Does it seem to anyone else that this review could have been by Julienne?  Julienne is tomcat101's only review, the writing style sounds like a chick and the review is very self-serving.

As far as the review of Julienne by tomcat101, there are many high rated reviews of Julienne by more than a dozen reviewers.  Quite a few of those reviewers have 10+ reviews.  Please don't be cynical.

...maybe if she had not had any reviews or at least not any recent reviews or if her other reviews gave dramatically lower ratings you may have had a point.  But she has recent reviews and her reviews are generally good...just because a provider gets a glowing review doesn't mean she wrote it.  Jeez, and I thought I was a cynic.

This really should have been posted in LA.  I checked the review and can see why it would raise suspicion but it looks like the user is legit.

-- Staff

I don't believe Provider has to have few or negative reviews to be guilty of posting their own reviews. It's an often used ploy rven by the most highly reviewed. Since a new review puts that Provider at the top of the list....Thus more exposure....I know you all would like to believe only the bad Providers would do this kind of self-serving thing....t'aint so..Remember this is a business....could this be a case of looking with your dick instead of seeing the obvious. If a review has references to "my penis", "climax",and over-sell on services, with only one review in the basket....chances are 10+ Provider or not it's a plant...Not a cynic, just a realist.....