according to ter,every provider gets a rating of 7,unless she provides one of the following

1=bbbj
2=anal
3=bi
4=dfk
so explain to me how a lady gets a score of 10 when the reviewer only mentions bi and bbbj

this is bs,ive tried many times to give a lady a 10 and got turned down.

looks like there scoring needs to be checked a lil closer.

SHe does not have to do all of them with you. She only needs to offer them. Not every gut wants the whole alphabet. If you check all her reviews did she say any of those things are not available, if so use the problem report feature.

I have found other reviews that by what was offered the score was too high. SOme of the checkers don't seem to catch that so again use the problem report and they will change the review score...PLUS you get 2 days addded to your VIP membership.

Don't make a rant, and criticize this site if you have NO fucking clue what you're talking about !!!

Re-read the criteria for reviews!

From what I understand, a lady can get a higher score, as long as it is on the menu, even if the guy did not choose to partake. This can usually be revealed in her reviews. If she has a history of giving those items, she can usually get the higher score, even if her  original review does not list them on the menu. Things are added and taken off a ladies menu since her original review, so it pays to read them

Is a lady only "really bi" if she offers doubles? If she truly enjoys those doubles (and how would TER know that?) What if she is "really bi" in her civilian life, but doesn't see women as clients or offer doubles?

Also, it goes along with the rest of the items listed in that not all clients think that's a positive thing

I'm with you -- I think TER's practice of docking review points based on some mystery person's idea of what makes a date a 10 is ridiculous.

Forever stuck at 9/10 even though I am "really bi" in my civilian life,
Carrie

In a quick review of the Lady you gave a 10 performance rating to, you mentioned that as part of the experience you had the BBBJ and the DFK, but there is no mention of a trip to Greece and since it wasn't a double you did not confirm through actual experience that she was really BI. You do mention that the Lady mentioned she liked the taste of pussy and that she said she was BI. To quote from your review "informed me that she luvs the taste of pussy, i was oh realy,somtime i guess there a possibility of a threesome in my future she replyed oh yes.i was smiling after that thought running threw my head.being BI ."

So there you have your answer.. the service or expereince has to only be available to have the higher performance rating applied.

C_K

i believe we are on the same page!!
im not knocking ter its just that at times i dont see how they evauate scores.

A lady doesn't need to do a double to get a ten. Most 10s are just a session with a single lady. It seems like anal makes it easier to get a 10, but it's not always required.

I once had a really hot session with a great lady. One of those when you're dying to skip the prelims and just fuck her. But I had to do a quick suck and lick session so I could give a performance score consistent with the intensity of the session

who left you in charge...you need to brush up on your personalty skills.ignorance seems to be your specilty.

Offers doubles? Yes/no
Does couples?   Yes/no

IMHO

You made a statement & criticism that was factually incorrect.  Get your shit straight before you bitch publicly about something which you are clueless.

Since there's another item on that list that's not up my alley.

So to speak.

*cough*

But like all things I love, sometimes it does things that annoy the piss outta me.

after reading your reviews,im sure you deserve a 10,it will happen soon, i think dallas is very lucky to have your availability.

Really, Sparky? Really?
Take one look at your sentences and you'll realize who the truly ignorant one is. If you can't use the language...STFU.

You were a lot less annoying when you were just asking ignorant personal questions of providers every week, or shilling over and over again for that young chick you nailed...and that's really saying something....because that was annoying as HELL.

Next time you feel the urge to go for the keyboard...RESIST, my friend...RESIST!!!!!

Though I do have to agree with the assessment that waynexes posts are an incredible abuse of the written English language.  Perhaps it's his third language?

It just ain't that hard to hit the "CAP" key once in a while, preferably at the beginning of a sentence; and to throw in a little punctuation, like a period, preferably at the end.

Oh, and the return key, formerly the "return carriage" key to all of us old enough to have used a typewriter, can help separate random thoughts into decipherable and well-presented ideas.

Try these....

with you in regards to the "really bi".  That one in particular has bugged me for a long time and have often been tempted to start a thread on it.  First, how would you have a clue if you met her on a one-on-one?  Get my interview pad out and ask questions? (I get into enough trouble asking too many questions.)  Second, how are we to know if she is REALLY bi?  Isn't the point to us guys the question as to if she does doubles?  Bi acts included or not.  And if they are done, does it matter if she is "really bi" or just performing?  You get points for your sexual orientation rather than the performance?  This is by far the silliest criteria and one any lady can lie about to a guy to bump the score.  Point is, they shouldn't have too.  A lady that blows me away (and yes blows me) would be rated higher if she is bi?  Just makes no sense to me.  If she offers doubles, than add that to the criteria instead.  How about extra points if they do couples?  I mean, if being bi matters, isn't that an interest item to the few (and lucky) others of us that might play as a couple?  I just do not get this particular score item.

Oh no, an entire, first name, in all caps.  Don't let, this,  happen to, you.

in favor of a set of descriptors for performance / experience and a simple comment on the accuracy of the lady's website pics....

tastes on appearance differ so much as to make a numerical rating useless

and

not everyone wants or gets the same experience every time with any given lady. So comparing them in a hard numerical fashion makes no sense....

The problem with that is some reviews lack so much in details that it would be difficult to rate a performance without the #'s.
One hobbyist may conclude by reading a review that it was a 9 performance when the reviewer intended an 7 8 or a 10. I want to know how the reviewer rated her.
Having a review with #'s only and nothing written is even worse.
I think it is far better having both.

IE keep the narrative and details / commentary but use descriptors (I'm not talking about one set of descriptors here but several sets designed to draw out the nuance...). And do away with appearance ratings as previously described.

maybe the reviews should just be self explanatory let each reviewer make up his own mind, plus each lady should be allowed as many reviews as the reviwer sees her.why not, the rating system basically makes na lot of good sense,but there are flaws, i think most people would agree.i believe the more reviews a provider gets in a time span oretty much says it all.of course there going to differ, considering chemistry, hygiene,etc.

just so they can get the higher performance score.

there's nothing wrong with the way ter does the performance score, but most people confuse it as being a score on the quality of the performance instead of the quantity of services offered in her performance.

You would have to be more specific when you state descriptors, or set some examples.
The appearance ratings are not as important, unless you have blurred photos and shots of busts, and legs only. With clear facial photos, and full body shots I agree that some of the appearance #'s can go into the trash.

You tried to give out many 10's.  You have had many "once in a lifetime" experiences.  While I don't agree with the scale 100%, it seems like maybe you score the ladies a little high?

I can see your point, however there have been many threads complaining that guys don't know how to use the numbers. Example being one guy saw a lady and gave her an 8 and the next saw her expecting an 8(his version of an 8) and was disappointed and gave the same lady a 6. Of course this goes for appearance not performance.

I personally find the whole numbers rating system like grade school and like being a side of beef and being stamped with a number. Just one woman's POV. Tons love being rated and find it exciting...more power!!!

No disrespect towards guys who review and need them. Each to his own.

Although I did give it serious consideration.

Appearance -- "one in a million". If taken literally, that would be, what, one of the 50 most beautiful women between 20 and 35 in the entire US?  (Not just providers.) I considered it, but didn"t want to sound like I was wildly exaggerating. Of course, if taken literally, none of the providers might qualify.

Performance -- given the rules, as you point out, max of 9 allowed.

*sigh*  All one can do is try to include descriptive comments in the review itself.