Forget physical appearance as a major criteria... beautiful women are everywhere. Dime a dozen. But most providers I've met are strong, intelligent (no education debate, please - that is not what I mean by intelligent), funny, down to earth, independent. I like those qualities in women. And we'd have to "click", of course. So maybe 20% - 25%.
In this scenario, I think it is the ultimate in hypocrisy that providers would be prejudiced against hobbyists because they are hobbyists, or for hobbyists to be prejudiced against providers because they are providers. We're all the ones fucking for money, both of us sides of the same coin. If you like someone, tell them. If they like you too, go on a damn date if you want to. That's it. You work the other shit out as you need to, just like any other people dating have to do - maybe it's only harder if you hold onto that prejudice and the societal programming we all get about how "awful" what we all do is, and how we "should" be. I think that is a "shouldy" way of life, and I never moved one step forward in life by doing what everyone else thought I "should" do. Crap. sorry. Didn't mean to get all preachy. "bitch slap" me if you must. Gotta go back to work.just curious. I know that in this business providers don't get to pick and chose the men they see, so they end up with a few princes and a lot of frogs . ladies, what percentage of your clients would actually date if you were not involved in escorting?
It has nothing to do with them being a prince or a frog, but the fact that I would have met him this way. Sorry, but I would never fall for a client who paid me to fk him. Never have, never will. If we are going by guys I have met and found attractive... about 30 percent.
COMPLETELY AGREE. I also agree on 30% of my clients I've found attractive.
most of you misunderstood what I was asking. not would you date a client. but if you meet this guy in the civilian world (work, party, club) and your were not an escort would you date him or even give him a second look ??
oh wait. I can't say that yet. LOL
that I am a dream date and how come I am not taken ..
but you know .. i do not like 95 % of men in this country - i mean not a sex..is the best .. Russian women and american dogs are the best match for pussy licking and ass fucking
love your sex .. but that about it ..
I not taken because do not want to belong some grey boring bad lover full of misconception man
I better be lover to may nice
but OOO yes ... they want to date ... just then they stop donate as they do when we escorting .. so .. nope ..
I just would not go as an most women( not all ) calcite each addtional 30 min on dollars
given he loves talk dance listen music and share things.. i zoo enjoy time together .. but i do not want let him tell me what to do
so ..like that
by the way .. I took video in the snow one part of video is Iam in snow in bathing suite
it is interesting and one candidate to BF took this movie.. but .. what when we go out - it is free of charge as to sex ... ..
may be once ??
free?? if he proved himself well before with donations and care ? and fun ?
Some of us do pick and chose who we see. Did you really think we HAVE to see anyone that contacts us? Lol
To answer your question though, I met my SO as a client and we have been dating for 5 years. There are several others I would've considered dating as well. It is a low percentage(probably around 30% for me too) however I do have many I care about
I do have one I talk to weekly and yes we always say we love each other before hanging up. He is and always will be very special to me. I have no problem with the fact they paid for pussy because hey I sell it! Lol
Damn if I could just keep all the cocks though I'd have a drawer full of BFs lol
Hugs and kisses
TL
-- Modified on 2/4/2014 4:23:20 AM
Respect. Humor. Honesty. Very cool
If we were looking for suitable LTR material, what percentage of gals we see would we seriously consider, all things considered?
I'd say somewhere around 20%. Questions of temperament and personality are what I look at the most.
(That's not considering the issue of the gal's profession, to keep things simple enough.)
Maybe a bit higher than 20%, probably more like 33%, now if we are talking about all hookers out there, or even all hookers on TER, that number probably shrinks to about 1 or 2%
Funny thing, I probably end up "dating" or at least having one "date" with about 1 or 2% of the ladies I meet this way.
As for the OP, I've been to many M&G's and I would say that even Cosette's number of one in 15 is most likely a high number. i would never date the female equivalent of 99% of the "hobbyists" I have met, especially considering that over 80% of them are admitted cheaters, about the same percentage don't pass the "not repulsive" test, and as Rod said, most of them are over sixty, Not a real great dating pool IMO.
It's funny, I own a mirror, and I know I will never be on the cover of GQ magazine, but I do find it a bit ego boosting to get that "look of relief" when a gal opens the door to meet me for the first time. Many of you will know to what I refer, the rest of you most likely don't pass that "not repulsive" test. lmao
Looks, intelligence, poise, humor, temperament, compatibility, attitude. She's got to be able to laugh, because if I'm for them as a LTR partner, I'll give her more than enough Manginic stuff to laugh at.
Since were all hanging in this cash-driven world of fantasy, it's fun to let the imagination run free for a moment. There's a few I'd consider sailing off into the sunset with, and others that we'll be finding out soon enough
Forget physical appearance as a major criteria... beautiful women are everywhere. Dime a dozen. But most providers I've met are strong, intelligent (no education debate, please - that is not what I mean by intelligent), funny, down to earth, independent. I like those qualities in women. And we'd have to "click", of course. So maybe 20% - 25%.
In this scenario, I think it is the ultimate in hypocrisy that providers would be prejudiced against hobbyists because they are hobbyists, or for hobbyists to be prejudiced against providers because they are providers. We're all the ones fucking for money, both of us sides of the same coin. If you like someone, tell them. If they like you too, go on a damn date if you want to. That's it. You work the other shit out as you need to, just like any other people dating have to do - maybe it's only harder if you hold onto that prejudice and the societal programming we all get about how "awful" what we all do is, and how we "should" be. I think that is a "shouldy" way of life, and I never moved one step forward in life by doing what everyone else thought I "should" do.
Crap. sorry. Didn't mean to get all preachy. "bitch slap" me if you must. Gotta go back to work.
Some time ago a number of providers defended the idea of dating a guy and expecting him to be true to them whilst they go off and ply their trade.
I guess you might say that the gals consider themselves the same as actors who under guise of employment feel it is fine to portray a criminal, but expect people in the real world to not be criminals. I know that analogy has more holse in it than the Albert Hall, but that's their position and they were sticking to it.
and I won't judge it either... a date is not a relationship. Sometimes you can work things out, and sometimes you can't. Some are polyamorous, polygamous, swingers; one-sided or on both sides. So long as it works for them and they are moving forward happily - I wish them well.
.she and I liked enjoying the same activities but there was never a chance in hell that it could have been a LTR from either side and we both recognized it.. we managed to keep business transaction compartmentalized from the social interaction for the most part.. that little episode is over now and was enjoyable as hell while it lasted..
..long story short.. percentage I would consider for LTR would be zero..
..if I found another hooker that shared the same interests and was ok with exploring them together, I'd jump all over it again knowing the outcome would probably be the same.. eventual self destruction of the relationship.
I have to think that guys repeat and continue to become regulars with a provider because they either get
1.) reliably very good semi-anonymous sex or they get
2.) reliably very good less-anonymous sex and like being with the lady even between rounds even when not sexually engaged.
Ladies, why do you think you have regulars and what percentage of your clients are regulars