just casually wondering if others had litmus test as to rule in or rule out a lady ... for me ..  Very rare to meet someone smaller than D, having more than 100 reviews or under 29 yr old.  (unless the 27 yr old has a DDD chest  LOL kidding)  

I look at is to see if they are on P411.  If they’re not I immediately move on.

Service menu/looks vs price

I am good with just about anybody as long as they are not old, fat, ugly, or  a trannie.  I have friends in all four of these categories, but they are not the kind of friends I have sex with.   You could say I have no prejudices when it comes to women, but my dick does.   Lol

I start with a picture that gives me a boner. It could be due to a pose, general looks, some reminder of a past infatuation, etc. Then I filter by price and review.

No gordas, no feas, y no viejas.  

1) Am I attracted to her?
2) Are we a good match? (personality, services offered, etc)
3) Can I afford her?
4) Can I verify her?
5) Is her verification method inside my comfort zone?

I look for a flat, fit tummy, narrow hips (or anything but something one might call womanly or wide hips) great BBBJ skills and the willingness to at least attempt to handle a magnum. The ability to handle a pretty active two hour session is also a requirement.  

Heh, the politically correct should find the most repulsive person they can to have sex with. Of course they never do.  Because it's all about virtue signaling, not about actually doing anything.

Never pay more than $300 for a hooker.

How else could you fuck up what I said about not remembering paying over a certain price into it being a hard and fast rule of mine.

I don't believe in political correctness in fantasies. That's the point right? Is to act out some shit while  inside so you don't do something stupid while outside, so to speak.

1. Am I sexually attracted to her? (usually go for curvy + providers with big tits but I’ve been sexually attracted to non curvy providers and or providers that don’t have big tits)

She and a friend would go shopping at Costco and would try to find the most repulsive member of the opposite sex for their friend to have sex with. The winner found the one who was clearly SO repulsive her counterpart had to agree she'd rather die than fuck that person. It usually involved someone morbidly obese in Spandex.

and furthermore, attractiveness is only part of the equation.  

and yes while attractiveness really is only part of the equation, it's a REALLY large part as far as I am concerned. lol

shopping, but where I live, affordability is not a factor unless they are physically attractive. I have yet to see a provider that is part of the "all shapes and sizes" market that was not completely affordable.   Its the ones that are DDG with perfect dimensions that push the price up. I agree that attitude and personality are also things I look for, but I don't even get to these unless I find her physically attractive in the first place.

on the flip side, pierced nipples have, to date, been a deal breaker.

Who hijacked your account and posted these?

I recently found out that P411 ok's are no guarantee with some ladies.

...main litmus test that i always demand....that the provider im seeing.....IS a woman.....i love small tits btw

It was all about who could gross out the other worse. Whilst ridiculing others. Such bad people.

Natural firm breasts, definitely no to the pancakes. Must have TER review or somebody recommended. Occasionally, I'll TOFTT, but pretty much stopped that during the pandemic when the issue wasn't service, but looks. Before, especially with K-agency girls, you'd get - at minimum - a fairly attractive K-girl and the issue would be service. But, it became pretty bad with fat, ugly, and old providers in the K-agency/K-girl scene, that I abandoned that practice.

...attraction has to be the first item on the list.

must be a woman ?!?!?!?  you are very selective .. you just ruled out 50% of the population !   how can you be so snobby  LOL    

By services (I hate the term menu lol), are you looking at our TER profiles or our websites? I only ask because for those of us based in the US there's a fine line we have to walk compared. From what I recall, and the advice passed down from other providers, unlike our colleagues in places like Australia and Canada, it's a bit of a legal faux pas to have our exact services listed our on our websites.

Agree 100%! Any lady that will suck on a stinky, lubed up piece of latex is a NO go for me.

You can't find a nice trex lady who is GFE and can provide BBBJ w/o neutering you with razor sharp teeth?
.
Is this you? Or a relative?
http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph60106322abc08
.
Is this why your species is almost extinct? Too much time boinking humans and not producing fertile T-Rex offspring?
.
At least you'll go extinct with a smile on your face.

Add in P411 and some great reviews and you got it!

I too love Lucy Milano

Yeah, those foot-long razor sharp teeth the size of railroad spikes are a bit of a deterrent to enjoyable oral fun.

But before I almost exclsuively went for Asian agencies because most accept anonymity...  

1. no tatoo
2. no silicon
3. no short hair, boy cut or bald head
4. not fat
5. less than 30 yrs
6. cute face
7. minimum 2 positive reviews in the past month