My last 3 meetings I found flaws I didn’t like but I had a good time.
One girl had baby damage and stretch marks that didn’t show in her pictures. I don’t like that shit at all especially at her high rates.
Another had those duck lips because she hid her face. She was fun but I would have never reached out had I seen them. She wasn’t deceptive and her body was tight. I got used to the lips lol !
The last one had tons of tattoos which isn’t my thing. On her pictures they were all removed. She did say she had a few but there was over 10. She was in the process of having them removed.
Before the last 3 . I been seeing a couple regulars and from what I remember they were like their pictures with nothing misleading.
But I pay a premium for that. I honestly cant say the last time I was disappointed in a girls looks, although the girls who are not face out always look different in person than in my minds eye, lol, but almost never for the worse.
.
When I first started, I was disappointed very often, but it wasn't the girls fault (except in one specific case as that girl bait and switched me) it was mine, as I didn't know how to do research like I do now.
I only see well reviewed ladies with average scores of 9 & 10 and never below 8. Where I play that often means above average rates, but it's worth it to me.
When yhe door opens..
20% A. 40% B (or close enough). 40% C. Usually refarding weight/age
Interesting responses do far. Your % spread is close to what I was expecting.
I would say most are actually somewhere between B and C. I suppose it depends what one defines as pretty accurate vs. disappointed. For me, pretty accurate is fairly close to 100% of what I expected based on pics. Whereas, disappointed is closer to it not even being the lady in the pic. But for most on here who do their homework, C is probably fairly rare. That's more likely to happen if you take more risks.
However, I find that even well reviewed ladies can often be closer to 75% than 100% of what I saw in the pic, but in some ways I expect this to be the case. By the time they get a fair amount of reviews, they are likely not noobs in the game. But so many are using the same pics from 5 or 10 years ago. Being older than their pics seems somewhat common. Then, if they have a blemish of some sort, many will digitally touch it up. So, when I show up, she may be slightly older and have blemishes I didn't see in her pics, but still be good looking. So, I'm not exactly disappointed, but her pics could have been more accurate.
But I do get some Bs mixed in. A and C are less common for me. There was one lady though who had over 100 reviews and a 9.2 rating who was totally not who I saw in the picture. She was much heavier. And, not only were the reviews misleading, but reviews that poured in since I have seen her continue to be misleading. This one is wild to me, so idk what is going on. And, once in awhile, I get an A and feel like I hit the jackpot.
Really, I'd say all were B EXCEPT, once in a blue moon there is someone that the camera can't quite capture. I remember one provider in NYC - she was pretty in her pictures, for sure -- but when I got there, she had a radiance and beauty that were other-worldly, ethereal. My jaw dropped to the floor, and I spent about a minute sputtering "How did I find you? Where have you been?" But those are very rare.
In general, and I'd ask other long-term semi-professional hobbyists like Mr Fisher this question: hasn't the industry matured over the past 20 years to the point that the market, for the most part, simply won't tolerate messing around too much with photos. It's become a mature industry.
Not that surprising from my perspective but this thread seems to stand a bit apart from a number of other threads related to reviews. Not sure why.
Anyhow, answering your question, I'm a bit lower on the A side than others, maybe 5% or a bit more. B is solidly around the 85% level and the remaining fall into C, so less than 10%. Side note, that bottom 10% almost exclusively comes from outside the USA.
