The Asian houses in the SF Bay Area have been gravitating that way for the past few years. Again I don't know why; it's not all of them to be sure, but it's pretty common among the Korean AAMPs, and also some of the MILF/GILF Chinese/Taiwanese orgs.
Of course it's not "safe", but I think it's probably a risk people (and providers) are willing to take. HIV risk in particular is pretty low for female to male vaginal sex (btw I'm not advocating anything, but do that research and you'll see what I'm talking about; HIV is a blood-borne disease, and unless there's blood or open sores, it's very hard to transmit). Of course there's plenty of others things to worry about. FWIW at many of these orgs there's not even an expectation of an upcharge.Trying to figure out why some providers (it seems to be mostly Asian agencies in the west) are advertising BBFS, seems to be new in the last few weeks.
I always thought that was the third rail of hobbying because of multiple risks involved (but that some were able to negotiate this secretly). Have people decided there are so many other risks now that it doesn't matter? Or something else happen to make this safer?
The Asian houses in the SF Bay Area have been gravitating that way for the past few years. Again I don't know why; it's not all of them to be sure, but it's pretty common among the Korean AAMPs, and also some of the MILF/GILF Chinese/Taiwanese orgs.
Of course it's not "safe", but I think it's probably a risk people (and providers) are willing to take. HIV risk in particular is pretty low for female to male vaginal sex (btw I'm not advocating anything, but do that research and you'll see what I'm talking about; HIV is a blood-borne disease, and unless there's blood or open sores, it's very hard to transmit). Of course there's plenty of others things to worry about.
FWIW at many of these orgs there's not even an expectation of an upcharge.
It's not just bay area. LA and now Vegas have been all offering bbfs, Asian girls-wise. With the invention of prep, girls can be relatively safe a and entice BB fiends to get better traffic their way.
successful career until their kidneys fail.
Yeah, I wonder if PREP plays a part; wouldn't be surprised if some of the K-Girls are on it.
I personally know one ultra low-volume provider who is on it, but she's a Caucasian independent lady, not an AAMP girl.
Its being offered because of high demand. There is another discussion site that has many message board on many cities around the us for bbfs.
Providers are having to put no bbfs in their ads to keep bbfs crowd away.
Just maybe they are trying to differentiate themselves from the high priced, non-GFE providers/agencies. One thing I have noticed while just perusing reviews is that non-GFE prices have became the same as GFE prices. What better way to gain business than to give PSE services for GFE prices. Just my opinion.
BBFS is the ultimate catch-22 you DON'T want to do it with someone who does .......and you are more open to Doing it with someone who doesn't.
in any case i cant imagine being comfortable with anyone who advertises it, let alone does it indiscriminately with first time visitors.
allow me to admit i have succumb on occasion and sweated for weeks after. and just because HIV is tough to get via vaginal sex you shouldnt get comfy because there are plenty of other too common aliments out there.
This! Idk how many times I see an ad for bbfs and think I wouldn't want to be near them in a hazmat suit. Otoh I think the reason the girls you'd want to do bbfs with look like that is because they don't take risks and take care of themselves.
I've noticed a uptick in ads for this as well in the DMV area.
Actually....I think it denotes " District, Maryland, Virginia"
The National Capital Region portion of the Washington Metropolitan Area is also colloquially known by the acronym "DMV" which stands for the "District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia." The area in the region that is surrounded by Interstate 495 referred to as being "Inside the Beltway".
.
aka, the swamp
between Fester's ears.
Isn't that what I said? Lol!
It can be both -- I think those south of Baltimore, and inland rather than on the coast, tend to see it only as DC-MD-VA
-- Modified on 12/22/2020 6:12:47 PM
Been through this before. There are no K-Agencies, K-Amps in Washington, DC. I guess one could say DelMarVa to say the general area. DMV can be both DC, Maryland, and Virginia, but then that would be misguiding because there are no K-Agencies or AMPs as we know it in DC proper.
check out the Chicago board .. talk about a guy with dozens of review where he clearly states he did BBFS in fact even arranged with the girl before he showed up .. for what its worth these were $120 to $200 ladies.
guess it takes all kinds. i worry about those ladies long term health.
interesting this thread on BBFS .. 5 years ago TER wouldn't even allow this topic to be mentioned -- guess its part of the realization that despite better judgement it does go on. fortunately for all of us, the majority of ladies are careful and don't permit it. but its only putting one's head in the sand to not acknowledge it also goes on more than discussed and perhaps more than it should. and this applies to independent as well as agency ladies.
perhaps by bringing it out in the open is a good thing so people (ok i mean guys) will realize they are not "the only one" or " i never do this with anyone" might not be so reassuring.
You say 5 years ago TER wouldn’t even allow this topic to be mentioned. This is not correct. If you had said, “10 years ago, TER didn’t allow BBFS to be mentioned in ads or reviews,” then you might be correct. TER started allowing BBFS in reviews and ads from late 2011. Before that it wasn’t allowed to be mentioned in reviews and ads, but it was always allowed to be discussed on the discussion boards.
interesting this thread on BBFS .. 5 years ago TER wouldn't even allow this topic to be mentioned -- guess its part of the realization that despite better judgement it does go on. fortunately for all of us, the majority of ladies are careful and don't permit it. but its only putting one's head in the sand to not acknowledge it also goes on more than discussed and perhaps more than it should. and this applies to independent as well as agency ladies.
perhaps by bringing it out in the open is a good thing so people (ok i mean guys) will realize they are not "the only one" or " i never do this with anyone" might not be so reassuring.
yes you are right .. more like 10 years .. Wow -- time flies .. i go back at look at some old reviews that i thought were more recent and cant believe how fast time has flown. point is, for the longest time BBFS was not allowed discussed and that it might be beneficial its more out in the open these days.
I found posts discussing BBFS going back as far as 2001, so your point basically is completely WRONG.
Perfect Storm was correct (naturally) where it comes to reviews mentioning BBFS, but that is not what you were claiming when you first posted, nor is it what you are saying now about BBFS not even permitted to be discussed which is 100% wrong as my link proves beyond any doubt.
Here is what a search under the keyword "BBFS" brings up just on this one TER board, almost FOUR THOUSAND posts mentioning BBFS going back 20 years.
Don't worry, keep posting long enough and eventually you'll get something right.
It is my recollection that BBFS was always allowed to be discussed in forum but frowned upon in the actual reviews. There was a time that is was an option to click in reviews BUT that may have been the dog site that was taken down in Operation Fleacollar.
I am assuming you are an "old fucker" because you have been here even longer than me. lol And ironically I was on the Woof Woof board before I found my way here.
But you are slightly mistaken, You are correct that "discussion" of BBFS has always been allowed here, but mentioning it in actual reviews was never allowed until relatively recently. I honestly don't remember the Large Canine position on BBFS reviews, I can't even remember the last time I read one, or even logged onto that site.
