A few threads down, I asked for advice about a provider I just saw who is pregnant (and who didn't mention it to me beforehand).  I also asked for advice about mentioning it in my review.  The near-unanimous opinion was that I should mention it, so I did.

I have seen many reviews on pregnant providers. I guess it depends on who is reviewing the review. I think it should be allowed. Rewrite it and say she had a huge belly, and didn't look like the picture.

Try again or contact the mod back who did not approve it. Reference these threads.

Saying you did doubles with her and she brought along an underage not fully developed minor.  That would be bad.  I wonder if you're allowed to say she had a prosthetic eye and said she really enjoyed the experience and told you she'd keep an eye out for you if you chose to call again? Is that too personal?

I'm with PS. Big belly. Not like pictures.

Much heavier than you expected and it looked like she swallowed a basketball....  I think we would get what you meant...

Fresh Turkey in the oven.
I thought she was just fat but she wasnt.

Or give her a 10/10. Those reviews seemingly enjoy very little oversight!

I had a review up from several years ago of a pregnant provider, but when I went to look for it, it was gone.

Anything that affects physical appearance should be fair game.  It's not like we are claiming that the person has cancer or something like that.  

Will lactating providers now be subject to being banished?

I'd think that a seriously preggers provider would something that should be known up front.  If I walked into a situation without any up front warning, I'd be pretty upset for wasting my time.

with the new "photos only" board getting started, we might start hearing stuff even dumber before the day is over.

there is no way to contact the TER approver who rejected the review.  Besides, I doubt that admin would let him do it anyway.

fresh turkey in the oven...  I love it!  
I'd be upset.  A provider with a large belly for what ever reason would not be able to do certain expected positions & activities.  I think it should be fair game.

It's just like playing "customer service lottery" when you get one who can't speak English, rather than battling it out with someone who obviously doens't get it. It's often much easer to simply hang up and try again.

What CPA is suggesting is the TER version of hanging up and trying again.

I would not see a pregnant provider! And for you to hide that fact makes you responsible for what may happen.  
And what would that be you ask.. Well we know about BBFS I'm not saying the provider had BBFS with a client but she did go BB with someone. Could be a boyfriend or NOT.  So  by hiding that fact you are hiding the risks associated in seeing her. You take away my ability to make a choice, Of course you will say all reviews are not true, But if that is the case why do you then care what is in them. It is a slippery slope you walk

I guess next the fact that she advertised as Korean but is actually Croatian will be something else we can't reveal in a review.  We're making this too hard guys.

Whatever the "new" policy may be, (and it might just be the specific review reviewer, as I mentioned earlier), there is definitely not a sweep to get rid of the existing preggo reviews.  
In your case maybe the lady delisted.

In search of johns who are seeking that out.  And it's quite common from what I have observed over the years.  

I'm laughing, oh boy, we can't tell anyone that she's sticking out a mile in the belly because it's a double-secret that she's gained 30 lbs. Since when? There are guys who seek out preggo providers so seeing this in a review would actually help her.

You'll be changing diapers if that's your fetish . 2. Instead of treat her right , if you want to bring her something she's registered at babies r us ..3. If you do an all nighter for breakfast you'll get cereal and shell provider the milk ! 4. Whole new meaning to little head as I entered her .! And 5. Sorry this is just WRONG ! UNREAL..so op did she call you grandpa ?guess poppi wasn't appropriate he was the guy before you !  

If you can't mention when a provider is pregnant what else would fall into the same category.   Plus wouldn't this policy encourage pregnant provider to withhold this information as there is no way a hobbiest could disclose the information afterward.

And I see you got the pregnant comment and the BF/pimp/driver comment in.

is now a winner as the review has been approved. it also looks like the OP won his try at Customer Service lottery.

I always contact TER staff multiple times regarding issues that need to be addressed. 25% of the time they change their minds to my stance so there is NO harm in making the effort if you bother to make TWO blogs on it.

Since admin won't allow you to write review on pregnant escort to personal.Give heads up on all boards.Thanks!