What do you think?  Blur face? Put fake name and bam! You know if you can or not!

END OF MESSAGE

I have no idea what you're talking about.  How are you going to get a picture of a guy?  Why in the world would he give it to you, trusting you to blur it or doing that himself?  And how does it help you to have a blurred photo with a fake name?  Why would any guy want to book with someone having judgment as bad as yours?

This is an Illegal business. That's why everyone worrying about the cops.

Here's my pic

END OF MESSAGE

Like these?

See a guy first in order to know if you can have paid sex with him, then you're still an amateur, not a professional, and I think for us hobbyists, it would show up in the rest of the service accordingly.  

I hope I never see shoes like that in real life.  :shudder:

END OF MESSAGE

Latin and Gibberish in school, I never thought I would get a chance to use either.   Lol

... why a provider might ask for a pic during screening.  For example, I know of cases where a provider was being stalked and asked for photos for awhile.  I wouldn't call that action ameteurish.  

To describe 'Adonis' and myself is Greek.  And no, I am not referring to ethnicity.

Read her post.  She didn't say anything about stalkers, only that she needed to see a photo to know if she wanted to see them.  A pro wouldn't say that. If it what you suggest, she would have phrased the questions that way, i.e., is it okay to ask for a photo if you have a stalker problem.  Don't make shit up that she didn't say.  She said what she said.  

Here you go.

... In which you made a generalization based on very little info. In the absence of info, multiple interpretations are possible... not just negative interpretations like the one you came up with.

END OF MESSAGE

She just wants to make sure you're not a famous astronaut.  Another possibility about as dumb as yours.  

 
If your screening checks out, she's already going to know you're NOT her stalker, so while there may be other "possible" reasons, I don't think yours is one of them.  It's most likely what I said, that she's just not mature and professional enough to have sex with a customer that she wouldn't be attracted to in RL. That makes her not much of a professional.

Asking for a pic to avoid certain individuals is defintely a real scenario, as I know providers who've done it.   If you want to call someone a liar, you'd better bring proof.

It's clear that you can't conceive of a woman being mature and professional, but also someone who wants to have as much fun as possible with her clients and thus is selective.  I'm not saying that's where the OP is at, because we really don't know.  But I know a provider who screens for a specific body type, and she's very mature and professional.  And picky.

On a dumb post?  If a hooker has a stalker, she knows who it is.  If a new customer is screened properly, she will KNOW it's not her stalker, so asking for a photo could NOT be for that reason. You're a little dense, but I'm trying to work with you.  If I go slow enough I think you'll eventually get it.

... every possible situation that might cause a provider to ask for a pic as part of screening, other than your reason that she'll only see guys who turn her on--and thus she's unprofessional.

Here's an except from a TER post (not by me) from earlier this year, just so you realize there's more than one possible reason for a provider asking for a pic:

"We seem to find new experiences to enjoy during each visit.  She mentioned that a stalker threat that required her to ask for a selfie pic from new clients, has been resolved, and is back to normal screening."

FWIW I know this provider, and she's very experienced and professional... and very highly rated.  

Have a good rest of the day.  Feel free to continue your ad hominem attacks to your heart's content.  

knew everything?   I just said, given the screening element, your post was stupid.  If you don't think it is, then explain how a stalker is going to get past the screening where a photo becomes necessary as a final firewall.  I say if it gets to that point, then the screening wasn't proper.  A proper screening eliminates stalkers.  

Duh

-- Modified on 10/12/2017 4:38:30 AM

Actually, no.  Blurring represents loss of information.  There's no way to recover it.

I agree with souls harbor on this. Good blurring is very difficult if not impossible to undo. In the movies, the CSI techs can do it in 20 seconds by pressing the "unblur" button but the real world don't work that way. Gov agencies might be able to combine data from huge databases to try to recover images, but I doubt that Joe Schmoe in his parents' basement is going to do that.