
The "always does such and such and such" often sets off a downer. We've never met IRL, let alone had a session (maybe my loss, maybe yours, who can say), but in general I react poorly, perhaps disgracefully, when presented with the approach of a pat routine. I know that tailoring each encounter to the whims of each customer can be a mind-boggling drag in any form of entertainment, and that's not really the best alternative anyway. Too much forethought.
But once two people meet, the interaction (for the client) is a neve-been-never-will-be-again moment in what is probably an otherwise drab existence. So...wouldn't it be nice if the lady he chose from the hundreds that made themselves available to him in his geographical area would simply put aside the well rehearsed sequence of erotic numbers she "usually" offers up and-- I don't know-- just wing it? Why THINK about what you're going to do? Why not just do what the moment suggests? Granted, the moment might suggest that you kick the bum out on his ass, but Beauty Demands Risk, so the poor fool ought to be ready to accept that possibility. OTOH, something outlandishly magical might ensue, something far more erotic and unique than anything either of you could have planned. The problem with TALKING about it here on the board is that this TALKING already robs the encounter of its spontaneity. Talking about it as an prologue to the session is even worse. There is already too much planning involved: set time, set place, set monetary exchange, set menu boundaries... At least the interaction itself might skate along the edge of the unknown. Some women get this right off. Some could complete a six-year advanced degree in Sexual Improv and still not master it. Okay, a first rendezvous poses a risk of another kind to a provider, so she might be reluctant to abandon control to the trust and commitment of just reacting to a stranger's dynamics, but still... Asking you to look at the word ALWAYS a second time. That's all.I am curious to hear the range of responses to this question and see whether the answers cluster around a specific score or not. So here's the background:
While each guy's ejaculate tastes a bit different (presumably), when considering your total experience of sucking a guy off and having tasted a number of samples, how would you rate overall the taste of the creamy stuff on a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is just awful and perhaps the worst tasting thing you have ever had in your mouth; a 10 is delicious and would be described as ambrosia (food of the gods) versus a 5 which is pretty neutral (not bad tasting, but not good tasting, easily swallowable, but not something you would seek our to taste).
For those who currently allow CIM, those that don't (but have had the experience) how would you rate it overall?
There will be a followup question for the guys with regard to the taste of a woman's coochie...only fair!
Many of the gals I know well don't do CIM...and those that allow it tolerate it. They have all told me that if it tasted like strawberries and cream they'd suck it all fucking day.
And of course you have a few die hard's here that have been told to eat pineapple shit...and they claim to do so to appease a hooker. But the gals who are honest here refute that nonsense.
Can we ask who shit's rainbows next?
sea urchin. I almost lost my lunch & my mind when I tried my first sea urchin. No one understands unless they have tried it. One of the world's worst "foods".
It's definitely better than sea urchin!
They probably think it tastes like Benjies.
-- Modified on 6/2/2014 5:11:48 PM
Taste if not swallow. EVERY single one says the same thing. It ALWAYS tastes sweet. Imagine that.
While each guy's ejaculate tastes a bit different (presumably), when considering your total experience of sucking a guy off and having tasted a number of samples, how would you rate overall the taste of the creamy stuff on a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 is just awful and perhaps the worst tasting thing you have ever had in your mouth; a 10 is delicious and would be described as ambrosia (food of the gods) versus a 5 which is pretty neutral (not bad tasting, but not good tasting, easily swallowable, but not something you would seek our to taste).
For those who currently allow CIM, those that don't (but have had the experience) how would you rate it overall?
There will be a followup question for the guys with regard to the taste of a woman's coochie...only fair!
go in for the "lap up", "oh that tasted so good I want the "post cum", too". Damn! what a feeling after an awesome orgasm.
I really wish I felt otherwise. And CPA is right, no amount of pineapple makes any difference.
...and finds the taste of his own cum "acceptable."
they get on their knees and lay their head back, open mouth, tongue waiting for it.......only had that once
You're not seeing the 'right ladies' lol
Those are the Catholic ladies. They learn that at their First Communion. Also when they're taught to swallow without chewing.
I try to avoid coffee, eat lots of fruit and drink a lot of water throughout the day! Recently had a multiple CIM session, so I guess the first taste wasn't that bad! Maybe THAT is why she called me Sweetie! :
Cum is cool and all, but it's like booze. You don't drink it for the taste.