmarks, trust me you don't want to see this!!!"
I'm sure you look like Brad Pitt yourself, it just wouldn't be fair...
If you do, you are the exception, since the average hobbyist I used to see (at my average rate and popularity) was:
-about a 2 on a scale of 1 to 10
-balding
-with a hairy back, shoulders, nose, ear, and everything but his palm
-has less than perfect hygiene and needed to be reminded to shower and use mouthwash
-had a d*ck size that if I was not a pro, I would have laughed at while gathering my clothes from the floor and running all the way home...
And the list goes on and on. Stretchmarks were the least of the faults of you and the like.
I never cared about looks, it's just p4p, but the attitude bothers me! If you hate women so much that you find fault in everything, why do you see us? The girls before me were right! You should stick to that blowup doll!

This is not to say there are no good hobbyists, who actually like women. (Not you, obviously...)  When I decided to offer longer appointments and advertise in places where the environment was not so hateful, where the guys actually wanted to meet women, as opposed to you, woman-haters, who do nothing but bash us all day long, magic! The quality instantly improved! I no longer have to see people like you and they don't comment on my stretch marks either! They instead take me to dinner, talk to me, treat me like a human being! In return, I often extend our 4 hour date to 5 or 6 hours and we are both very happy in the end. (Of course with you that would be torture: another hour of having to look at my stretchmarks! Gross, right? LMFAO!) Anyway, I recommend the blowup dolls or a good, hard look in the mirror!

Toodles!

From your post, Prowith Stretchmarrks, we must have met, but I don't remember you.

Seriously, if it bothers someone, they can put it in a review.  If the OP must know, he can try PM'ing previous reviewers like you would about any factor imprtant to you that you thought might not be included in a profile or in a prior review.

Respectfully, to the angry lady.  There are a variety of reasons for the direction in which the envelope goes.  Appearance is often one of them.  Also, for good or bad, not every hobbyist is interested in treating you like a real person.  And no, stretch marks don't bother me. (We can compare them!) Neither do real people. But can you get me the phone number for the blowup doll to your left?

Posted By: ProWithStretchmarks

Since you are looking for Superwoman anyway!
Next time you try to book me, I'll respectfully decline with the comment: "I have some hideous stretchmarks, trust me you don't want to see this!!!"
I'm sure you look like Brad Pitt yourself, it just wouldn't be fair...
If you do, you are the exception, since the average hobbyist I used to see (at my average rate and popularity) was:
-about a 2 on a scale of 1 to 10
-balding
-with a hairy back, shoulders, nose, ear, and everything but his palm
-has less than perfect hygiene and needed to be reminded to shower and use mouthwash
-had a d*ck size that if I was not a pro, I would have laughed at while gathering my clothes from the floor and running all the way home...
And the list goes on and on. Stretchmarks were the least of the faults of you and the like.
I never cared about looks, it's just p4p, but the attitude bothers me! If you hate women so much that you find fault in everything, why do you see us? The girls before me were right! You should stick to that blowup doll!

This is not to say there are no good hobbyists, who actually like women. (Not you, obviously...)  When I decided to offer longer appointments and advertise in places where the environment was not so hateful, where the guys actually wanted to meet women, as opposed to you, woman-haters, who do nothing but bash us all day long, magic! The quality instantly improved! I no longer have to see people like you and they don't comment on my stretch marks either! They instead take me to dinner, talk to me, treat me like a human being! In return, I often extend our 4 hour date to 5 or 6 hours and we are both very happy in the end. (Of course with you that would be torture: another hour of having to look at my stretchmarks! Gross, right? LMFAO!) Anyway, I recommend the blowup dolls or a good, hard look in the mirror!

Toodles!

On the 'kindler, gentler' board you almost sound like a ruffian.

almost


HH

I think that is evident by your extensive review history of low scores.

 But, if you don't like stretch marks then... you don't like stretch mark! Well, they are evertwhere so I guess it sucks to be you!

Nothin' personal! Bro-hugs!


HH

that your view is the typical one. OP has a preference, that is not problem. He states its to discuss it. Some men will be similar, some won't.

You don't have one iota of evidence to back your assertion about other mens' views. To speak as though you do is the moronic part.

By the way, you are jacking off to porn to often.


HH

I think that is being unrealistic. If it is a real problem for an individual they can comment about it in their review.

I personally, think stretch marks (or other conditions that are part of living) should be appreciated, as part of the lady's authentic beauty.

And a lot of external beauty too!!!

I don't think it needs to be a check off category. Just too much information, it could go on forever if you start putting every little thing on the list. It doesn't matter to me.

It may matter to you and while it's true that reviews are to help others know about the provider and to make an informed choice, the reviewer can't read your mind and know what to tell you in the review. I wouldn't put "she had stretch marks" in a review I wrote if the lady had any because I wouldn't care. Generally the things that guys put in reviews are what matters to them. They may put some things that they are aware others are interested in but trying to cover everything isn't possible.

As always there is someone for everyone here. Do your research, back channel and see ladies that meet your criteria.

Be careful what you ask for, as they say….most of my thoughts aside…

Contemporary popular media continues to do an incredibly bang-up job of creating completely unrealistic expectations of the “perfect” woman; which, of course do not include stretch marks.

But. Here in reality land (all fantasies aside), providers don’t airbrush over every imperfection in skin tone before you walk in the door. And, many women have stretch marks. Even  spectacularly (physically) beautiful women can have stretch marks.  

What about a mole? A freckle in a place you don’t like? What about tan lines? A scar? A split nail? An errant hair?.....

Yes. You’re paying. But, you’re still paying an actual human. And humans have imperfections. And shit happens. And we all figure out how to live with it somehow.

If this is “definitely a deal breaker” for you?  My thought is you’re shitouttaluck…unless…as a few others have suggested, you buy yourself an inflatable latex version .Then again, you could always re-examine your unrealistic expectation…(yeah…..I know….that would be my unrealistic expectation)

BTW, Harlowe, I don't remember any of those flaws on you. I think if women can tolerate the flaws in men, men can do likewise with women. Besides, a beautiful woman with a wretched personality is absolutely no fun at all. Imperfection can be beautiful.

Ha, ha, ha!  Looks like his 10, performed like these flawless ladies!   Ha, ha, ha!  I love that!  

Believing in the "law of attraction" now,
Laina

Thank you Tufu.  I wasn't speaking about myself, but it's kind of you to say so. Thankfully I don't have stretchmarks, but you don't get an ass like this without a smidge of cellulite!! :P IMO it's worth the trade-off.

Sweetie I am 23 and a lot of fun

But I am irritated by this hateful attitude that the boards have been displaying lately. Stretch marks do not bother me at all . If a lady has stretch marks that are noticeable and she is still confident enough with her body to get naked and make my kitty quiver I am more than impressed with her confidence. Confidence is sexy and it masks all her flaws. Maybe you guys need to rent the movie "Real women have curves" & educate yourselves

You guys are doing a great job with your spiteful and mean attitudes. Pretty soon you guys will have chased away all the women that used to be active posters on the boards.

Keep it up & you will get your cockfest

you may be fun now,but it only stands to reason like everything else we all become a lil more refined,
a bit more defined and better at things having life experiences longer.

so you seem to disagree that in 10yrs you are not going to be better at socialization communication take things differently.
If nothing else practice makes perfect, time will refine you in many ways.
and in 10yrs you'll agree with me I am certain of that.

Oh well, just a thought. Happy hobbying to all.

and I am pretty god damned happy with my sex life.

No bro hugs please, fisher and MP67 might get ideas.lol

and I would love to fuck her the way she looks RIGHT NOW, I have no idea if I would be half as interested in the the way she'll look in ten years, or even less likely in twenty years when she is your age. Or thirty years when she will be the age I am now.

Lets face it, most women are a lot hotter in their twenties than in their forties. and I suppose the same goes for guys, but considering I don't mind paying to spend time with women thirty years younger than me, it all works just fine for me, and them I hope.

I see where you're coming from, Harlowe; I agree that a lot of people in our society need to re-examine their standards of beauty and their commercial-induced expectations of perfection.  And I definitely don't think "stretchmarks" should be a review category like the OP suggested.

However, I think it's important to keep in mind, we all have our little turn-ons and turn-offs.  And in most cases, it's not a voluntary thing.  Personally, I don't mind stretch marks at all.  But if I did, and I was considering seeing a provider, I would certainly appreciate a prior reviewer at least mentioning it briefly.  Going in not knowing, and then having a bad time because of that, does no favors for either the client or the provider.

This doesn't just go for stereotypical "flaws" --really, anything about a provider, could be either a real positive, or a negative, or neither, depending on my personal preferences and kinks.

Being as descriptive as possible in reviews helps everyone.  Many hobbyists are wise enough to know that photoshopped perfection is, indeed, photoshopped; and that a provider having a few of what some consider "flaws" isn't necessarily a dealbreaker.  And for the few hobbyists that don't understand that, again, it's better that they get that info up front and avoid an awkward situation on both sides.  It's their loss, really.

I get it, you disagree with a post.  You choose to use "moronic" because, I have no reason why any poster uses such descriptives, they don't appear to me to contribute to the dialog.  Now, is the next "point" that anyone who uses an alias is an "assclown", or just one particular poster or pair of posters, in which case why attack their use of the TER-provided alias function?  All kinds of reasons why an alias might be preferred.  Entirely your own business why you felt using "moronic" and "assclown" in the same post was a civil contribution to a public discussion board where theoretically there should be fun and comradery considering the shared interest/activity/hobby at the heart of this board.  Also not sure why you choose to attack the views of others on how to deal with stretchmarks in a review when I don't see any reviews posted by HalfHour.

ASSCLOWN ALERT!

No you don't have to use an alias, you just have to say something that is so dumb, which everyone in the room knows is dumb (but you) and you have to stick to that dumbness like stink on shit qualify for a ASSCLOWN ALERT.

A non-alias example of that might be "I don't see any reviews posted by HalfHour."

That's like pointing out something that's both soooo completly obvious, yet sooo totally meaningless, like... "HEY! HEY! Our President is a black man! A black man!" LOL!

Don't be a total marooon, logan!

Bro-hugs!


HH