Gentlemen,
When writing reviews, please refrain from mentioning the name of the hotels where you saw a woman. Today I was informed by one of the very best providers in the world, that she had cancelled her plans to visit my city due to a client not using discretion in his review.
I had been saving for quite a while to see this lady for ONE hour, and had made special arrangements just to make seeing her during the week possible. Then some random review pops up and spoils everything for me and who knows who else.
Use discretion. Don't be so selfish as to ruin the hobby for others. If you are new, go to the newbie board and LEARN. If you aren't willing to take the time to write proper reviews, that do not compromise the providers, then DO NOT WRITE THEM
...but why the alias? Does not anyone have the stones to say what they have to say while using their handle? Besides me, of course. Explain.
What possible risk could come to a traveler, by mentioning the hotel?
She's long gone before the review ever shows...
It sounds like bothe you and her are over reacting to the level threat this could pose.
Sounds like you two are perfect for eachother though, I'm sorry you missed your date.
jailed because police were able to identify where she was working thru a website like TER. Hotel staff had a printout of her Eros ad as well.
The police monitor this and other sites. Keep in mind that the owners of TBD were prosecuted for promoting prostitution. Identify a hotel and you're asking for it...
I would be intrested in any more specifics you may know on the case of the provider arrest.
However, relating TBD case to the hotel being posted is a stretch for me... But considering the current nature of the crap-shoot courts we have, I'll take your word on it!
I stand corrected!
-- Modified on 8/17/2006 3:04:43 PM
At least one hotel chain prints out eros pictures for people at the front desk.
Posting the name of the hotel in a review it totally useless information, I can think of no reason anyone would need to know what hotel someone was in, I can see saying the meeting was at an upscale hotel but thats as far as it needs go go.
Dude-
Love your I'm a star- fuck the world attitude. REally. It makes for good posts.
But this is real. This shit is on the DL and SHOULD STAY SO! The fact that so0meone is reviewing is enough of a potential security leak - why pile on? I never aks for an addy until I need it. I never post one.
For review purposes, a local landmark (like she stayed close to the Friar's Club- for the Peninsular Hotel in LA, say)does FINE.
NO NEED FOR SPECIFIC ADDRESSES or locations- general is fine.
A good rule for the majority of you is to treat this info like you would your dope dealers'- e.g. NEVER GIVE IT OUT UNLESS YOU KNOW THE RECIPIENT AT LEAST 5 YEARS!
Freakin' amateurs
But you only succeeded in mistaking me for an amateur...
You weren't quite crisp enough in your delivery to piss me off...
I have been in this hobby 19 years, seen 600+ providers (few agency girls,some pro indi's, several young newbies, many AMP ladies and countless street walkers) And have never had an insesodent with LE or low-lifes that prey on those in this hobby, but I've experenced some close calls, yet taken no damage...
I took Turk's opinion of these events as reason enough to recant, without needing to review it further myself. I know he's the type of guy who would have weighed the specifics before finding it nessessary to correct me... And I posted my origional viewpoint based solely on the content offered in the origional post.
But, I still hold to the general opinion it is a rather low risk considering all the other potential breaches that expose touring providers to LE.
Here's a little food for thought...
-- Does a tour gal book in the same hotel every time she comes to that town?
That would add a level of risk over continually changing up hotels for every new visit, wouldn't you think?
-- Is the phone# listed in her ad regestered in her real name, thereby providing easy "desk work investagating" for cross referencing info and finding leads?
In these days of easy to fudge prepaid phones, it would seem 100 times more foolish than this review error!
Red man was correct in that it was not nessessary information, and completely irrelevant in a review! But his overly-emotional delivery detracted from his core point.... Yet considering it cost him his dream date, certainly understandable!
-- Modified on 8/17/2006 6:19:38 PM
No worries mate-
a) Actually not trying to piss you off- I think the totally self centered/self absorbed persona does make for good posting- as it made for a great TV show- seinfeld. I was being sincere- many of the best posters are revealing their inner A.D Clay!!!
b) Never mistook you for a newbie- but the vented spleen sort of tars you with the amateur brush- as with vet's the quiet ones are probably gettin' more done
C) from your resume, it sounds like the laws of big numbers was protecting you, along with your better sense. Your attitude writes some big checks and it looks like luck is cashing them. Watch out- I still think my old 80s-profession instincts and G2 methods are more protective of all concerned.
d) Keep posting- we need the whole gamut of posters to keep this place fun...
Sully the OG
When will some of you start thinking with your big head instead of the little one. Sorry, but no information about the location is pertinent or has anything to do with the review. If you must, you can say it was a nice outcall or hotel. Why give specifics? Who the f . . k cares! Sorry, but I'm on a rant today with misinformed, ignorant sluts (Jane). ![]()
Hugs,
Ciara
-- Modified on 8/17/2006 3:52:39 PM
As Ciara points out, the location is not pertinent to the review.
In other words, we should all try to write reviews in such a way as to give the average hobbyist an indication of what to expect when seeing a given escort. Not that we always succeed, but details on the location add nothing of value to a review.
also consider this when they "review and assess" new reviews. Any reviews that contain TMI should not be accepted. That is more important than "wrong website address", etc.
Great post!
No one needs to know the cross streets, what her apt or hotel looks like.
No one needs to know about the donation or where you put it, or the two call system blah, blah, blah
TALK ABOUT THE EXPERIENCE NOT THE DETAILS!!!!
I know posting sensitive stuff on the boards may get a XXXXXXXX over specific names. They should do the same for reviews.
And yes, you would think that they would not let that type of thing go up in the review, but from what I understand there are a decent number of people that review the reviews, and consdiering the total number that must get turned in each day, I guess it's only natural that things get missed from time to time.
At least it was reported.
Whenever anyone sees TMI in a review, send a problem report, AND shoot me (Girl Next Door) or Staff a PM.
Thanks,
GND
It was very much appreciated
Giving away details that have nothing to do with the quality of service.
With a site like TER that's rather public, it can be very hard for some people to realize just how much of this depends on **secrecy**. And, even more oddly, privacy.
This problem with TMI is a redundant one, and one I have brought to bear before on these boards.
I can only imagine the workload involved in the approving all the reviews that are submitted to TER on daily basis. However; if the reviews are already scrutinized for URL integrity, uniformity/validity in performance scores etc; then a cursory check of "Too Much" sensitive and dangerous information should be performed to protect the providers while moving and enlightening the Newbie reviewers through and about the system.
While I did not alude to location etc., when a newbie I did give details of provider incall location which was meant to up the review because the incall was VERY comfortable ... the provider asked I not post that for personal security reasons and I wrote to TER to have that portion pulled from the review... all ended ok, but to this day was a great lesson for me. Live and learn....