Only sperm comes from the testes.  The much larger volume of semen comes from the prostate.  Maybe you should ask the ladies if they've checked prostate size.

Google is your friend...

"Modern physical anthropologists have studied the surprising differences among the genitalia of apes and men to a great extent. These scientists have identified two explanations for this mystery: species that copulate routinely need bigger testes; and promiscuous species in which several males mate frequently with one female need especially large testes (because the male that implants the most semen has the best chance of fertilizing the egg). This is called the Theory of Testis Size."

This study said that human balls (and gorilla and orangutan balls) are 1.5 oz, while chimp balls are 4 oz. The question is, when you talk about one guy having big balls versus another guy, are you really talking about a significant difference in size? So if one guy is 1.5 and another is 1.6, does that make a difference?

I would think the guy with 4oz nuts would have some advantages... but probably has problems finding pants that fit.

Maybe the Scottish were on to something with the kilts...

The only real correllation I've noticed is that a man with larger testes will usually have a much stronger sex drive than one who doesn't....although there are exceptions to the rule, and men with small testes who have something to prove!

I am sure men with smaller testes can reach as many orgasms as anyone else during a sex session, but a man with a powerful sex drive is much more likely to want more than one climax than one whose sex drive isn't as strong.

gosh i love 'em, but unfortunately your drunken theories are incorrect. the size of a man's testicles reveals nothing about his sexuality. about the only thing i've observed regarding testicle size is that there seems to be some vague connection to the deepness of a man's voice. men with smaller balls tend to have higher voices, and men with larger balls tend to have deeper voices...but again those are just my own observations, and i'm certain there are exceptions to this.

because it applies to me, but I never considered the correlation.

I have a deep, baritone voice, and also a very large set of balls.  Which, by the way, is far more of a disadvantage than an advantage.  LIke a girl with huge boobs, I have trouble getting clothes that fit me and am constantly being pulled and tugged the wrong way.  Not fun!  And worse than that, I don't even enjoy it when a woman plays with them, I just get extremely nervous, so there's really no upside.

-- Modified on 10/13/2010 12:53:57 PM

Several years ago, I developed what my urologist called a "spermatocele", basically a blockage.  Lo and behold, it looks just like a third testicle.  So, that is what I tell my intimate friends now, I was born with 3.  I also try to talk with a very deep voice.

Sex drive and thickness of vocal chords (which translates to depth of voice) are both related to testosterone levels. Can we safely assume, then, that size of testicles somehow correlates to testosterone production?

...especially considering two men i know who have actually had their testosterone levels tested (my Husband and a client). my Husband, with very deep voice and abnormally large testicles, tested high. the client, with high voice and abnormally small testicles, has to be treated for lowT.

but again i am certain somewhere there is someone who is an exception to this...but it does seem to hold true as a general rule.