I do offer a meet and greet option (I request $100 + the cost of dinner/coffee/lunch etc.) I still require screening info. It is more to see if we are compatible, not in lieu of screening. I do not ask for a deposit and I do not ask for cancelation fees, but screening is always required. I have been doing this for 11 years. I live in the middle of Wisconsin and every gent that sees me has to send me his info. If guys try to tell you that providers are not requiring screening info they are lying. When I am available I am constantly booked and often have a wait list for cancellations.
Question for the community: is it safe to meet for small meet and greet in lieu of verification? I am finding a lot of men refuse to give screening information and instead are suggesting meet-n-greet as verification. When did this become a thing? Is it safe?? TIA
I know an escort who charges a fee to do a m&g screening waiver.
For everyone to be safe, verification is needed before the Meet & Greet. Our host who hosted two of them per year, one in Orlando and one in Tampa, requires that she vettes you. Doesn't have to be real world information but she has a process. Additionally, she charges the gentleman $100 to pay for the function. She has the party catered with an open bar. Of course, you may do it differently such as just meeting at a restaurant and everyone pays for themselves. But prudence is required to make everyone safe and feel comfortable.
it came from the sugar world. A meet-n-greet is a very common first encounter in a potential sugar baby relationship.
You didn't define "verification." If that means real ID then you need to understand that many clients will refuse. If you mean references or P411 likes, I'd be very cautious if the client couldn't produce anything. That said, a coffee house, during the day seems pretty safe and you can still say no to taking things behind closed doors.
I’ve seen it listed as an option but no it isn’t safe in my humble opinion. Say you meet someone at Starbucks and he seems like a great guy, you feel safe, etc. Then behind closed doors he becomes violent. What recourse do you have? Assuming you’re comfortable with calling the police to report the violent act your only option is to what? Request they pull security footage from Starbucks or your hotel in an attempt to identify him?
Meet and greets, “FaceTime”, deposits, etc are all very poor screening options.
There is never a guarantee of safety. Someone could show you a passport which is the gold standard for ID. But it could be counterfeit.
Unlikely to yield good results.
From the player's perspective, without reviews a meeting would only confirm your looks, not your bona files.
From the provider's perspective, the fact that I'm polite and charming in a public setting won't provide much assurance that I'm not a bully and a thief in private.
I do offer a meet and greet option (I request $100 + the cost of dinner/coffee/lunch etc.) I still require screening info. It is more to see if we are compatible, not in lieu of screening. I do not ask for a deposit and I do not ask for cancelation fees, but screening is always required. I have been doing this for 11 years. I live in the middle of Wisconsin and every gent that sees me has to send me his info. If guys try to tell you that providers are not requiring screening info they are lying. When I am available I am constantly booked and often have a wait list for cancellations.
The very first provider I met didn't screen - she met me in a public place and looked at my driver's license - didn't photographic it or write down any info from it - just looked at it. As far as I know she still operates the same way. I met her in a Taco Bell and we chatted while she ate a potato burrito. She was certainly a character.
I was good with that at the time because I felt comfortable with being able to get to the location early to scour the area for possible trouble (PD vehicles, etc). Nowadays, I don't think I'd be comfortable with doing it that way.
years ago trolling for no-strings sex and that's the way every introduction goes. You meet at a public place, usually a restaurant, have lunch, and if you're both agreeable you meet at a local hotel anywhere from 30 minutes later to a few days. Got a lot of free pussy, but stopped after a year because almost every woman I me either lied about their weight, their age, or both.
I found AM to be nothing but a scam. I'd get PMs at 3am saying "I just saw you on and tried to chat but you logged out". I was never on at 3am or anywhere close to that. Just a bot trying to get me to PM her back so I'd get charged for it.
annoyance, but I still did okay there. I was early 50's but I'm a gym rat, so I had the kind of body MILFs wanted but were not getting from their husbands. Did you notice as your account balance came down, the bot activity from "house" accounts increased to encourage you to top up your account? There was occasional drama with some of the women who were looking to "trade up" permanently to a new man, but for the most part, no-strings sex was just what I needed at that point in my life. As I transitioned into P4P, I found it to be even more straightforward and actually quit AM with a few hundred bucks still in the account. With all of the fake accounts, it got to be a time-suck for me.
Ashley Madison was about 10:1 guys to women. The ratio flips on sugar sites because chicks are getting paid, whereas on Ashley Madison they mostly were giving it away for free. So why go there when they can earn cash and prizes on a sugar site.
I was on AM for awhile advertising as a working gal. That lasted about a month or so until I got the boot from their site. I still got a couple of good clients from it though!!
And there were many women who were using it as SB platform. That always came out in the initial "lunch" meeting, so a man could make an informed decision knowing where she was coming from.
I just advertised up front in messages. Pretty obvious they were reading all of the "private" messages because I highly doubt any dude was going to rat me out.
..."nice guy at the coffee shop has a torture dungeon in his basement" type stories to ever trust anyone, lol. But in all seriousness, with all of the misogynist lunatics running around in the world, an m&g to me would never pass as a true vetting. Psychopaths can wear the prettiest and most convincing smiles 
First impression Bundy was handsome, intelligent, personable, and persuasive. In the end, he confessed to brutally killing 30 women, while authorities believe the actual number to be much higher. Good Meet-and-Retreat material.
"screening" info they are uncomfortable giving. Men are permitted to have boundaries, just as the ladies are.
"Verification" usually benefits the guy, although I can see where a short (paid) meeting in public might be fine for him to "Verify" you and for you to see his ID and ensure he is who he says he is.
I do not think "verification" is a substitute for screening - which should occur before you meet for anything.
I have had guys ask this instead of giving screening info as well but I will not do it. If they are not comfortable sending what I ask for screening there is always someone else they can go see.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
