I just commented on my regional board about reviews and something occurred to me.

Never considered that viewpoint. Makes sense though

1. I've never done a review with a provider present ...  
2. I have no intention to ...
3. If I did, it wouldn't be ANY different ...  

...TER checks IP addresses. If you and the provider write it together TER will note if either of you logged in from the others IP address and/or any combination of devices. They would be suspicious of this and at the very least not post the review. They could delist her and have done so to others in the past. There would likely be a consequence of some kind for you.

There is nothing wrong with literally talants and a review should be tasteful, but some looks and performance might be heighten easily. Well, if you wish any good to an escort anyway. What if permormance and expectations won't be on par with actual thing? Do you still want to write it together? Very awkward. If you want some kind of special treatment from a lady, this might work though. But then hobbyists will be deluded. And they are who is paying. Since TER only get small equal amount for VIP membership from both, clients and escorts and beneficiary here are nevertheless escorts, resource should maintain credibility. I believe TER more for male hobbysts since they need more information on particular escort. Xo

and if I was offered any menu items that don't appear on her profile, I ask about whether or not I should mention those (typically not.)

It's contrary to the entire concept of a review.  
And frankly it puts you into a category of reviewer that is useless to other VIPs.  
If you want to make her happy either tip her or buy her a nice gift.  
But co-writing the review is a weenie move.

I agree in that I've always asked if she objects to a review.  
I've had several ask to not be reviewed and two locals have had their entire set of reviews removed...not sure why
So I respect her wishes.

She will affect the review, it is just human nature and common sense.  

Either that or the guy was gay.

You don't need to rely on some cuckoo formula like "the reviews were posted in the same month" or "the provider was there when he wrote the review"?

I completely understand why it's a conflict of interest now. I suppose I didn't think about that side of it when I started this thread.

Are you dipping your toe in the water now?

Stick to price negotiation at JD Uni.....

... mongers and the provider:  asking the provider to validate profile info for a first review--the one that creates the provider's profile.  I've seen many cases over the years where the initial profile was inaccurate in one or more respects, or there were "don't know"s that could have been filled in if the provider had been asked (although some of those might have been for "YMMV" situations).

I sure couldn't write a unbias review right after I cum!   I store the draft away in a secure place 7 post it after a week or 2...  after re-reading & possible editing.

...when my time to be reviewed comes.

I may never write one. I may write one soon. I don't know yet.

I agree with Jack. What's that worth? Not much? Figures. How many reviews do you have?

-- Modified on 5/15/2016 6:02:30 PM

Some people here seem to think you "owe" the rest of us regular reviews. Obviously, peer pressure hasn't worked on me either. I do commend you for asking relevant questions and not getting all bent out of shape when you get answers you weren't expecting. Lots of newbies come on these boards trying to tell everyone else how they should do things, the smart ones try to get a feel for things before running their mouths. You definitely seem to be in category number two. Good for you.

Now, be specific here, are you referring to reviews that where co-written with input from the provider or fake reviews written by assholes.  

no, that's the exact opposite of a reason to write a review.

eom

143?? Wow. Not that I'm feeling inadequate or anything.