but I was just browsing around  CL "women for men" posts, and I see a young girl looking...

says she is 5'6", 230# (not quite a bbw) - her words.

Or the lady I met recently who is very pretty, and nice, and sweet - and her belly is bigger than her 36dd chest, it's bigger than my belly, and she calls herself a "small bbw".

Can we get some kind of standard here? I happen to be attracted to busty, curvy ladies, but I would still like an accurate representation of what I am going to be paying for. OK, here's my scale, everyone please copy it down and carry it with them at all times :

1. emaciated: bones pressing through skin, pop eyes, no muscle tone in legs. Diseased.
2. scrawny: no breasts, bony hips, spindly legs. Frightening.
3. skinny: very little body fat. rudimentary breasts. Hot to men who like young boys.
4. thin: small waist, 24" or less. Breasts B cup or smaller, hips no wider than 34". Nice, spinner.
5. slim: up to 26" waist, up to C cup breasts, up to 36" hips. Hot.
6. average: up to 28" waist, up to D cup, up to 38" hips. still Hot.
7. curvy: Bigger difference between breasts/ hips and waist. waist up to 30", breasts MIN D cup. still Hot.
8. voluptuous: Big everything: min D cup, waist 28-34, hips 36-40. Hot if you are a Rubens fan.
9. thick: Big everything, but smaller difference between breasts/hips and waist. You must be into large women to enjoy her.
10. BBW: Large belly. Hips wider than 42". May or may not have large breasts, but chest is 40"+. Only for the fans.
11. Obese: #9 and #10 may technically (medically) qualify as obese, which I believe is only 25% above your "ideal" body weight? But ladies in category #11 are pretty rare in this venue, I've only seen them in calendars and some niche porn flicks. You have to be a REAL fan.

So anyway some of this may be insulting, IDN, and I hate people who insult others for their size, so I offer humble apologies. Personally, I would fall into the male equivalent of between 8 and 9, I suppose, and I am strongly attracted to women from 5 - 8, 4 if she is very beautiful, 9 and maybe 10 if she has a pretty face and nice breasts.

Thanks for the breakdown Clarence...entertaining as always. Having my morning coffee with my TER fix from a balcony on Panama City Beach!!! See you guys Monday!!!

That's another problem when you use the word petite just for height.  Petite to me is thin/skinny and short like 5'1 to 5'4.  For example, a petite women would be 5'3 and 105-110.   Now that my type of women. London said she is petite but she is more like 5'3 to 5'5 and 130lb.  That's thick to me.  NOT my type at all.  I want to beach Barbie doll look.  We are all different and have different taste

If the pics are what you are looking for..that should be enough.

If the pics are fake and she looks like she ate the gal in the fake pic...walk out.  And then report the fraud on your local board.

Honestly I haven't run into the fake pics very often.  There's been a few that had 10+ year old pics...and I let my pals know after that debacle.  But that was less a body type issue than meeting a Grandma type when I was expecting her daughter  

I pick based on a body type...and trust that the hooker is fairly representing herself in a picture.

Just curious...how is 5'6" 230# NOT a fatty?  Seems like she could be a starting nose tackle!!

Posted By: clarence37

but I was just browsing around  CL "women for men" posts, and I see a young girl looking...

says she is 5'6", 230# (not quite a bbw) - her words.

Or the lady I met recently who is very pretty, and nice, and sweet - and her belly is bigger than her 36dd chest, it's bigger than my belly, and she calls herself a "small bbw".

Can we get some kind of standard here? I happen to be attracted to busty, curvy ladies, but I would still like an accurate representation of what I am going to be paying for. OK, here's my scale, everyone please copy it down and carry it with them at all times :

1. emaciated: bones pressing through skin, pop eyes, no muscle tone in legs. Diseased.
2. scrawny: no breasts, bony hips, spindly legs. Frightening.
3. skinny: very little body fat. rudimentary breasts. Hot to men who like young boys.
4. thin: small waist, 24" or less. Breasts B cup or smaller, hips no wider than 34". Nice, spinner.
5. slim: up to 26" waist, up to C cup breasts, up to 36" hips. Hot.
6. average: up to 28" waist, up to D cup, up to 38" hips. still Hot.
7. curvy: Bigger difference between breasts/ hips and waist. waist up to 30", breasts MIN D cup. still Hot.
8. voluptuous: Big everything: min D cup, waist 28-34, hips 36-40. Hot if you are a Rubens fan.
9. thick: Big everything, but smaller difference between breasts/hips and waist. You must be into large women to enjoy her.
10. BBW: Large belly. Hips wider than 42". May or may not have large breasts, but chest is 40"+. Only for the fans.
11. Obese: #9 and #10 may technically (medically) qualify as obese, which I believe is only 25% above your "ideal" body weight? But ladies in category #11 are pretty rare in this venue, I've only seen them in calendars and some niche porn flicks. You have to be a REAL fan.

So anyway some of this may be insulting, IDN, and I hate people who insult others for their size, so I offer humble apologies. Personally, I would fall into the male equivalent of between 8 and 9, I suppose, and I am strongly attracted to women from 5 - 8, 4 if she is very beautiful, 9 and maybe 10 if she has a pretty face and nice breasts.

No honey, I am not 130 lbs thanks..more like 115 and yes I am only like 5 ft. 3 if that. If you think that is thick, you're high.  Spinner and petite are also not the same things...that is probably more of what you're looking for. You want more of a spinner with no tits and ass, who is also short.

As for types, yes I agree...personally, I go for men who can read, write, and spell properly.


-- Modified on 11/2/2012 11:26:00 AM

These days, the "average" woman is a sz 12-14 and most women in the US population are within this range.  I have seen women within this range and it's amazing how different they each look; some still look hot while others look frumpy.  I think proportion is important and of course having a very pretty face and personality ties ANY body type into a nice package. If you like what you see, don't worry about the stats or specifics.  If she looks good she looks good--enjoy her!  Different strokes for different folks.  Personally I am not attracted to skinny women (modern day models) Meat is for the man and bones are for the dog   I am turned off by huge women but somewhere in between usually gets me going...I could call it "thick" or "voluptuous"  but whatever....each woman will wear it differently as long as she carries herself well it's all good.  BTW, whoever called London thick needs glasses! Not that there is anything at all wrong with thick but you have your ideals all wrong!

Posted By: clarence37

but I was just browsing around  CL "women for men" posts, and I see a young girl looking...

says she is 5'6", 230# (not quite a bbw) - her words.

Or the lady I met recently who is very pretty, and nice, and sweet - and her belly is bigger than her 36dd chest, it's bigger than my belly, and she calls herself a "small bbw".

Can we get some kind of standard here? I happen to be attracted to busty, curvy ladies, but I would still like an accurate representation of what I am going to be paying for. OK, here's my scale, everyone please copy it down and carry it with them at all times :

1. emaciated: bones pressing through skin, pop eyes, no muscle tone in legs. Diseased.
2. scrawny: no breasts, bony hips, spindly legs. Frightening.
3. skinny: very little body fat. rudimentary breasts. Hot to men who like young boys.
4. thin: small waist, 24" or less. Breasts B cup or smaller, hips no wider than 34". Nice, spinner.
5. slim: up to 26" waist, up to C cup breasts, up to 36" hips. Hot.
6. average: up to 28" waist, up to D cup, up to 38" hips. still Hot.
7. curvy: Bigger difference between breasts/ hips and waist. waist up to 30", breasts MIN D cup. still Hot.
8. voluptuous: Big everything: min D cup, waist 28-34, hips 36-40. Hot if you are a Rubens fan.
9. thick: Big everything, but smaller difference between breasts/hips and waist. You must be into large women to enjoy her.
10. BBW: Large belly. Hips wider than 42". May or may not have large breasts, but chest is 40"+. Only for the fans.
11. Obese: #9 and #10 may technically (medically) qualify as obese, which I believe is only 25% above your "ideal" body weight? But ladies in category #11 are pretty rare in this venue, I've only seen them in calendars and some niche porn flicks. You have to be a REAL fan.

So anyway some of this may be insulting, IDN, and I hate people who insult others for their size, so I offer humble apologies. Personally, I would fall into the male equivalent of between 8 and 9, I suppose, and I am strongly attracted to women from 5 - 8, 4 if she is very beautiful, 9 and maybe 10 if she has a pretty face and nice breasts.

London..  I'm not going to play your games, however, I have seen your pictures and YES you are not my type !  Too thick and not the S. Ca look that I'm in search of.

If you like fat chicks !!  ;  

if you can verify her height and weight you can come up with her BMI. Then we could get TER to include BMI on all profiles. Of course some hobbyists would probably want to bring scales and tape measures to verify height and weight.

I would beat the piss out of you.

Anorexic is not attractive, but when you have a thing for 12 year olds like this clown does, well you get the point. At 130 lbs, he is correct...I would be thick. At 115 my body is perfectly proportioned. The guy is an idiot plain and simple. Calling a girl fat is the best he can do because he is more than a criminal as was noted in past threads. An illiterate, moronic criminal at that ha ha. I don't get all butt hurt when some pervert calls me fat...MEN like me just fine lol. Men who don't secretly wish they were fkin 12 year olds that is. If you can find one roll, one stretch mark, or one ounce of cellulite on my body without photoshop, he might have a point but alas...just another jackass who lost an argument and had a hooker hand him his whiney, overgrown ass.

-- Modified on 11/2/2012 12:49:26 PM

I Guess because she has a brain and tits makes her a fat chick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Here's one that doesn't fit on the charts.

(No, not Liz Warren, just skip the ad, OK?)

I have belly ("large" depends on who you ask but lol I have enough) but you make clearly make out the difference in by boobs from my abdomen from my hips/waist I have shape and am not one odd-shaped mass, my hips area is right at 42'', my chest is 40+ (44DD maybe bigger I need a re-sizing lol), at 5'5'' about 180-ish lbs pretty sure that puts me in 11 too.  

I sort of cover about 3 of these so um yeah.
.... what's the point of this again?

Posted By: clarence37

but I was just browsing around  CL "women for men" posts, and I see a young girl looking...

says she is 5'6", 230# (not quite a bbw) - her words.

Or the lady I met recently who is very pretty, and nice, and sweet - and her belly is bigger than her 36dd chest, it's bigger than my belly, and she calls herself a "small bbw".

Can we get some kind of standard here? I happen to be attracted to busty, curvy ladies, but I would still like an accurate representation of what I am going to be paying for. OK, here's my scale, everyone please copy it down and carry it with them at all times :

1. emaciated: bones pressing through skin, pop eyes, no muscle tone in legs. Diseased.
2. scrawny: no breasts, bony hips, spindly legs. Frightening.
3. skinny: very little body fat. rudimentary breasts. Hot to men who like young boys.
4. thin: small waist, 24" or less. Breasts B cup or smaller, hips no wider than 34". Nice, spinner.
5. slim: up to 26" waist, up to C cup breasts, up to 36" hips. Hot.
6. average: up to 28" waist, up to D cup, up to 38" hips. still Hot.
7. curvy: Bigger difference between breasts/ hips and waist. waist up to 30", breasts MIN D cup. still Hot.
8. voluptuous: Big everything: min D cup, waist 28-34, hips 36-40. Hot if you are a Rubens fan.
9. thick: Big everything, but smaller difference between breasts/hips and waist. You must be into large women to enjoy her.
10. BBW: Large belly. Hips wider than 42". May or may not have large breasts, but chest is 40"+. Only for the fans.
11. Obese: #9 and #10 may technically (medically) qualify as obese, which I believe is only 25% above your "ideal" body weight? But ladies in category #11 are pretty rare in this venue, I've only seen them in calendars and some niche porn flicks. You have to be a REAL fan.

So anyway some of this may be insulting, IDN, and I hate people who insult others for their size, so I offer humble apologies. Personally, I would fall into the male equivalent of between 8 and 9, I suppose, and I am strongly attracted to women from 5 - 8, 4 if she is very beautiful, 9 and maybe 10 if she has a pretty face and nice breasts.

I'm 6 ft even about 215 lbs. and play hockey 5-7 times a week but according to this crazy scale I'm just shy of being obease.  Wonder how much funding the guy that developed this measure got from all of us to come up with sh.. like this.

London don't try to justify your looks honey.  It is what it is....you are no young pup.  Here you go getting angry again. You should watch the way to talk on these boards you might scare potential clients away.  Just some food for thought.  No pin intended. ;  . Love you. Kisses

I'm talking about women dumb ass.  You must like manly women then.   I'm also 6'1 and 195 very lean, muscular, tan toned and have abs to show.  And I might add I'm good looking.  I pay providers to leave me after I fuck.  No text, phone calls, and drama.  A lot of you guy pay because you are fat fucks, old and have small dicks.   Peace.

I'm 6', 195 to 200 and I ride my bike 70 to 175 miles per week yet I'm borderline obese. I was in my doctors office a few months back and my "ideal" weight is 165 or so. I'd look like I got out ouf a concentration camp at that weight. Those BMI charts are a joke.

Mocha-  I'm sure you have plenty of men that love you and love to fuck you.   It's just not my taste.   I'm sure you don't like in shape white boys either.  Perhaps you do....your just not my type and that's ok.  My point is...  If I'm going to pay a women to leave I'm going to get what I want.   Does everyone get that. It's NOT rocket science boys and girls.  Come on.  Get off the crack.

London-  you have no idea who I am.  It's really funny you say that because you would never guess in a million years what I do for a living.  Wow.    Talk about a dumbass.  Wow

that is why you have to ignore the terminology to an extent and just do your research when these things really matter to you. there is a lot of contradiction in your own terminology as well. for instance the words "spinner" and "petite" both indicate a woman who is shorter than average height. i am thin but at about 5'7" i am far from petite. your idea of "thick" is also drastically different than i think of the term. when i think of "thick," i think of a fuller but at least somewhat muscular body-type like Ice-T's wife CoCo or Beyonce. someone with excess body fat i would not label as thick. i myself would fall somewhere between your 4 and 5 (i have a small chest, very small waist and 36" hips). no matter how hard you try you will never be able to fit everyone into a neat tidy little box, and something like appearance will ALWAYS be highly subjective.

Lilli-  sounds like you are perfect.  5'7 and tin.  Wow.   Perfect !!!!  I think of petite as thin

certain standpoints I would be considered fat, but I don't fk guys who need that much assurance so I'm all good. IF I wanted to be 105 and was in high school (looked like shit I might add), I could easily do lipo, crack, or stop eating bwahahahaha. I like the weight I am at now, but wish some was distributed more to my legs which are a bit small for my big ass.

Nope, I am not 21...you got that right but how old are you saggy balls guy? You can't even write like you speak proper English, so you would not pass my screening anyway. I usually insist a guy knows the difference between a "woman" and "a women" bwahahaha. I don't have to justify anything...I LIKE the way I look, or I could easily run to the surgeon's office like the girls you fk. It's not that hard babe.

-- Modified on 11/2/2012 2:10:13 PM

the curve defined by my waist and hip differential makes me way too womanly to be your type. thanks tho.

also, consult a dictionary (or just the women's clothing section in a shopping mall): a petite woman is 5'4" or shorter. if i attempted to wear a pair of "petite" women's jeans they would look like capris.

You can't write for shit, that's for sure. Now, you are insulting the same hobbyists who play in the very pond your STUPID ass plays in? You can't get hot women for free either, so stfu. Just another loser who wishes he did not have to pay but does. Looks are not everything to women in case you have not figured that out. I would take an old, fat man over your illiterate ass any day and give him a discount to boot.

You are a fktard....end of story. You can use the urban dic to find the meaning because I don't have the time.

any woman with half a brain to even stand next to you. What you miss, is putting a tag on women as skinny, curvy, fat, etc. that is only measured by YOUR dumb ass Socal standards. Guys from other parts of the world would disagree. I was told I was too skinny when I visited Minnesota years ago, so there ya go. Because you say a woman is fat or skinny, does not make her that way dummy...looks are subjective. I might add, that my overall review rating is higher both in performance AND looks than many of the girls YOU have reviewed, so wtf does that tell you? To each his own, that's what.

What you call attractive, others call butt ugly.

-- Modified on 11/2/2012 3:23:06 PM

Your chubby !!   Ha ha ha.   But.....  Don't be angry.  Be HAPPY with what you have.    Sorry to fire you all up.  Now all the men on these boards see your true colors.  And as for the writing...  I'm on an iPhone lady.  It's not easy and is always spelling shit different and changing words I write.  I love you because you make me HAPPY when I'm feeling nappy.  Biz-natch   Peace out.

who I could give two shits about in real life has an effect on me, think again. You're the only clueless fktard on here and my colors have always shown dipshit. Show me when I have ever held back from calling a spade a spade...keep looking. I am not here for business or I might kiss your ass and everyone else's for that matter. Just because you like 12 year old anorexic chicks, does not make someone who is 115 lbs fat.

It must makes you DISTURBED!  I won't be sticking my finger down my throat to appease you dumbass, and AGAIN my overall looks and performance scores are HIGHER than many of those you have reviewed lol. Nuff said. More guys like women who are athletic than bone thin. Just out of curiosity though, what part of me is chubby? Do you see a gut? Thunder Thighs? I don't think so honey, but thanks for playing. I am offended because when you call me fat, you call most every woman on this board fat because most are all over 115 lbs. Here's the thing about fat chicks though...even they would not take money from a piece of shit like you. Learn to write idiot and don't blame your mobile device...I am on one as well ha ha.

Now, hurry and get that underage hooker out of your mom's room before she comes in. We would not want to see you on the 10 oclock news freak.


-- Modified on 11/2/2012 3:21:58 PM

Wow. You are such a nasty angry man. My sympathy to any lady you call. No wonder the lady's are so careful. You are why regular screening can't solve all problems, because you get by. London, etc. .......don't encourage him. Let him sit and stew.

I thought that was really you...and I'm sure that those pics are really you...and adding those bits of fact...you're not a fatty.  But then, my definition of a fatty may be different than FIDCOUGH.  If he thinks 115# puts a gal on par for "The Biggest Loser"...well, that's one opinion.

Now if you had pics of the gal on your site...and in walks a gal hovering in the 250# range...then I call that a "fatty"...and a fake.  And a reason to immediately call that hooker out and warn others.

So let FIDCOUGH babble all he wants here...He's already made the LA board sick with his constant drivel.

I also don't recall any cellulite or folds...maybe I was looking in the wrong places?

WTF is wrong with people?  Your taste is your taste and it's not something you choose (IMO, it's like being gay.....it is what it is).  Who cares?  There are plenty of nerds married to hot woman and plenty of good looking guys married to overweight women.  

I never even gave my friends a hard time if they screwed a big chick in college.  Why would I?  I wasn't the one screwing her.  He got off and I didn't.  He should be the one making fun of me.  LOL.

You have to love people who can't come to terms with the fact that everyone has different tastes.....and you know what?  It's OK.

There are more important things in life than asking if fucking a fatty is OK?

I think that is called "smothering"...and some johnnie boys pay BOG money for a fatty to sit on their faces  LOL

Yep...whatever you're into...what I'm into...it's all good

....I like in-shape 'fill-in-the-blank-race' of men just fine. In the hobby I don't care about body type either way but in "real life" I have a preference for less heavy men but hasn't stopped me from dating them.


And ....

"Mocha-  I'm sure you have plenty of men that love you and love to fuck you."  
You're absolutely right or i'd have been out of commission a long time ago.

And you need to up your meds.

Trust me, I mean really trust me, I know this girl. She is far from fat.  You however have fallen of you hobby whores and hit your head and it's time to go back to your crayons.

Bah, so I have a slim gals tits,average waist and a bbw's ass. I'm soo screwed!! Lmao NOT!

London would be regarded as thin. I recently aw a film with models from 1959--very good looking, but definitely more curvier than models today.

You have nothing to worry about!

And I am saved by the fat!!! Thank you for NOT calling this content curvy/ voluptous chick!!! Gives me more time for me to salivate on the guys that appreciate some shape and curves to their date!!! LOL!!!
All the women who posted are beautiful and deserving of every penny we ask. If not for us you guys would be left with Rosey and Maneula on those lonely nights!!! If you guys were truly content in the choice of women, then why post with such negativity?

Women with large, natural boobs do look more plump...will give you that, but when I have a 26 inch waist and hips that are 35, I would not say fat. Now, I might be "pushing maximum density" as Judd Nelson so eloquently put it in the Breakfast Club lol, but I don't feel the need to go fkin a lipo guy just yet.

Yea, Beenaround, I think you hit all the right spots ha ha. Medic..Touche.

Now, all you boys don't need to come to my aid here because this is some reject stuck in Plastic Land where everyone is perfect, so I can see how I might be above the average weight to him. Still, you could not pay me enough to fk him even if I was doing all the Cocaine in Hollywood.

-- Modified on 11/2/2012 5:39:39 PM

You almost exactly match Marilyn Monroe's measurements. Just an inch off here or there. Not that anyone but FID would care.

I didn't see any posts that had any negativity to them.

Guys who want to pay a hooker to fuck and suck...some like em slim and trim...

Others like the fatty's

Plenty of both to go around....

So why would you think that anyone is negative here?  Guys that express they don't want or need to pay a fatty on a fuck board?  I know that isn't my preference...but then the gals I'm interested in other guys want fatty's.

It's all good....and if not for us johnnie boys...all you gals would be working at Jack in the Box...with some eating up the profits...just kidding...maybe...NOT  LOL

Posted By: SexyJaye7

And I am saved by the fat!!! Thank you for NOT calling this content curvy/ voluptous chick!!! Gives me more time for me to salivate on the guys that appreciate some shape and curves to their date!!! LOL!!!
All the women who posted are beautiful and deserving of every penny we ask. If not for us you guys would be left with Rosey and Maneula on those lonely nights!!! If you guys were truly content in the choice of women, then why post with such negativity?

fat, that the issues arise. Real MEN don't have to pretend they are banging little girls like fktard does. Later...I need to go catch that Ice Cream Truck!

A 6 now is more like a 10 years ago, so I've been told--"vanity sizing" it's called. But Monroe was putting on the pounds in the last two years of her life. She had to be sewn into that dress she wore when she sang "Happy Birthday" to President Kennedy.

does the General Board know as much about your particular brand of "suave" as the LA board?

this lilli person really wants you dude.  believe me, I can tell!

Shit, I met one on craigslist the other day. She told me she was 5'5 199 pounds (not fat). In her own words, lol. She put 199 pounds when she damn well know she weighs 200. Lol. Like 1 pound would make a difference..

...in today's vanity sizing of course. it's funny how an idea has formed in people's minds that MM was much bigger than she actually was. i wear a lot of vintage clothing, have a few shoes and dresses that go as far back as the early 1920s, and let me tell you, people were MUCH smaller. i can just barely squeeze into one of my 1940s size 10 dresses, and in modern clothing i wear a 4 in dresses, 6 in pants (yes i have an ass). Marilyn was no where near a size 12 of today. today's size 12 would have to have been purchased in a "big girl's" store back in the day.

What does age have to do with it? We are all getting older, cant stop it. Anyone that thinks you have to be 21 to do well in this business obviously is not very bright. There are men that prefer the 20 year old, others want the 30 year old and trust me I have some close girlfriends in their forties and they are doing VERY WELL. In this business, honestly age has nothing to do with how successful a provider is. Sorry I do not know you, but had to comment on your post.

Also on your previous posts you called London out for not knowing what you do. Various Law Enforcement types, teaches, lawyers, among other have been caught and busted for soliciting or actually living out their sick fantasies involving underage kids. So what you do for a living does not signal you out from being a pervert, thief or liar. I wanted to comment. I do not know you so I am not pointing the finger at your or accusing you of anything.

Posted By: FIDCUOF

London don't try to justify your looks honey.  It is what it is....you are no young pup.  Here you go getting angry again. You should watch the way to talk on these boards you might scare potential clients away.  Just some food for thought.  No pin intended. ;  . Love you. Kisses

LMAO. Too funny and true. Also in my experience when a guy declares they are so hot, they usually are not and have really ugly personalities. Not the type of client I want to see. Sorry you can give your money to someone else.

The view of us "fattys" on TER is so endearing! You guys must admit, you have the most fun poking at us "fattys" on here than your skinny princesses anyday!

We know some really hot fatty's...but they also don't try and pretend that they are something other than BBW gals either (or fatty's for those expecting that connotation).  It's those that use the fake photos...then try and fool johnnie into paying her...and then complain to TER about a fake review.  Yep...too many of those fatty tubalas  

And if you're going to track down the ice cream truck...and it's the Good Humor guy...see if they have the "malted milk bar".  Get me a dozen and I'll fly you to Chicago to deliver them to me.  Seems like they discontinued those about 30-40 years ago...but maybe not in NO.  Just make sure they're still frozen  LOL

I'll even share some with you...and we can get fat together  LOL

I can pick a gal there...buy her a bakers dozen...take her to the park...and get a BBBJCIMNQNS.

Heluva lot cheaper than the fat broads advertising for 300+  lol

But the best DTBBBJCIMNQNS I've had so far was this little (5'0" 95#) 22 y/o cutie.  This gal was amazing.

But she's gone now....one of the BBW's ate her for lunch  LOL

The most fun are the hookers that have trouble putting two words together and making sense of the "large ball of fire in the sky".

But it seems those days have gone by...so all that is left are the gals who set themselves up...or those that have taken over and pounce on the other hookers like fly's on shit.

Used to be the "good old boys" were the instigators...now it's the hookers that attack their own.

I just heard a story like that today from a good gal pal of mine.  Yep...she was right  

Posted By: SexyJaye7

The view of us "fattys" on TER is so endearing! You guys must admit, you have the most fun poking at us "fattys" on here than your skinny princesses anyday!

I thank the universe daily that I don't have to deal with this shit outside of work. Nothing is a bed of roses but some of these guys are so bad that if I wasn't already gay I would want to be. Again, we get paid very well to deal with what most women have given up on. A big pity that there are some really nice guys mixed in with the garbage. Makes it very hard for them.

The saddest thing is some of them are so unattractive inside and out that to come on a fk board and berate and call the ladies names is a sport to them...maybe they aren't attracted to a larger women but many are. To actively name call those not in there type model is plain pathetic, but pathetic is as pathetic does I guess.

I am 5'2 110 lbs and C cups, bubble butt, flat belly...all my weight is hanging in the T n A department...but I have been called, petite, tiny, spinner ect...I think all the terminoligy is bunk.  Look at pics to get a more accurate idea...and hopefully there will be something in the photo that helps gage size because even photos can be misleading.  I post completely accurate and current photos and dudes always show up cannot believe how tiny AND curvy I am.

By the way, you are insane, London is HOT.

Gone are the days of you guys actually going out to the track and getting what you wanted from us hookers. Fat, short, skinny, or tall, pick and choose what you want, pay up, do your business and drive off- no problem! Now it is so convenient to window shop on the internet and order up sex like pizza. You can't knock the manipulation of the craft, some women make a lot off money of another woman's pics. Most don't do that and some do, so be it. I am not sure what your complaint is, fake pictures or the warped perception of calling HWP ladies fattys?
I am not here to get into a pissing contest with anyone. I will only piss on you if you ask me nicely and pay me a premium.

Are usually as ugly inside and out as a hat full of monkeys assholes. And if they are that good looking, they could get more pussy than they know what to do for free and walk away afterward. However if the attitude smells like a fresh pile of steaming dog shit, well no ya know why it's here. We get the bug bucks to put up with it..nose peg and all.

me to let you know that they find that term offensive.

And you wouldn't want to find out what happens when monkey's go bonkers...would you?

Is the nose peg extra?  

Well...I won't pay extra for the piss

But if you can really talk dirty...and make it sound like it's natural...you got me  

And I am NOT suggesting that HWP are fatty's.  To qualify as a fatty the mere definition is NOT HWP.  Kind of an oxymoron...don't you think?

And even if a hooker is a fatty...all I ask is put up the pics of herself...and be the gal that answers the door.

It's the fatty's who steal pics (or use 15+ year old ones when they weren't fatty's) that are asinine.  Plenty of johnnie boys like fatty gals.  Hell, if the shoe was on the other foot, and you wanted to hire a male hooker...you want to hire what attracts you.  And not have Larry Flynt show up at the door when you were expecting Liam Neeson (probably not who you wanted anyhow...but better than Larry Flynt).

And FWIW I only went to the track once...didn't like it.

Posted By: SexyJaye7

Gone are the days of you guys actually going out to the track and getting what you wanted from us hookers. Fat, short, skinny, or tall, pick and choose what you want, pay up, do your business and drive off- no problem! Now it is so convenient to window shop on the internet and order up sex like pizza. You can't knock the manipulation of the craft, some women make a lot off money of another woman's pics. Most don't do that and some do, so be it. I am not sure what your complaint is, fake pictures or the warped perception of calling HWP ladies fattys?
I am not here to get into a pissing contest with anyone. I will only piss on you if you ask me nicely and pay me a premium.

As for age Sidney...you are correct. Most every time we have a thread about which age range guys prefer in the hobby, they are always 35 plus...I never make the cut lol. Guys who insist on ONLY barely legal girls, well..do I really need to go on? Couple that with they must be 100 lbs. with no ass, and um yea. Nuff said.

Sporty  ,  How good looking are you  ?  ROFL   Do you have a clue how goofy you sound ?

 Seriously,  one genuine curiosity question , Are you OK with a 5'11 woman
wearing 4 inch heels around you ?

 I'm guessing DEFINITELY  NOT ,  unless you have your own heels on .
   
You  forget the guys  who pay because women can't stand listening  to their  rap  , no matter who you think you are  .  
 
  Something  tells me you fall in that category ,  everywhere you go .  Peace

     

 
 
 


 

 

Oh god pardon my typos.....too late to edit. ugh.

Posted By: TrulyMsMocha

I have belly ("large" depends on who you ask but lol I have enough) but you make clearly make out the difference in by boobs from my abdomen from my hips/waist I have shape and am not one odd-shaped mass, my hips area is right at 42'', my chest is 40+ (44DD maybe bigger I need a re-sizing lol), at 5'5'' about 180-ish lbs pretty sure that puts me in 11 too.  

I sort of cover about 3 of these so um yeah.
.... what's the point of this again?

Posted By: clarence37

but I was just browsing around  CL "women for men" posts, and I see a young girl looking...

says she is 5'6", 230# (not quite a bbw) - her words.

Or the lady I met recently who is very pretty, and nice, and sweet - and her belly is bigger than her 36dd chest, it's bigger than my belly, and she calls herself a "small bbw".

Can we get some kind of standard here? I happen to be attracted to busty, curvy ladies, but I would still like an accurate representation of what I am going to be paying for. OK, here's my scale, everyone please copy it down and carry it with them at all times :

1. emaciated: bones pressing through skin, pop eyes, no muscle tone in legs. Diseased.
2. scrawny: no breasts, bony hips, spindly legs. Frightening.
3. skinny: very little body fat. rudimentary breasts. Hot to men who like young boys.
4. thin: small waist, 24" or less. Breasts B cup or smaller, hips no wider than 34". Nice, spinner.
5. slim: up to 26" waist, up to C cup breasts, up to 36" hips. Hot.
6. average: up to 28" waist, up to D cup, up to 38" hips. still Hot.
7. curvy: Bigger difference between breasts/ hips and waist. waist up to 30", breasts MIN D cup. still Hot.
8. voluptuous: Big everything: min D cup, waist 28-34, hips 36-40. Hot if you are a Rubens fan.
9. thick: Big everything, but smaller difference between breasts/hips and waist. You must be into large women to enjoy her.
10. BBW: Large belly. Hips wider than 42". May or may not have large breasts, but chest is 40"+. Only for the fans.
11. Obese: #9 and #10 may technically (medically) qualify as obese, which I believe is only 25% above your "ideal" body weight? But ladies in category #11 are pretty rare in this venue, I've only seen them in calendars and some niche porn flicks. You have to be a REAL fan.

So anyway some of this may be insulting, IDN, and I hate people who insult others for their size, so I offer humble apologies. Personally, I would fall into the male equivalent of between 8 and 9, I suppose, and I am strongly attracted to women from 5 - 8, 4 if she is very beautiful, 9 and maybe 10 if she has a pretty face and nice breasts.

Is that the description you use in the male seeking male adds or is that what tell the little boys and girls at story time.
Don't assume everyone here is old, ugly, and fat. I'm not going to describe my self im afraid you might get turned on, but I'm over the age of 18 so I wouldn't interest you.

Everything you say is about weight, and appearance. I'm going to take a guess here.
I'll bet you are a military brat, with a very strict daddy that told you were fat and made you work out, told you what to eat. It made you mad that he would never understand that you were gay. So you search for daddy approval by fighting with hookers.

Yea you're just a douche canoe

London, princess, you are an absolute delight and I enjoyed reading this whole thread and giggling so much my tummy hurt (my huge, flabby 25" tummy).  My espresso even got spilled in the process of greedily jumping to click on reply to post how I think it's rad you don't deem it necessary to kiss ass for the sake of playing it safe.  You stick up for yourself and I wish more girls would stand their ground and also make a playtime out of it for the amusement of everyone else and themselves

As for the guidelines on figures and how to properly describe them,  I believe it is the hobbyist who last saw the provider that is in charge of what the provider's figure is, isn't it?  I know I never had the option of what kind of frame I have.  Im listed as athletic but when I think of athletic I think of soccer players cyclists, not me at all.  If I had a choice I would say dancer, you know, thin but toned and hips and a petite top.  I don't know this could all just be my oatmeal talking but, I guess what I am saying is its really nobodys picnic to have all providers and hobbyists have to conform to such a vague system of figure description but since that's our only choice, oh well.

Well, I really need to visit the general board more often if it's always this heated.  I am really happy about making the choice to read this whole thread.  I'm thoroughly amused and I hope to starting everyday reading this board and just keep my fingers crossed that GB is always this crazy and fun!

Oh, if anyone is going to bash me about sounding like a dyke in love with London, then don't even bother I am aware of it and, oh well.  Maybe I am!

XXX-Giselle

it amazes me that all of us have not turned all out gay before now. *Sighs* lol.

Posted By: giselle69

London, princess, you are an absolute delight and I enjoyed reading this whole thread and giggling so much my tummy hurt (my huge, flabby 25" tummy).  My espresso even got spilled in the process of greedily jumping to click on reply to post how I think it's rad you don't deem it necessary to kiss ass for the sake of playing it safe.  You stick up for yourself and I wish more girls would stand their ground and also make a playtime out of it for the amusement of everyone else and themselves

As for the guidelines on figures and how to properly describe them,  I believe it is the hobbyist who last saw the provider that is in charge of what the provider's figure is, isn't it?  I know I never had the option of what kind of frame I have.  Im listed as athletic but when I think of athletic I think of soccer players cyclists, not me at all.  If I had a choice I would say dancer, you know, thin but toned and hips and a petite top.  I don't know this could all just be my oatmeal talking but, I guess what I am saying is its really nobodys picnic to have all providers and hobbyists have to conform to such a vague system of figure description but since that's our only choice, oh well.

Well, I really need to visit the general board more often if it's always this heated.  I am really happy about making the choice to read this whole thread.  I'm thoroughly amused and I hope to starting everyday reading this board and just keep my fingers crossed that GB is always this crazy and fun!

Oh, if anyone is going to bash me about sounding like a dyke in love with London, then don't even bother I am aware of it and, oh well.  Maybe I am!

XXX-Giselle

I'm not quite sure what my point was when I wrote it because I have lately been just typing stream-of-consciousness and trying to figure it out later. So here is what I'd really like to say:

- many women tend to be less than accurate about their descriptions, representing themselves as smaller than they really are - like the 5'6, 230 pound girl who doesn't think she is a "bbw". I don't blame women for this, since the world expects every woman to be skinny. This thread proves my point, with all the morons calling anyone over 110# fat.
-look at photos, yeah I know, brilliant, because photos are never posed at strategic angles to obscure the truth.
-blame the guy who wrote the review. Yeah, because if a guy likes the woman he just saw, he is faced  with calling her "baby fat, flabby, heavy, etc". All adjectives for smaller women are nice or neutral. All for larger women are rude and insulting. No hobbyist who enjoys a woman's company is going to call her "flabby" EVEN IF SHE IS. It's one of the reasons that a scale like my JOKE scale is better. I THINK it would be easier to call a woman that you like "curvy, thick, voluptuous" as long as we all know the scale and what it means.

ah, there's more but I gotta go. This thread is over, anyways

Petite simply means short! Many men are confused about this. Department stores that have petite sections and Petite Stores are for women 4'11- 5'3, sizes range 0-14. Skinny and petite is the description that needs to be used for most spinner types. Remember some women can skinny and have big boobs, just the same a woman can be a bbw and have small boobs. Very difficult to generalize women using weight and height. I myself prefer very feminine builds such as London's beautiful frame. But to each their own... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

I was going to remind y'all I was a professional photographer, but to he'll with that. I will just sit in a corner and watch

you still don't buy long pants. Fkin idiots lol.

I like your posts. Thank you for having some sensitivity and logic behind your name. It's so refreshing.

Posted By: clarence37

I'm not quite sure what my point was when I wrote it because I have lately been just typing stream-of-consciousness and trying to figure it out later. So here is what I'd really like to say:

- many women tend to be less than accurate about their descriptions, representing themselves as smaller than they really are - like the 5'6, 230 pound girl who doesn't think she is a "bbw". I don't blame women for this, since the world expects every woman to be skinny. This thread proves my point, with all the morons calling anyone over 110# fat.
-look at photos, yeah I know, brilliant, because photos are never posed at strategic angles to obscure the truth.
-blame the guy who wrote the review. Yeah, because if a guy likes the woman he just saw, he is faced  with calling her "baby fat, flabby, heavy, etc". All adjectives for smaller women are nice or neutral. All for larger women are rude and insulting. No hobbyist who enjoys a woman's company is going to call her "flabby" EVEN IF SHE IS. It's one of the reasons that a scale like my JOKE scale is better. I THINK it would be easier to call a woman that you like "curvy, thick, voluptuous" as long as we all know the scale and what it means.

ah, there's more but I gotta go. This thread is over, anyways

That man, along with about 3 others, shine above the scum in this pond. Sad that they are in the tiny minority and the rest just float around stinking up the place like large bloated blobs of rotting algae.

...how the same words can mean so many different things to so many different people. While I do think that general body type guide lines on reviews and such are useful to help gents narrow down to find their type, I also think that they can be incredibly vague and not helpful. Case in point: Me! Here's a list of how I have been described by different people...and for the record, I am 5'6, 127# and 34c-26-36 and wear a size 4/6.

1. Petite: I don't think 5'6" is short. I don't think it's tall either. And I suppose that it was more in reference to my body size. But to some, I think my height and/or my clothing size would disqualify me as being petite

2. Curvy: More in reference to my shape; I do have a pretty dramatic waist to hip ratio. But to some, curvy can mean BBW, or someone with a much more ample bosom, or someone with an overall more voluptuous figure.

3. Athletic: I do yoga and pilates, so I do have some muscle definition, but I'm certainly not ripped. I've got some softness to me! My lack of 6 pack abs or Madonna like arms may disqualify me by some from being labeled athletic.

4. Slender: I'd say this is probably most accurate. It implies (at least to me) that I'm not skinny per se, but on the smaller side and healthy. But again, that's pretty subjective; that may not be everyone's definition of that word.

5. HWP: Again, an overall accurate call. But then again, I think this is accurate to most people who fall into the BMI scale of 18-25...so not very descriptive at all.

In the end, it's hard for me to nail down what words I would use to describe my body type/shape because it really is all subjective and furthermore, trying to figure out some sort of concrete wording system is impossible. I mean, your #3 is gross to you, but it may be some other guys dream girl. And your #5 is hot to you, but to others it may be too big or small. You've got your rating system all figured out; you can't really place it on anyone else.

As the old cliche goes "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." I know everyone else has already said it...but it's the truth.

-- Modified on 11/3/2012 7:11:41 PM

you ARE my type for sure London, and great news....I read, write and spell at or above a 10th grade level

Why are you pointing out all the women that aren't your type? You've already stated you type, and it's not a good or bad thing, it's just a thing. I'm sure I'm not your type, either. I'm not blond or tan, and my tatas aren't huge (I assume that's what you mean when you say "California beach babe"). No one woman is ever going to be every man's type. So pointing out who specifically isn't your type on a public forum just seems like you're trying too hard to get these women upset with you...almost like you're mad at them for not being your type, which is just kind of silly. As you said to Ms. Mocha, there are men that love her just the way she is. There are men who love all the women on her just the way they are. So there's no need for any of us to change.

At least do it correctly. It's "fatties" not "fatty's."

Kind of odd...don't you think?

I tend to stay away from scum infested areas...unless I find that I'm totally attracted to it.

Perhaps you agree  LOL  (hint...actions speak much louder than words)

You could just email those 3 hunks...and avoid the rest of the cesspool...just a thought!!

It just doesn't really work sweetie.

Petite...sorry, but 5'6" is not petite.  Others have babbled based on clothing sizes...but in my book petite is around 5'0" and under 125#

Curvy is just a polite TER saying that really means fatty.

Athletic is used by mamby pamby boys who's TER handles you gals have...and don't want to tell the reader of a review that the gal is a fatty.

Slender...that's a toughie.  Could mean she's a druggie.  I usually ask the reviewers more questions.

HWP...again, you have the guys TER handle...and he doesn't want to call you a fatty in a review.

So...as you summarized in your post...these definitions mean crapola.  Anyone with half a functioning brain will back channel to see if you (or the hooker of choice) is really worth the price of admission.

And FWIW...I hear that you are a hottie.  Not quite what I am looking for...but a hottie    I like my hookers really little...as in petite...as in 5'0 and 110#.  But if I ever decide to branch out...you are highly recommended  

Wrong-O smarty pants

Would you care to give that a try?

I've never been there...how about you?

I'd love you to suck my dick for as long as you can, and I will ride you hard.   I like thick girls.

and thanks for the great photos on your site. Beautiful. I used to have a buddy on the Keys, but he's moved on so I don't get to Florida anymore, but you give me incentive to try to get there

and thank you for YOUR images. yikes

'your #3 is gross to you, but it may be some other guys dream girl. And your #5 is hot to you, but to others it may be too big or small. You've got your rating system all figured out; you can't really place it on anyone else. '

My point exactly. I wasn't implying that people should use my rating system, the command to "copy it down and carry it everywhere" was tongue-in-cheek.

I think that's a much better way of going about this than by using numbers, which mean nothing, really.

For example, here are some examples below:

Athletic/curvy:  Kate Upton
Curvy:  Kat Dennings
BBW:  Late-era Anna Nicole Smith