too bad there isn't a way to review or network about Sugar Babies like those on seeking or benefits.    they have profiles but you have to join the site to access so can't link.     yes many are part time and try to be discreet but not all.  

Read my website it’s called an arrangement. I have 1 now & always do. We are all not the same. I prefer to entertain a small circle of friends. I don’t need likes. 👍🏽  
Friends with benefits is the ideal situation for me. I don’t waste my time dating for free on those bs sites.

We discuss this.  We rarely discuss the profiles of girls since they are not pros.  However, some of us have had to call out some hardcore scammers to ward the rest of us off them.

I really would like to find a sugar daddy but I haven't been able to find one that really worth it. It doesn't help me if half of my bills aren't even being covered..

While there can be overlap, I wouldn't call a Sugar Baby and Arrangement with a provider exactly the same thing. There is certainly overlap, and depending on the situation the lines can be blurred.

Is that a thing?

Most are in the 300-500 range per date.  But, you are buying dinner/drinks/etc.  This is different than escorting, you are spending time together like a normal date.  

I think the ones that openly say what they offer is a sugar baby arrangement, tend to be looking for a higher end experience. I really doubt a lady will make a conscious decision to be a sugar baby and target a middle class arrangement.

I have had two clients so far leave "sugar babies" on the wayside for the very simple reason they were not getting laid. So yes, if you are looking for the GF experience this is it!
All jokes aside when you enter into this arrangement you need to be VERY specific as to what you are looking for. When you hire an escort pretty up front as to what you are paying for. Sugar baby, not so much.  
My absolute favorite was my gent who was making the car payment for his "sugar baby" for a long time and when he questioned why they had not had sex in months she screamed "I AM NOT A HOOKER!!" Me thinks he was expecting a bit more for $900 a month than two lunch dates that he also footed the bill for.....

in terms of a traditional relationship between men and women to these women.  I suppose we can chalk it up to declining education and particularly poor exposure to classical literature.

The only difference seems to be that with a professional, expectations and boundaries are pre-determined and mutually agreed upon.

You missed the part that you’re not paying a sugar baby a fee. You’re buying her stuff and/or covering expenses.

300-500 range for a dinner date that ends in quality time? Isn't that just called an "escorting dinner date" (for ladies in that range)? 🤔

-- Modified on 8/1/2025 2:20:30 AM

Based *solely* on my nominal experience, guys who want a sugarbaby are just cheap clients with fragile egos and poor communication skills. They don't want an actual relationship (intimacy, ACK! vulnerability, ACK! accountability, ACK!), but also they don't want to feel as though they are paying for sex (fragile egos need to think they're wanted for more than their wallet, even though that's the only thing they are offering). They essentially want a FWB scenario while putting as little emotional and financial skin in the game as possible. They are phenomenal boundary pushers, unreliable and entitled, petulant little fucks.

But you nailed it. At least for some guys.

I would imagine this may be a type and there are other types out there. But I also admit I have actually done either so wtf do I know.

90% are escorts. They just want a friendlier term.

Can't tell at all what your opinion on the subject is.

I’m not sure how your arrangements have worked but there’s a term called “pay per meet”, in which a rate is set and provided every time you meet. Would that not be a fee for companionship?

SBs are more like escorts in the legal sense. Escorting involves providing companionship and social interaction.

Oh darlin', the stories we could swap!😂  And I prefer "zesty" or "spicy"... I might even go with "sassy" at times 😇😘

Oh I agree that there are all kinds of 'types' out there. I was speaking of personal experience.

Pay per meet sounds like a fee a provider would charge. If a Sugar Baby is using that, she is bluring the lines and what she is providing is becomming more formulaized. It's possible some do this, as I am not a researched expert on the topic. But the Sugar Babies I have seen act like girlfriends, and can even be considered girlfriends. They don't see multiple guys, though I'm sure some secretly step out. It's often not formulized, but it's clear the guy showers them with money. He wines and dines them, takes them shopping, and/or covers expenses. He may even hand over a credit card or cash for her to go shopping. It tends to be less formal than an arrangement, but it's clear she's getting what she wants. But he's not handing her money for a specified amount of time. In fact, if he even suggested it, she might get pissed and say, "I'm not a hooker." Kind of ironic since what she is doing is not so much different.

And I don't doubt your personal narrative at all. That said, I don't think the vast number of men who seek out a sugar baby are "just cheap clients with fragile egos and poor communication skills." This lifestyle has changed greatly in the last few years, and gents with needs are simply exploring other options to meet those needs.  
.
With some, the financial challenge of the seemingly never ending price increases in recent years, has caused them to look "outside the box" so to speak. I, for one, am exploring those same possibilities with likeminded women who don't come from the TER style of escorting. I have yet to dip my toe into the sugar baby pool, lol, but I certainly cant rule it out either.  
.
If I do so, that wouldn't be me, or others, being "cheap." It would be an attempt to continue to have human, physical contact and intimacy, while doing so in a manner that doesn't cause a calamitous, fiscal hardship.  
.
But again, I fully acknowledge that you may had vastly differing, negative experiences and I am quite sorry to hear about those.

The scenario you describe sounds lovely; I'm glad that's been your personal experience! And that's why the devil being in the details was my subject line. It's not about what a scenario is called but about how it's walked out in real life.  

How can it be?  

1) I said that in my experience it was the prospective SDs that are cheap, entitled, petulant fucks NOT those seeking arrangements (whether on the site by that name or otherwise).
.

Rob and Rocket make good points. 10 days with a certain big poster on the boards is 20k. That's 60k for a month, maybe that gets discounted to 50k since it's longer. A year, at a discount, is 1/2 a mil. And, you're paying for meals, clothes, and other gifts during this time. Obviously, you got to be rich to drop this kind of dime.

There's usually more than one truth in situations like this and I find a lot to agree with in Edrienne's comments, as well as Robert's and others.  

Perhaps  the  "Review  Network"  you're  seeking  is  "TER"?

i was thinking more along the lines of a blue collar gal or a working college student who needs to get her head above water, but doesn’t want to be a full blown escort…an arrangement like me paying her utilities, cell phone, gas, and car expenses in exchange for some “bedroom fun” a few times a month, no strings or expectations attached, and either side can terminate at will

except cops are not going to setup a sting to catch her sugar daddy

That is a large portion of sugar babies.  They like the idea of dating an established guy who takes her to dinner and knows how to have sex.  

You gotta change the color combos (font/background) your engagements section.

No one is spending 10k a month.  It's more like 2-3k for a date every weekend

No one is going to replace your full time escort income to be their sugar baby.  So calling guys cheap for not doing that is incorrect.  It's a question of value.

False. You may not. Others may not. But no one? A date every weekend? I’m sure if it’s just a date every weekend it’s less. But some are getting a lot more than that. 2k-3k is just enough to cover rent, if not a little short, in big expensive cities. If you have a Sugar Baby getting only that much, she obviously needs other sources of income. And I’m sure that’s what some do. But some have a Sugar Daddy that covers most if not all of their expenses. Like many things, there is diversity among how Sugar Babies operate and the price tag.

2-3k a month. Not a date.  Are there girls getting 10k?  Maybe.  But even ultra rich guys I know who can afford that are not willing to pay it.  At least not long term.  

I imagine a guy who makes a conscious decision to seek out what both he and she consider a Sugar Baby arrangement, is more likely in the category you mentioned, the 2k-3k variety. To me, this is blurring the lines and closer to an arrangement that an escort can also provide. It’s just managed differently.

That's pretty much it.  A SB is a GF.  Or someone you date.  She's being supported.  But there's chemistry and some emotional connection.