I have this friend that has submitted many reviews to TER in the past, even making it to the top 100.  For the past year, he has not submitted any reviews.  The reason is because more and more ladies insisted that his reviews hurt their business.  

The reason for this is because this hobbyist will visit and review transexuals as well as natural born women.  There is a significant number of hobbyists that do not want to see ladies who have seen a man who has seen a shemale.  The cross pollination of last week's mutual rimjob with a TS and this weeks long french kissing session with a popular ATF is troubling for some.  And they will tell the provider that they will no longer see them or cancel a visit, when they read a review by a man that previously reviewed a t-girl encounter involving the normal activities between a man and his tranny.  This can result in the provider complaining about their reviews and saying whatever they have to for removal, even though the reviews are accurate.

The activities have intensified and there has been no lag in spreading the love.  Its just that it doesn't get documented anymore.  

Is it best to refrain from recording these encounters, or is this a valuable service to those that what to know, for whatever reason, regardless of the needs of the providers service to tranniphobic men?

-- Modified on 5/16/2010 1:56:27 PM

"friend"? right...ok...

If a provider asks you (or your "friend") not to review her and it wasn't a rip-off session I would say don't review her.

Which relates directly to the last part the the OP's post...

I’m assuming anal sex is a common activity ‘round these parts.

Is a penis penetrating an anus a different penis depending on the human it’s attached to? Is there something magically different about men who engage in anal penetration vs women who do the same…?


“pre-op cooties?. Really?

Unfortunately statistics prove anal sex is more dangerous among bi-sexual men. It's the tearing of the rectum lining inside that results in open lesions then transferring bodily fluids. YES "we all use condoms", (we hope) but, it's just not as safe.   And we ALL don't have anal sex.


Anyway...those are just the facts.  Very different-- men who engage in anal sex with men.

And straight men who engage in anal sex with women.  BUT,  you still don't know who has slept with whom prior.....

What she is talking about is TER's long standing rule that the only time a client is allowed to have and write reviews under two handles (profiles) at the same time is if one of those profiles writes reviews for TGirls.

What she is suggesting, is that the OP's friend create a new profile to write his TGirl reviews under.

So having a separate profile, would solve the issue with the OP's friend's reviews.

@ +/- 53%

Which leaves +/- 47% of that pie to everyone else—including heterosexuals. That per CDC stats across a large demographic.

Then, look at a place like Washington DC---which from CDC perspective is in the midst of an HIV/AIDS epidemic. There you find that, overall, 37% of HIV transmission is MSM contact and 27% is heterosexual contact. Among African Americans secifcally, the leading mode of transmission is heterosexual contact @31.8%, followed by MSM @28.3%.

So, yes, statistically speaking, sexual contact with bisexual men increases risk of HIV transmission. But, at some point this becomes a numbers game.  When you factor in the myriad other behavioral factors that come into play with HIV transmission; intravenous drug use, the men who claim to be heterosexual when behaviorally they aren’t, men and women engaging in high risk sexual behavior, those who have contracted HIV but are unaware and have transmitted the virus to their partner……who in turn, are unaware and now putting their partners at risk...

The surprising number of people who still believe only 'gays get aids'...

Any of whom could walk in your door any day of the week….

You start to get on a slippery slope when pointing fingers at men who have engaged in sex with transgendered men.

Another analysis

In 2007

Transmission Category

Male-to-male sexual contact = 16,749 = 46%

Injection drug use = 6,010 = 17%

Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use = 1,664 = 5%

High-risk heterosexual contact* = 11,111 = 31%

Other**= 401= 1%
______________________________________________
*Heterosexual contact with a person known to have, or to be at high risk for, HIV infection.
** Includes hemophilia, blood transfusion, perinatal exposure, and risk not reported or not identified.

The fact is even today gays still account for more than 50% of new HIV infections where heterosexual activity account for 31%.  But this only part of the story because the number of male to female sexual contact is probable 10 times larger than male to male contacts.  This suggest the relative risk for HIV transmission of male to male sexual contact is 16 time greater than male to female sexual contact. Part of this is do to higher prevalence of HIV in gay population and that the dominate mode of sexual contact is the riskier anal sex.

With respect to DC the higher than national figures among heterosexual can be attribute to greater use of IV drugs in that population as well as to the very high percentage of black in that population. Although Black/African American represent only 13% of the population that account for 49% of the new HIV infections in 2007.

The fact is that anyone involve in man to man sex, be it between gay or transsexual contact, is at higher risk not only because of the activity but because of the likely higher HIV prevalence in that population.

The facts are what they are. They are not racist, homophobic or transgender-phobic

When that cock goes up your ass, or in your mouth, that's just gay!
Your stats don't hold up, nor your conclusions.  HIV is still predominetly a gay male disease!  They practice uncovered anal sex tearing open anal membranes and causing an almost 100% chance of spread for both partners if one is infected.
Then, yummy, eat the fudgesickle!

Why do men steer away from women who do TS's? Simple, they are nothing more than gays in lingerie, and practice the same unsafe sex with their parners and , gaaaag, SO's!

One more thing...the use of terms like tranniphobic, or homophobic!  It means I "fear" these groups!  Nothing could be further from the truth, I just find them repulsive, genetic misfits, a subset lost in the middle!  Lepers who hang out in their own, dark little corners, and continue to attempt breeding.  Fortunately these creatures are sterile hybrids, like mules, and TS and gay breeding cannot occur. Although I'm sure, somwhere there is a scientist working on making an embryo adhere to the rectal wall, so the lovely couple can raise a child!  ECCCCCCH!