Well there are now two threads dedicated to Miss Kathy, and instead of replying to each I'll just make this one post covering all my thoughts on the "Kathy Conundrum".
I should also preface this post by saying that referrences to "she" or "her" in regard to "Miss Kathy" are simply because "she" claims to be a female and I have no proof elsewise.
It's kind of weird, in the time I have been reading these boards, I have seen countless posts that say the same things "Miss Kathy's" posts say...but they never got their own thread, let alone two, dedicated to the authors of those posts.
Perhaps it is because all those posts tend to be made by men. Those posts also didn't get the replies within the threads they were made in the attention that her posts have.
Now, in the first thread dedicated to "Miss Kathy" she is called a streetwalker, a "basic hooker", that she has a pimp, and "a whore like her"...interesting, to me, that clients that frequent ladies in this business still see fit to denigrate on some class system. That does give pause to wonder how many wonderful ATF "providers" are simply an unagreed with opinion away from being just an object...that object being a whore.
If a lady insists that she loves her time with a given client and that they have a special connection she is a provider, an escort, an ATF...if she gives indication that the special connection is that he pays her she is a whore a basic hooker...
One poster even said in that first thread,
QUOTE:"negativity this "person" spews hardly makes her qualify as a person."
So, if a lady says she wouldn't see her clients if they weren't paying her she is barely human?
Because, that is the main gist of all the "negative" posts by "Miss Kathy": That she and her clients have a good time, not because she loves them, or has a special connection with them, or because they "turn her on" but because they pay her to have a good time....and that makes her hardly qualify as being a person?
(quick aside: I have seen a couple posts that I would be reticent to call the posters actions "human", but those were one where a guy wanted to know the best way to slip his SO an antibiotic to treat an STD he gave her, puting her health and life at risk so he wouldn't get caught playing around. The other was a guy whose wife, after puting on a negligee [which he saw as a tease, because we all know women never wear nice things because they like them, but only so that her husband's dick will get hard] suggested he masturbate, and he got right to the edge of climax and then went into the bedroom and used his "tastey bitch" wife, mother of children, as a cum rag...and was quite proud of himself for doing so.)
It would seem that the only thing that makes inhuman whores people and providers is that they like each client more than all others (oh, and if you can't do the math on that one, it's OK...because that equation can't be done).
Now, I have argued before that I don't believe ladies are in this "just for the money" to my mind (though my mind is questionable at best) this is far to intimate (if even only physically) and, to some extent, vulnerable a business to have money be the only reason to do it. Now, the other reasons? they are, I am sure, as many and as varied as the ladies in this business.
The thing that strikes me most about the "Miss Kathy" posts and threads are the guys replying to them, and how they are replying. When a guy makes a post saying the same things guys don't come out of the woodwork to argue that the providers they see "get wet", or give them so much extra time, or tell them things they tell no other client, or share so much of themselves...all of a sudden it is supposedly a "provider" saying it's the money and the guys have to defend why it's not...what's the difference in who bears the message?
If the message is so wrong, why argue it? Why attempt to duhumanise and denigrate her? it only gives her and her posts more attention, and her more reason to reply and say more of what it is that those replying find so objectionable.
If they fear perhaps she isn't wrong...if they fear that she may be telling the truth, that all the ladies that assured them that they were special might have been lying, that they "get wet" not because they turn them on so much as it is a autonomic response, etc...why argue?
Only reason to argue that I can think of, right now, is that they're not trying to convince Miss Kathy, they're trying to convince themselves.
When it's another guy saying such things they can write it off as that being his experience, but with them, when they are with providers, it's different it isn't just the money...for him maybe, but not for them.
But, if it is a provider that is purported to have said it, then they have room to doubt exactly how special they are, because what if that really is how their ATFs thinks of them? What if the extra time is just about keeping a customer? What if she really isn't turned on by them? What if all their insecurities aren't just psychological demons but flesh and blood facts?
Here's the thing...it doesn't matter.
This is, by far, the easiest and most straight forward relationship anyone can ever have in this life.
You want certain activities, the illusion that you have that hot GF who wants you, and that time spent in your company is a joy and desired.
She, in exchange for specific remunirations is willing to give you all of that.
It's clear, it's simple and it's straight forward...and whether or not it's "real" doesn't matter.
The irony of it all is that guys will read the TER reviews, have a shopping list of acronyms, and will look at pictures as if they are forensic scientists looking for crime scene clues of airbrushing, or any photoshop trickery, or how if she has her picture taken with her arms behind her head it means her breatsts sag...or any number of things...then they will compare that to her price and doing a cost / benefit comparison analysis, will determine if she is worthy of seeing....but DoC forbid if the lady does anything less than make the same guy, that qualified and quantified everything about her physical appearance and sexual abilities, think that he is the best lover, most special client and most intimate physically, emotionally or whatnot experience she has had...because then apparently she is barely a person and a whore.
Most of the ladies I have had occassion to talk with do like their clients, some because they are good behind closed doors, some because they are charming, some handsome, some funny, some sweet, some smart, some kind, some for all those reasons and more, etc. They generally can find something they like in each, but that doesn't necessarily mean they would see any of them if they weren't being paid to do so.
For every "Kathy of 48th Street" post there are ten posts by guys saying the same thing, and for each of those there are posts by guys sure their ATF is in love with them, or that will refer to his ATFs throughout the years as "girlfriends" even though he always paid them, and talk of his "relationships" with them.
The truth, most likely, lies somewhere in the middle, for the ladies this is their work, so they want to get paid, but they do probably like the majority of their clients, just maybe not in the way the clients want to, hope to, or think they are liked.